Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Concept

Tension stiffening — where it appears

The contribution of concrete between cracks, which still carries tension and makes a member stiffer than its cracked section alone would be. It puts the real stiffness between the gross and the cracked value, at a position that depends on how far past cracking the member is.

Named by 7 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The beam is stiffer than its cracked section and softer than its gross one. Moment against mid-span deflection for a 300 × 550 mm beam spanning 8.0 m, with the two bounds it lies between. The uncracked line is what the gross transformed section gives; the cracked line is what the section at a crack gives; and the curve between them is the member, because between the cracks the concrete is still carrying tension and the average curvature is not either section's. At the service load the deflection is 23.2 mm — span over 345 — against 8.3 uncracked and 25.2 fully cracked, a factor of 3.03 between the bounds. The interpolation ζ = 1 − β(M_cr/M)² sits it 88 per cent of the way across, and β falls from one to a half under sustained or repeated load because the bond that does the dragging deteriorates.

Stiffer than its cracked section says

At a crack the concrete below the neutral axis has gone and the steel carries the tension alone. Between the cracks it has not gone — bond drags it back into tension, the steel strain drops, and the curvature averaged over a length of beam is neither section's.

deflection · Tension stiffening The least reliable number in the material decides the answer, briefly. What a twenty per cent error in the concrete's tensile strength does to a computed deflection, against how far past cracking the beam is. Well past the cracking moment it does almost nothing — at 1.9 times M_cr the spread is 56 per cent — because the section is nearly fully cracked and the interpolation has run out. Just above cracking it does everything: at 1.19 times M_cr the same twenty per cent moves the deflection by 3658 per cent. Tensile strength is the property with the widest scatter and the least direct test, and a beam designed to sit near its cracking moment has put the answer on it.

The curvature nobody applied

Concrete shrinks as it dries, by about half a millimetre in every metre. In a symmetrically reinforced member that is a shortening and nothing else. In a member with more steel in one face than the other — which is every beam and every slab — the steel holds one side back and the section bends, with no load on it at all.

deflection · Shrinkage curvature Every reason a building is stiffer than its model, added up. The computed natural frequency of a floor, and the same frequency after each source of stiffness that was deliberately left out is put back. Not one of them is a modelling error. Cladding and partitions are stiffness nobody is allowed to rely on for strength; a nominally pinned connection is never pinned; a slab acts with its beam whether or not shear connectors were provided; and concrete between the cracks is stiffer than a cracked section assumes. Together they multiply the stiffness by 1.83 and the frequency by 1.35, because a frequency is the square root of a stiffness, and every factor is halved on the way through. The asymmetry is the finding: leaving stiffness out makes a deflection conservative and a vibration check unconservative in the direction that matters, since a stiffer floor has a higher frequency and sits further from the footfall range. The model here reads 4.40 Hz against a 5.2 Hz criterion and fails it; the floor reads 5.95 Hz and passes. The correction that would have got it right is exactly the stiffness nobody is willing to count on.

Stiffer than the model said

Measured natural frequencies of finished buildings come out between ten and sixty per cent above the values computed for them, consistently and in one direction only. Nothing on the list of reasons is a modelling error: every one is a real source of stiffness deliberately left out — and leaving stiffness out is conservative for deflection and unconservative for vibration.

deflection · Measured stiffness The same steel, and a crack three times as wide. Calculated crack width against bar diameter, with the area of steel held at 1340 mm² per metre throughout — so the spacing changes with the square of the diameter and the amount of reinforcement does not change at all. The width runs from 0.173 mm at 8 mm bars to 0.372 at 25, a factor of 2.15 for identical steel. The reason is in the crack spacing: after a crack forms the bar has to re-anchor the concrete's tensile force before the next one can, and the length that takes is proportional to the bar's diameter. Of the 337 mm spacing drawn, 35% is the cover term and 65% is the bar term — and the cover term is the one that puts crack control and durability in opposition, because cover protects the bar and widens the crack that reaches it.

The same steel, and a wider crack

A crack's width is the distance between cracks times the strain the steel carries over that distance. Neither of those is decided by how much reinforcement there is. The spacing is a bond length, so it goes as the bar diameter; the strain is set by the stress in the steel. Two arrangements of identical steel can differ by a factor of two in crack width, and the one that wins is the one with more, smaller bars.

sections · Crack width The check that depends on a date. Total deflection and the deflection occurring after the brittle finishes are built, for one 12 m beam, against the day those finishes go up. The total barely moves — the beam ends up where it ends up. The increment falls from 32 mm at a week to 14 mm at a year, because creep is fast at first and slow later and a partition built early inherits nearly all of it: 44% of the final creep has already happened by day 28. The span/500 limit is 24 mm and the span/250 limit is 48; this beam passes the first only after day 25. Camber subtracts from both terms of the difference and therefore changes the upper curve and not the lower one, which is the reason a cambered beam can satisfy every total-deflection check and still crack the wall.

The limit that depends on a date

Total deflection can nearly always be met, and on a long span it is met with camber. The limit that actually decides the member is the other one — the deflection occurring after the brittle finishes are built — and camber does nothing for it whatever, because it is subtracted from both terms of a difference. The same beam passes or fails on the day the partitions went up.

deflection · Incremental deflection The water that rises after the basement is finished pushes on its slab first. Section through a line of columns of a 20 × 30 m basement dug 9 m, its 0.9 m slab held down at six columns and by 8 storeys above, designed for a water table 3 m below the ground. The water table as designed is 3 m below the ground, a 6 m head under the slab; dashed, the same water risen 1.0 m. The slab bows up between its columns and walls under the uplift less its own weight (exaggerated). As designed, the building holds itself down at 0.65 of its weight's capacity, the slab is at 0.37 of its bending strength and its cracks are 0.140 mm against the 0.200 mm long set for every crack in concrete that must keep water out. With the water 1.0 m higher: 0.76, 0.45, and 0.176 mm against the same 0.200.

The basement that leaks before it floats

A water table that rises after a basement is finished is a load that grows through the building's life, and the building's flotation check is the last thing it troubles. A metre of rise adds a sixth to the uplift on the whole building but over a quarter to the net load on the slab, which carries the water less its own weight. The slab's cracks, which a watertight basement is designed to, are the first thing to run out of room — and the limit for the cracks that pass right through it tightens as the water rises.

equilibrium · Uplift The deck's width over the pier is set by its bars. The local effective width, as a fraction of the overhang, along a deck flange overhanging 3.0 m each side of its girder, continuous over two 20 m spans under a uniform load, drawn where the moment is at least three tenths of its largest: uncracked (dashed), and over the pier, where the deck is in tension, cracked with 1.5% of steel along the girder and 1.5% across it and with half that transverse steel. EN 1994's widths are drawn as the short level lines, Le/8 over the pier and in the spans. Over the pier the uncracked deck works over 0.325 of its overhang, the cracked one with equal bars over 0.328, and with half the transverse steel over 0.281; in the spans, uncracked, the deck works over 0.81. The rule gives 0.417 over the pier whichever way the deck is reinforced.

The deck that cracks over the pier

Over the pier of a continuous composite bridge the concrete deck is in tension and cracks, and what is left of it is a grid of bars and struts. Shear lag does not stop at the cracks: the bars still receive their force through the concrete between them. Whether the cracked deck works over a narrower width than the whole one depends on one ratio, the deck's shear stiffness over its axial stiffness — and once the concrete has cracked, both of those come from the reinforcement, so the answer is set by how the bars are arranged.

sections · Effective width

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

ServiceabilityComposite actionCreepDeflectionShrinkageBondCamberCrack widthCracked sectionCurvatureModular ratioReinforcement

All concepts