Characteristic strength — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as partial factor — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
The strength no specimen had
A material property is written into a calculation as a number, and a material does not have one. It has a population of strengths with a mean and a spread, and the number used is a low fractile of that population — a value that need not have been measured, that most of the material exceeds, and whose distance below the mean is decided entirely by the scatter.
The dimension nobody can measure
Every flexural capacity in reinforced concrete is proportional to the effective depth, and the effective depth is not on the drawing. It is what is left of the thickness after a cover, a link and half a bar diameter have been taken off it — and each of those is a site tolerance. In a slab, ten millimetres of workmanship is six per cent of the strength.
The load that was left on too long
A timber beam that carries a load for fifty years fails at about fifty-nine per cent of the stress the same beam carries for five minutes in a testing machine. Nothing about the load varies, the member need not have deflected, and the relation between the two is a straight line on a logarithmic time axis over ten decades.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Partial factorSize effectAnisotropyBending momentBondCoefficient of variationCoverCracked sectionCreepCreep ruptureDamage accumulationDuctility