Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Series

Moment gradient — the series

5 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. It is the square of the diagram that destabilises. Four moment diagrams normalised to the same peak, and the buckling factor each one earns. Eliminating the lateral displacement from the coupled buckling equations leaves one functional in the twist, and its destabilising side is ∫M(z)²φ²/EI_z — the SQUARE of the moment, weighted by where the beam wants to twist. A diagram with a peak over a short length has a much smaller weighted square than a flat one of the same maximum, so it buckles at a higher peak: uniform 1.00, uniformly distributed load 1.13, central point load 1.36, cantilever 1.71. The root-mean-square of each diagram, printed beside it, very nearly predicts the order — which is as close to an intuition for C₁ as the subject has.

    The shape of the diagram, and not its peak

    A beam's lateral-torsional capacity is quoted against uniform moment, which is the one case a beam carrying a load never has. Change the shape of the moment diagram without changing its peak and the buckling moment moves by a factor of nearly three.

    part 1 · stability
  2. Warping stiffens a short member and nothing at all a long one. The stiffening 1/[1 − tanh(κ)/κ] against kL, both axes logarithmic, over kL from 0.05 to 200. At the low end the curve is a straight line of slope −2, because for small kL the bracket is κ²/3 and the stiffening is 3/kL²: it reaches 1201 at kL = 0.05, falls to 1.005 at the top, and every open section ever rolled sits somewhere on it. The same three plates arranged three ways are marked: the 533 by 190 mm I-section at kL 2.76 and ×1.562, the tee at kL 37 and ×1.027, the angle at kL 34 and ×1.030. A tee's warping constant is 288 times smaller than the I-section's and an angle's 236 times, because their plates meet at a point and there is no pair of flanges to bend against each other — so they have no warping resistance to offer at all, and that is the reason an angle is a poor thing to twist.

    The restraint that beats the gradient

    A moment-gradient factor is worth up to 2.7 on a beam's critical moment and is tabulated everywhere. Holding the ends against warping is worth more, is achieved by a detail rather than by a load case, and appears in no table at all.

    part 2 · stability
  3. Four numbers read from a moment diagram. The moment diagram of the fixed-ended beam under a central point load, scaled to a largest value of one, with the four values the quarter-point formula reads: the peak, and the magnitudes at a quarter, a half and three quarters of the span — 1.00, 0.00, 1.00 and 0.00. The formula turns them into a gradient factor of 1.923. Solving the buckling problem for the whole diagram, on a beam 8 m between lateral restraints, fork-supported at its ends, gives 1.723: the formula is 12 per cent too high, on the unsafe side.

    The formula that reads four numbers

    The factor that credits a beam for the shape of its moment diagram is usually taken from a formula that reads the diagram at four places — its peak and its quarter points — and nowhere else. On the straight-line diagrams it was built around it is safe. On a fixed-ended beam under a central load, whose moment is zero exactly where the formula looks, it is twelve per cent unsafe, and it would give the same answer for a diagram that deserves twenty-two per cent less.

    part 3 · stability
  4. At the tip it is the tension flange that swings. The buckled shape of a 3.00 m cantilever of 457 mm universal beam carrying a load at its tip at the shear centre, root built in: slope and warping held, seen from above: the sideways movement of the top flange and of the bottom flange along the length, scaled so the larger is one. The cantilever hogs, so its bottom flange is in compression, and that flange bows out furthest 0.58 of the way from the root, where it moves 0.15 — and has come back to 0.00 by the tip. The top flange, in tension, swings out to the full 1.00 at the tip. The section twists as it goes, so the flange that is doing the buckling is not the flange that moves most at the end. Critical moment at the root: 1266 kN·m.

    The flange that swings is in tension

    A cantilever hogs, so its bottom flange is the one in compression and the one that buckles. At its tip the bottom flange barely moves: the section turns about it, and the flange that swings out is the top one, in tension. So the restraint that matters at a cantilever's tip is on the flange every rule for spans calls the wrong one — and the root, which a drawing shows as a single line, moves the critical moment by a factor of thirty-four.

    part 4 · stability
  5. Where real roots sit on the warping curve. The elastic critical moment of a 3.0 m cantilever of 457 mm universal beam with its tip load at the shear centre, with its root holding the lateral slope and resisting warping through a spring, against the spring as a multiple of EIw/L on a logarithmic scale — from 521 kN·m free to warp to 1,266 built in — with four real roots placed on it. Top storey, column ends: 2.5 times EIw/L, 791 kN·m, 36% of the way; 15 mm plate, column runs on: 5.9 times EIw/L, 945 kN·m, 57% of the way; 40 mm plate, column runs on: 6.8 times EIw/L, 970 kN·m, 60% of the way; 15 mm plate, column boxed: 19.4 times EIw/L, 1,124 kN·m, 81% of the way.

    The root that belongs to the column

    A cantilever's root must hold its flanges against warping at about fifty times the cantilever's own warping stiffness to count as built in, and doubles its buckling moment if it does. A flush end plate is the usual root, so it ought to be the plate's thickness that decides. It is not. The flanges warp by turning in plan in opposite directions, the plate passes that to the column as two opposite torques, and an open column twists between them more easily than the plate bends: three quarters of the root's flexibility is the column. An ordinary root is worth about six times the cantilever's stiffness, halfway up the curve, and a thicker plate barely moves it. Boxing the column does.

    part 5 · stability

All series