Concept

Corrosion — where it appears

The electrochemical loss of metal, which in reinforced concrete arrives once a carbonation or chloride front reaches the bar. The products occupy several times the volume of the steel consumed. It is a structural action rather than a maintenance problem, because the expansion splits the cover that was protecting the bar.

Named by 4 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Cover enters twice, and the strength of the concrete enters once. How long a 20 mm bar has before the cover over it splits, against the cover, split into the two halves it is always split into. Initiation is the time for the chloride front to reach the bar, which goes as the square of the cover — Fick's law and nothing else — and it is 9.1 years at 35 mm and 36.2 at 70. Propagation is the time from there to a split cover, which is short: 0.9 years, because the cover cracks at a section loss of 0.21% and no strength check in this collection would notice a loss that small. The pressure the cover can take grows with the cover too, so cover appears in both terms and the concrete's own tensile strength appears in one of them, linearly. That asymmetry is why every durability clause in every code is about cover and crack width, and hardly at all about strength.

The load that comes from inside

Every action in this collection has been applied from outside — a weight, a pressure, a movement, a temperature. Corrosion is not applied at all, and the reason it belongs to statics rather than to durability is that what does the damage is a load: rust occupies three times the volume of the steel it came from, and the only place to make room is by pushing the cover apart.

materials · Corrosion
The same steel, and a crack three times as wide. Calculated crack width against bar diameter, with the area of steel held at 1340 mm² per metre throughout — so the spacing changes with the square of the diameter and the amount of reinforcement does not change at all. The width runs from 0.173 mm at 8 mm bars to 0.372 at 25, a factor of 2.15 for identical steel. The reason is in the crack spacing: after a crack forms the bar has to re-anchor the concrete's tensile force before the next one can, and the length that takes is proportional to the bar's diameter. Of the 337 mm spacing drawn, 35% is the cover term and 65% is the bar term — and the cover term is the one that puts crack control and durability in opposition, because cover protects the bar and widens the crack that reaches it.

The same steel, and a wider crack

A crack's width is the distance between cracks times the strain the steel carries over that distance. Neither of those is decided by how much reinforcement there is. The spacing is a bond length, so it goes as the bar diameter; the strain is set by the stress in the steel. Two arrangements of identical steel can differ by a factor of two in crack width, and the one that wins is the one with more, smaller bars.

sections · Crack width
The two knees the environment takes away. The design S-N curve for a category 71 detail and the two shapes a corrosive environment leaves. In air the slope is three to the constant-amplitude limit at 52.3 N/mm², five to the cut-off at 28.7, and nothing below it. With the cut-off removed the second branch continues. Under free corrosion there is one slope of three all the way down and no knee at all. The faint lines are the five bands of the traffic: three of them sit below the cut-off — an ordinary lorry, a van and a car, 90 per cent of the crossings — which is why they do nothing to a detail in air and something to every other curve on the figure.

The cut-off belongs to the water

An S-N curve's cut-off is the most consequential thing on it: on a category 71 detail under ordinary bridge traffic it deletes ninety per cent of the crossings and leaves two bands doing all the damage. It is a property of steel in air. A crack tip that seawater or de-icing salt can reach has no threshold, no endurance limit and no knee, and the same bridge's life runs from 300 years to 45 depending on which of six defensible calculations is asked.

materials · Fatigue
An old joint passes the bolts that have lost their preload. The chance that an M20 grade 10.9 bolt holds the inspection torque of 647 N·m without its nut turning, against the tension actually in it as a fraction of the minimum preload, for a joint new and 1 year old, 5 years old and 20 years old. New, a bolt at half the minimum preload passes 0% of the time and one at the minimum 83%; 20 years old, the bolt at half passes 80% of the time and one at a quarter 9%.

The wrench that reads the rust

The obvious check on a preloaded joint that has been in service for years is a wrench on the nut, and it measures the wrong thing. The nut holds against the bolt's tension times a friction bracket, and twenty years of rust raise the bracket until a bolt with half its preload passes four times in five. The washer that could have said more remembers only the day it was crushed.

connections · Slip-critical

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

BondCoverCrack widthDurabilityTensile strengthAnchorageBar diameterBolt tensionCharacteristic strengthCoefficient of frictionCrack growthCrack spacing

All concepts