Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Concept

Crack width — where it appears

How far the two faces of a crack have separated, which decides how much shear the roughness on them can carry. It scales with the member's depth while the aggregate bridging it does not, which is the whole of the size effect in the shear strength of a member with no links.

Named by 12 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Cover enters twice, and the strength of the concrete enters once. How long a 20 mm bar has before the cover over it splits, against the cover, split into the two halves it is always split into. Initiation is the time for the chloride front to reach the bar, which goes as the square of the cover — Fick's law and nothing else — and it is 9.1 years at 35 mm and 36.2 at 70. Propagation is the time from there to a split cover, which is short: 0.9 years, because the cover cracks at a section loss of 0.21% and no strength check in this collection would notice a loss that small. The pressure the cover can take grows with the cover too, so cover appears in both terms and the concrete's own tensile strength appears in one of them, linearly. That asymmetry is why every durability clause in every code is about cover and crack width, and hardly at all about strength.

The load that comes from inside

Every action in this collection has been applied from outside — a weight, a pressure, a movement, a temperature. Corrosion is not applied at all, and the reason it belongs to statics rather than to durability is that what does the damage is a load: rust occupies three times the volume of the steel it came from, and the only place to make room is by pushing the cover apart.

materials · Corrosion A strength with no mechanism in it, made of four. The shear a member carries with no links in it, split into the mechanisms that carry it, against the member's effective depth on a logarithmic axis. The three bands are calibrated to Taylor's measured shares at one 300 mm × 500 mm member and are then evaluated everywhere else, so the shape of the total is a prediction. Aggregate interlock is the band that dies: it depends on how tightly the crack faces are held together, crack width grows with member depth, and it falls from 62% of a shallow member's strength to 22% of a deep one's. That decay is the whole of the size effect, and the dashed line is the design code's fitted k = 1 + √(200/d), which knows nothing about interlock and falls by a factor of 1.52 where the model falls by 2.05 over the same twentyfold range. Dowel action is why the expression contains the flexural reinforcement ratio, which nothing in a truss analogy would predict.

The strength with no mechanism in it

A concrete member with no links in it carries shear, and the expression that says how much is three variables raised to fitted powers with a size term in front. There is no free body anywhere in it. What it is fitting is a competition between four things that carry shear across a crack, and only one of them explains why a deeper member is worse at it.

internal-forces · Concrete shear The steel that is sized by the concrete. Ultimate moment of a 1000 × 400 mm section against the area of tension steel in it, with the moment that cracks the section drawn across. The cracking moment is 77.2 kNm and contains no steel at all — it is f_ctm times the gross section modulus, 2.90 N/mm² times bh²/6 — so it is a horizontal line, and every section to the left of where the two meet is one whose first crack is its failure. The crossing is at 507 mm², and rearranging the two expressions gives 0.245·(f_ctm/f_yk)·bd against the 0.26 the codes print — the constant is a section modulus divided by a lever arm and not a fitted number. The rule as printed asks for 538 mm² here, which is 6% more than the derivation needs, and that margin is the whole of the safety in a check whose failure mode is sudden.

The steel the concrete asks for

Every other bar in a concrete member is there because of an action. This one is there because of the member itself — enough steel that the cracked section can carry more than the moment that cracked it, so that the first crack is not also the failure. The requirement contains no load, and both of its consequences run the wrong way round.

sections · Minimum reinforcement The same steel, and a crack three times as wide. Calculated crack width against bar diameter, with the area of steel held at 1340 mm² per metre throughout — so the spacing changes with the square of the diameter and the amount of reinforcement does not change at all. The width runs from 0.173 mm at 8 mm bars to 0.372 at 25, a factor of 2.15 for identical steel. The reason is in the crack spacing: after a crack forms the bar has to re-anchor the concrete's tensile force before the next one can, and the length that takes is proportional to the bar's diameter. Of the 337 mm spacing drawn, 35% is the cover term and 65% is the bar term — and the cover term is the one that puts crack control and durability in opposition, because cover protects the bar and widens the crack that reaches it.

The same steel, and a wider crack

A crack's width is the distance between cracks times the strain the steel carries over that distance. Neither of those is decided by how much reinforcement there is. The spacing is a bond length, so it goes as the bar diameter; the strain is set by the stress in the steel. Two arrangements of identical steel can differ by a factor of two in crack width, and the one that wins is the one with more, smaller bars.

sections · Crack width The strength that does not keep pace. Concrete's mean tensile strength against its characteristic compressive strength, with the ratio of the two on the same axis, scaled. The tensile strength goes as f_ck^⅔, so it rises from 1.57 to 5.04 N/mm² over a sixfold rise in the compressive strength, and the ratio between them falls from 11.1% at C20 to 6.0% at C80 — a factor of 1.83. Nothing in a bending or a column calculation ever uses the lower curve, and everything that decides a transition does: when the section cracks, how much minimum steel it needs, how far a bar has to be lapped, what a member without links carries. So a stronger concrete needs more minimum reinforcement, longer laps and a bigger crack-control check, in a member whose ultimate capacity has barely moved. Its real scale is a length: E·G_F/f_ct² is 299 mm here, which is the size at which a member stops behaving plastically and starts behaving like a fracture problem.

The strength that is never used

Concrete's tensile strength appears in no bending calculation, no column calculation and no shear calculation with links in it. The whole design philosophy is that it cracks and the steel takes over. And it decides where nearly every transition in the subject sits — when a section cracks, how much minimum steel it needs, how far a bar has to be lapped, what a member without links can carry, and how wide a crack opens.

materials · Tensile strength Restraint is a fraction, and the length decides how far up it reaches. A 20 m wall 3.0 m high cast against a base that has already hardened — a length-to-height ratio of 6.67. The base holds the bottom of the wall at R = 0.50 and the top of it at 0.304, decaying as 0.609 to the power of the height in wall heights. The free contraction is 380 microstrain, of which 84 per cent is the wall cooling from its own hydration peak and the rest is drying; the concrete's own strain capacity is 50. Everything to the right of the dashed line cracks, which here is the bottom 3.00 m of it. Nothing has been loaded.

The steel decides how many, not how much

A wall cast on a base that has already set cools, tries to contract, and is not allowed to. What follows is not a stress problem with a strength on the other side of it. The movement is going to happen; the only question the reinforcement gets to answer is how many pieces it is divided into.

internal-forces · Restraint cracking More steel across the crack, until the roughness runs out. Shear resistance of the interface against the reinforcement crossing it. The steel clamps rather than carries, so the resistance is the clamping stress times the interlock coefficient and rises in a straight line — until the asperities crush at 5.50 N/mm², which happens at a reinforcement ratio of 0.79%. Past that the line is flat and every further bar is decoration. The dashed line is what the clamping alone would give if the concrete were unbreakable.

Two models of one bracket

A corbel can be designed as a plane that has to be clamped or as a truss that has to be drawn, and the two are not approximations of each other. They describe different failures, they ask for steel in different places, and the honest answer is that both are checked because neither bounds the other.

internal-forces · Shear friction One of these two curves is a stiffness and the other is a statement of statics. The torque a spandrel beam carries, against how much of its torsional stiffness is left. The rising curve is compatibility torsion — a floor beam framing into the side of the spandrel, which shares its fixed-end moment of 197 kNm between the spandrel's torsional stiffness and its own flexural one. Uncracked, the spandrel takes 51% of it, or 100 kNm; at a quarter of that stiffness it takes 21%, or 41 kNm, and the floor beam picks up what was shed. The flat line is equilibrium torsion — a canopy cantilevering 2.2 m off the same spandrel, whose 116 kNm is fixed by statics and contains no stiffness at all. The first can be designed away by accepting a rotation. The second cannot be designed away by anything.

The torque that should not be shed

A compatibility torque can be let go, because the load has somewhere else to go. What the rule does not say is what it costs the somewhere else — a twenty per cent rise in a floor beam's midspan moment, a crack width nobody limits, and a rotation the spandrel has to actually deliver. There is a size of torque past which shedding is the wrong answer, and no code states it.

internal-forces · Compatibility torsion Two restraints, and only one of them cares how much was imposed. Crack width against the restrained strain, for the same 20 m wall restrained two ways. Edge restraint — a wall cast on a base — gives a width proportional to the strain, because the concrete has to accommodate the movement and the cracks are where it does. End restraint — a bay cast between two that have hardened — gives 0.32 mm at every strain on the axis, because the crack opens only until the steel can push the cracking force back into the concrete, and that force is a property of the section. At the 304 microstrain this wall is asked for, the two are 0.17 and 0.32 mm, and the movement is divided into 35 cracks and 19.

The bay that is cast last

A wall cast on a base cracks in a way the steel controls: more movement gives wider cracks, and reinforcement decides how many. A bay cast between two walls that have already hardened cracks in a way that has nothing to do with how much movement there was — and the threshold that separates a controlled crack from a single wide one is a quantity of steel rather than a limit on anything.

internal-forces · Restraint cracking The deflection a building can take, and which way it is bending. The limiting deflection ratio — the sag or hog of a building divided by its length — at a critical tensile strain of 0.075 per cent, against how long the building is compared with its height. Two curves, and the gap between them is the whole finding: hogging is worse than sagging by exactly 2.0 times, because the neutral axis of a hogging building sits near the bottom and the tension face is the full height of the wall. The minimum is at L/H = 1.6, where the two mechanisms cross: a squat building cracks diagonally in shear and a long low one cracks in bending at the extreme fibre.

The crack is a strain, not a slope

Angular distortion is what every table of settlement limits is written in, and it is a proxy. What cracks a building is a tensile strain in it, and reading the building as a deep beam says which of two mechanisms supplies it, why hogging is exactly twice as damaging as sagging, and why a horizontal stretch of a few millimetres takes half the capacity away before the settlement starts.

deflection · Differential settlement The water that rises after the basement is finished pushes on its slab first. Section through a line of columns of a 20 × 30 m basement dug 9 m, its 0.9 m slab held down at six columns and by 8 storeys above, designed for a water table 3 m below the ground. The water table as designed is 3 m below the ground, a 6 m head under the slab; dashed, the same water risen 1.0 m. The slab bows up between its columns and walls under the uplift less its own weight (exaggerated). As designed, the building holds itself down at 0.65 of its weight's capacity, the slab is at 0.37 of its bending strength and its cracks are 0.140 mm against the 0.200 mm long set for every crack in concrete that must keep water out. With the water 1.0 m higher: 0.76, 0.45, and 0.176 mm against the same 0.200.

The basement that leaks before it floats

A water table that rises after a basement is finished is a load that grows through the building's life, and the building's flotation check is the last thing it troubles. A metre of rise adds a sixth to the uplift on the whole building but over a quarter to the net load on the slab, which carries the water less its own weight. The slab's cracks, which a watertight basement is designed to, are the first thing to run out of room — and the limit for the cracks that pass right through it tightens as the water rises.

equilibrium · Uplift Under a light building the first thing the pump was holding up is the building. The hours after the pump stops at which each check on the basement is used up — the slab's 0.2 mm cracks and the building's flotation — against the number of storeys over it, with the water table risen 3.0 m and ground recovering in 12 hours; drawn at 48 hours where a check is never used up. The cracks' deadline is 9.5 h whatever the building. Flotation's is at once under 2 storeys, 1.0 h under 4 storeys, 4.7 h under 5 storeys, 10.1 h under 6 storeys, never under 8 storeys; with 5 storeys or fewer it comes first.

The building held down by its pump

A basement whose water table has risen above its design level is often given back its design head by a pump under the slab, and from then on it is safe while the pump runs. When the pump stops the water comes back on the ground's own clock, and the checks the pump was protecting are lost in an order the building's weight decides. Under eight storeys only the slab's cracks were ever at risk; under five, the building's flotation check goes first, four and three-quarter hours after the pump stops, and the slab's strength is never in question at all. A structure that was safe by its weight has become one that is safe by a machine, and the machine's reliability is now one of its loads.

equilibrium · Uplift

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

BondServiceabilityTensile strengthMinimum reinforcementShrinkageAnchorageCharacteristic strengthCrack spacingReinforcementReinforcement ratioSize effectAggregate interlock

All concepts