Concept

Durability — where it appears

Whether a structure survives its environment rather than its loads, which decides dimensions that a strength calculation would set differently. The cover to reinforcement is chosen for it and then subtracted from the effective depth, so a durability decision costs a proportion of the capacity.

Named by 4 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Cover enters twice, and the strength of the concrete enters once. How long a 20 mm bar has before the cover over it splits, against the cover, split into the two halves it is always split into. Initiation is the time for the chloride front to reach the bar, which goes as the square of the cover — Fick's law and nothing else — and it is 9.1 years at 35 mm and 36.2 at 70. Propagation is the time from there to a split cover, which is short: 0.9 years, because the cover cracks at a section loss of 0.21% and no strength check in this collection would notice a loss that small. The pressure the cover can take grows with the cover too, so cover appears in both terms and the concrete's own tensile strength appears in one of them, linearly. That asymmetry is why every durability clause in every code is about cover and crack width, and hardly at all about strength.

The load that comes from inside

Every action in this collection has been applied from outside — a weight, a pressure, a movement, a temperature. Corrosion is not applied at all, and the reason it belongs to statics rather than to durability is that what does the damage is a load: rust occupies three times the volume of the steel it came from, and the only place to make room is by pushing the cover apart.

materials · Corrosion
The dimension the capacity rides on is not a drawn dimension. Moment capacity of a 225 mm slab against the cover to the reinforcement. The line is very nearly straight, because capacity is A_s·f_yd·z and z is about 0.9d — so the capacity is proportional to a dimension that is not on the drawing. What is on the drawing is the overall depth, and the effective depth is what the cover, the link and half a bar diameter leave of it: 225 − 30 − 0 − 8 = 187 mm here. Every one of those three is a site tolerance rather than a design decision. Ten millimetres of bar position is 5.7% of this slab's capacity and 1.8% of a 600 mm beam's — the same workmanship costs 3.0 times as much in the shallow member, and the shallow member is the one whose steel is walked on before the pour.

The dimension nobody can measure

Every flexural capacity in reinforced concrete is proportional to the effective depth, and the effective depth is not on the drawing. It is what is left of the thickness after a cover, a link and half a bar diameter have been taken off it — and each of those is a site tolerance. In a slab, ten millimetres of workmanship is six per cent of the strength.

sections · Effective depth
The same steel, and a crack three times as wide. Calculated crack width against bar diameter, with the area of steel held at 1340 mm² per metre throughout — so the spacing changes with the square of the diameter and the amount of reinforcement does not change at all. The width runs from 0.173 mm at 8 mm bars to 0.372 at 25, a factor of 2.15 for identical steel. The reason is in the crack spacing: after a crack forms the bar has to re-anchor the concrete's tensile force before the next one can, and the length that takes is proportional to the bar's diameter. Of the 337 mm spacing drawn, 35% is the cover term and 65% is the bar term — and the cover term is the one that puts crack control and durability in opposition, because cover protects the bar and widens the crack that reaches it.

The same steel, and a wider crack

A crack's width is the distance between cracks times the strain the steel carries over that distance. Neither of those is decided by how much reinforcement there is. The spacing is a bond length, so it goes as the bar diameter; the strain is set by the stress in the steel. Two arrangements of identical steel can differ by a factor of two in crack width, and the one that wins is the one with more, smaller bars.

sections · Crack width
The summer that is worse than the one before it. The earth pressure behind an integral abutment, summer by summer, as a multiple of the at-rest value it started at. A 60 m deck expands by 10.8 mm at each end and pushes the abutment into the backfill. Granular soil under cyclic strain densifies, so the same movement next year needs a higher pressure to achieve, and K climbs from 0.38 toward 0.96 — a factor of 2.49 on the force, reached after about a century. The design load on an integral abutment describes the bridge's whole life rather than a load case, and it is the only load in this collection that gets larger because time has passed rather than because something was added.

The summer that is worse than the last

An expansion joint is a hole in a deck that leaks salt water onto the bearings underneath it. Remove it and the thermal movement does not go away — it goes into the soil behind the abutment, twice a day for a hundred and twenty years, and granular soil under cyclic strain gets denser.

structures · Integral bridge

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

BondCoverCharacteristic strengthCorrosionCrack widthReinforcement ratioTensile strengthAbutmentAnchorageArticulationBar diameterBending moment

All concepts