Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Depth

Series — page 2

A field says what an essay is about. A series follows one idea essay by essay — from the question that introduces it to the one that assumes all the others.
The restraint chooses the buckling length, and it is not the member's. A compression flange 12 m long held sideways not at points but everywhere, by a restraint of 0.35 N/mm per mm of length. Unrestrained it would buckle at 173 kN in a single half-wave, drawn faintly. Restrained it buckles at 1968 kN — 11.4 times as much — in two half-waves, because the sum n²π²EI/L² + kL²/n²π² has its minimum there and every other n is worse. The effective length that answer implies is 3555 mm, which is 0.30 of the member and is a property of the restraint rather than of the span.

Continuous restraint

  1. 1 Held everywhere, and it forgets its length
  2. 2 The buckle that will not spread out
  3. 3 A row of frames is not a foundation
3 essays · stability Counting unknowns against equations. Three frames differing by one member. Two equilibrium equations per joint, one unknown per member and one per restraint: fewer unknowns than equations is a mechanism, equal is solvable by statics, more needs stiffness.

Determinacy

  1. 1 Counting the unknowns, and finding out whether statics can answer
  2. 2 The count that does not see it
  3. 3 Rigid by every test, and still folding
3 essays · equilibrium The hour that is really a temperature. The retention factors for carbon steel against temperature: the yield stress and the elastic modulus. The modulus falls away first — at 500°C the steel has kept 78% of its strength and 60% of its stiffness — so a member's failure mode can change during a fire. A member working at 60% of its cold capacity runs out of strength at 558°C, and out of the stiffness for the same ratio at 500°C, 58 degrees earlier. There is nothing about time in any of it: a fire rating is a temperature the member must not reach, converted into the minutes a particular fire takes to get it there.

Fire

  1. 1 The hour that is really a temperature
  2. 2 The temperature is a shape
  3. 3 The fire that goes out
3 essays · materials What the joint does to the beam. End moment as a fraction of the fixed-end value wL²/12, against the joint's rotational stiffness, for a beam of EI/L = 14000. At the rigid boundary of 112000 kN·m/rad the joint delivers 80% of it and at the pinned boundary 20%. Everything between the two lines is a redistribution nobody chose and every analysis assumed away.

Joint classification

  1. 1 The redistribution nobody chose
  2. 2 The joint that was chosen
  3. 3 The joint that has to keep turning
3 essays · connections It is the square of the diagram that destabilises. Four moment diagrams normalised to the same peak, and the buckling factor each one earns. Eliminating the lateral displacement from the coupled buckling equations leaves one functional in the twist, and its destabilising side is ∫M(z)²φ²/EI_z — the SQUARE of the moment, weighted by where the beam wants to twist. A diagram with a peak over a short length has a much smaller weighted square than a flat one of the same maximum, so it buckles at a higher peak: uniform 1.00, uniformly distributed load 1.13, central point load 1.36, cantilever 1.71. The root-mean-square of each diagram, printed beside it, very nearly predicts the order — which is as close to an intuition for C₁ as the subject has.

Moment gradient

  1. 1 The shape of the diagram, and not its peak
  2. 2 The restraint that beats the gradient
  3. 3 The formula that reads four numbers
3 essays · stability Where the demand crosses the capacity. Base shear against roof displacement for a eight-storey frame pushed with a triangular load pattern. It is elastic to 1994 kN, where the first storey reaches its shear capacity, and flattens as each of the others follows — 7 yield events in the order 3, 4, 2, 1, 5, 6, 7. The demand is a displacement rather than a force: the elastic spectrum at the building's own period of 0.93 s gives 173 mm, and the participation factor of 1.26 makes that 219 mm at roof level. Against an idealised yield of 70 mm that is a ductility demand of 3.10.

Pushover

  1. 1 Pushed over until it will not stand
  2. 2 Weaker in one place, and better on every average
  3. 3 The pattern that stopped describing the building
3 essays · dynamics Which of them stops moving. Three load cases on the same rectangle, each a constant moment plus a temperature profile cycled from nothing to a peak and back, over sixteen cycles. At 30% of the plastic moment with a 20°C profile it never yields at all; At 60% of the plastic moment with a 120°C profile it shakes down; At 85% of the plastic moment with a 200°C profile it ratchets, at 1.9% of the first-yield curvature per cycle. The ratcheting case never collapses and never returns: it simply arrives somewhere further round every cycle, which is a serviceability failure that no collapse calculation contains.

Shakedown

  1. 1 The structure that settles down, and the one that walks
  2. 2 The map with three regions
  3. 3 The load it can carry once
3 essays · materials The shear part is not a curve at all. A 300 × 600 rectangle spanning 2,400 mm, a span-to-depth ratio of 4, with its bending deflection and its total drawn together. Bending gives 0.0254 mm and shear a further 0.0049 mm, so 16.3% of the movement is the term beam theory drops. The shear part is drawn separately beneath: two straight lines meeting under the load, each limb straight to 2e-16 of the peak. It is the shear diagram integrated once where the moment diagram above it is integrated twice, so it carries one degree of curvature less than the bending shape — none at all here. The real movement is 1 in 79,116 of the span; both panels are drawn at about 11,932 times it.

Shear deflection

  1. 1 The deflection that is not bending
  2. 2 The stiffness that belongs to the span
  3. 3 The shear that moves the moments
3 essays · deflection A preloaded joint, before and after it slips. Two preloaded bolts at 137 kN each, on one friction face at μ = 0.5. The joint carries 137 kN by friction with the bolts in tension and not in shear at all; past that it slips into bearing and carries 188 kN with the bolts now in shear. Two different mechanisms, one joint.

Slip-critical

  1. 1 The joint that carries nothing until it slips
  2. 2 The hole made bigger so the steel would fit
  3. 3 The torque that goes into the thread
3 essays · connections A fillet weld is stronger across than along. Capacity of a 4 mm throat over 100 mm, against the angle between the weld's axis and the load. Loaded along its length it carries 116.83 kN; loaded across it, 143.09 kN. The ratio is 1.22, which is √3/√2 exactly, and it comes out of the failure criterion rather than out of a test.

Weld strength

  1. 1 The weld that is stronger across than along
  2. 2 The weld that is stronger where it is pulled
  3. 3 The throat that misses the load
3 essays · connections A three-pinned arch, rise 2.6 on span 9. A three-pinned arch under a uniform load. One moment equation about the crown hinge gives a horizontal thrust of 23.37, with no stiffness and no assumption about the section. The thrust line lands on the axis everywhere, so there is no bending anywhere in the arch.

Arch

  1. 1 The hinge put in on purpose
  2. 2 The line that must stay inside
2 essays · structures A brace on the wrong flange never gets there, however stiff it is. The critical moment of an 8 m beam against the stiffness of a single midspan brace, drawn three times for the three heights the brace could sit at. On the compression flange it climbs from 143 kNm to the two-half-wave plateau of 447 — the beam braced into two 4.0 m beams — and reaches 99% of it at 447 kN/m. At the shear centre it needs 2252 kN/m, 5.0 times as much. On the tension flange it never arrives at all: at the stiffness that would have done the job on the other flange it has bought a factor of 1.068, and a stiffer brace in the same place buys the same nothing. Past the plateau the beam stops using the brace, which is where the idea of an ideal stiffness comes from.

Beam bracing

  1. 1 The brace on the wrong flange
  2. 2 Twice the moment, four times the brace
2 essays · stability Bending is a push and a pull. A section carrying a bending moment, with the stress at every height computed as the moment times the distance from the neutral axis divided by the second moment of area. It is compression above and tension below, and zero exactly at the neutral axis.

Bending stress

  1. 1 Bending is a pair of forces, pushing and pulling
  2. 2 When half the section has given up
2 essays · sections An eccentric load is three load cases, and only two of them are checked. A line load of 40 N/mm at 1.5 m from the axis of a 3.0 by 2.0 m box, replaced by the three cases it is equivalent to. Bending is the load on the axis. The torque 60 kNm per metre then splits into a set of edge forces that drives Bredt's shear flow and distorts nothing, and a set with the flange forces reversed — 10.0 kN/m up one web and down the other, 15.0 kN/m across the flanges — which carries no torque at all and squashes the rectangle into the rhombus drawn behind it. Its generalised load is exactly half the torque, so a box girder spends half of an eccentric load's torsion on changing its own shape, and no torsion calculation contains that half.

Box distortion

  1. 1 The section that will not keep its shape
  2. 2 One diaphragm is nearly none
2 essays · sections The column curve. Failure load against slenderness, as a fraction of the squash load. A stocky column crushes; a slender one buckles at the Euler load; the crossover is where the two curves meet, and real columns fall below both near it.

Buckling

  1. 1 Strong enough and still falls over
  2. 2 The column that was never straight
2 essays · stability A built-up column has a second way to bend. A 12 m column of two chords 300 mm apart, joined by double lacing. On the left it buckles the way a solid column does, by bending; on the right the chords stay straight and the lattice racks, which a solid column cannot do at all. Neither happens alone, and the two flexibilities add rather than the two stiffnesses — so the critical load is 1287 kN against an Euler load of 1341 kN, which is 96% of it, and the column behaves as though its slenderness were 80 rather than 79.

Built-up column

  1. 1 The column made of two columns
  2. 2 The lacing decides the force it has to carry
2 essays · stability The characteristic strength, which nothing was measured at. A lognormal population of strengths with a mean of 30 N/mm² and a coefficient of variation of 0.15. The characteristic value is the 5% fractile — 23.2 N/mm², which is 77% of the mean, and which need not be the strength of any specimen that was tested. Dividing it by 1.50 gives 15.5, and the shaded sliver below that is the fraction of the population that would fail to reach it: 6.4e-6, or one in 155,818. A factor applied to a fractile is not covering the scatter, because the scatter has already been spent getting to the fractile.

Characteristic strength

  1. 1 The strength no specimen had
  2. 2 The strength that belongs to the test programme
2 essays · materials One of these two curves is a stiffness and the other is a statement of statics. The torque a spandrel beam carries, against how much of its torsional stiffness is left. The rising curve is compatibility torsion — a floor beam framing into the side of the spandrel, which shares its fixed-end moment of 197 kNm between the spandrel's torsional stiffness and its own flexural one. Uncracked, the spandrel takes 51% of it, or 100 kNm; at a quarter of that stiffness it takes 21%, or 41 kNm, and the floor beam picks up what was shed. The flat line is equilibrium torsion — a canopy cantilevering 2.2 m off the same spandrel, whose 116 kNm is fixed by statics and contains no stiffness at all. The first can be designed away by accepting a rotation. The second cannot be designed away by anything.

Compatibility torsion

  1. 1 The torsion that goes away if you let it
  2. 2 The torque that should not be shed
2 essays · internal-forces Two beams, or one beam four times as stiff. Two 200 × 150 planks spanning 4 m under 6 per millimetre. Loose, they have 112.5×10⁶ mm⁴ between them and deflect 16.2 mm, with the two faces at the interface sliding past one another. Bonded, the pair has 450.0×10⁶ — exactly 4 times as much, because doubling a depth cubes — and deflects 4.0 mm at half the extreme-fibre stress. Nothing was added but a restraint on slip. With connectors of stiffness 200 the same beam deflects 5.4 mm, which is 89% of the way from one bound to the other.

Composite action

  1. 1 Two beams, or one beam four times as stiff
  2. 2 The connection is busiest where the beam is not
2 essays · internal-forces A strength with no mechanism in it, made of four. The shear a member carries with no links in it, split into the mechanisms that carry it, against the member's effective depth on a logarithmic axis. The three bands are calibrated to Taylor's measured shares at one 300 mm × 500 mm member and are then evaluated everywhere else, so the shape of the total is a prediction. Aggregate interlock is the band that dies: it depends on how tightly the crack faces are held together, crack width grows with member depth, and it falls from 62% of a shallow member's strength to 22% of a deep one's. That decay is the whole of the size effect, and the dashed line is the design code's fitted k = 1 + √(200/d), which knows nothing about interlock and falls by a factor of 1.52 where the model falls by 2.05 over the same twentyfold range. Dowel action is why the expression contains the flexural reinforcement ratio, which nothing in a truss analogy would predict.

Concrete shear

  1. 1 The strength with no mechanism in it
  2. 2 The angle is a choice, not a property
2 essays · internal-forces

All essays