Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Concept

Buckling mode — where it appears

The shape a structure takes as it buckles, which falls out of the same eigenvalue problem as the critical load. Restraint can change it as well as raise the load: a ring in soil buckles into four lobes rather than two, because a long lobe has more soil to push out of the way.

Named by 5 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A brace on the wrong flange never gets there, however stiff it is. The critical moment of an 8 m beam against the stiffness of a single midspan brace, drawn three times for the three heights the brace could sit at. On the compression flange it climbs from 143 kNm to the two-half-wave plateau of 447 — the beam braced into two 4.0 m beams — and reaches 99% of it at 447 kN/m. At the shear centre it needs 2252 kN/m, 5.0 times as much. On the tension flange it never arrives at all: at the stiffness that would have done the job on the other flange it has bought a factor of 1.068, and a stiffer brace in the same place buys the same nothing. Past the plateau the beam stops using the brace, which is where the idea of an ideal stiffness comes from.

The brace on the wrong flange

A brace on a column has one property that matters, and it is stiffness. A brace on a beam has two, and the second decides whether the first is worth anything: put the identical restraint on the tension flange and it does not reach the answer at any stiffness whatever.

stability · Beam bracing The cheapest way out of being round. A ring under uniform external pressure, drawn in its first four buckling modes with the pressure each one needs underneath it, in N/mm². The pressure has no direction: it stays normal to the wall wherever the wall goes, so it does work on any change of shape that reduces the enclosed area, and the ring buckles into whichever shape is cheapest. Bare, that is the oval — n = 2 at 3EI/R³ — and the modes rise as n² − 1, so three lobes cost 2.67 times as much. Nothing in the drawing prefers any orientation, which is the point — a column has an axis to buckle about and a ring has none.

The pressure that needs no direction

Every buckling problem in this collection has had a load with a direction — a column pushed along its axis, a plate along its edge, an arch by what is on it. A buried pipe has none. The pressure is the same everywhere, it stays normal to the wall as the wall moves, and it does work on any change of shape that reduces the area inside.

stability · Ring buckling Wrong in both directions until the building racks. Across buildings from a pure bending tower to a pure racking frame (αH on a logarithmic scale), each 20 storeys with gravity putting its own critical factor at 5.0: solid, the least storey sway factor over the building's own, which is what taking the least storey as the building's costs; dashed, the ground storey's second-order increase estimated from its own sway factor, over the true increase. At αH = 0.1 the least storey factor is 0.77 of the true one and the ground storey's estimate 0.09 of the true increase; at αH = 10, 0.86 and 0.37; at αH = 100, 0.94 and 0.98. The first error is on the safe side and the second is not, and both vanish only for a building that racks.

The storey that cannot see the building lean

A sway check made storey by storey asks each storey how much it drifts under a push and how much gravity sits on it, and reads a critical load factor for the storey from the two. For a frame whose storeys rack like a stack of shelves that is exact. For a building that bends — a braced core, a wall — it is wrong twice. Taking the least storey as the building's reads a critical factor of 3.9 for a building whose own is 5. And amplifying each storey by its own factor finds a 2 per cent second-order increase at the ground storey, where the truth is 20, because the ground storey hardly drifts and carries the lean of everything above it.

stability · Sway stability The buckling mode moves up to where the spine is not. The building's first buckling mode, each floor's sideways movement as a fraction of the roof's, up the height of a 20-storey building of a bending spine and a racking frame (αH 1.0), its gravity scaled to an elastic critical factor of 5.0, under an equal lateral load at every floor: the spine to the roof, and stopping at storeys 15 and 10. With the spine to the roof the mode is the bending tower's, growing all the way up. With the spine stopping, at storey 15 its top moves less than a thousandth as far as the roof, and at storey 10 its top moves less than a thousandth as far as the roof: the building buckles in the first storey of frame above the spine, every floor above that storey moving with it as one, and the spine takes no part.

The storey above the core decides

A building whose bending core runs to the roof shares one sway mode between its core and its frame, and the storey-by-storey stability check reads it wrongly twice. Stop the core five storeys short and the check becomes exact: the first storey of bare frame above the core reads the building's own critical factor to three figures, because the whole building buckles there and nowhere else. The check stays wrong below the core, and it goes wrong again when the frame above is more than about twice as stiff.

stability · Sway stability A hat makes the top storeys look stiff. Each storey's own sway factor α up the height of a 20-storey building of a core to the roof and a racking frame (αH 1.0), its gravity scaled to an elastic critical factor of 5.0, under an equal lateral load at every floor: with no hat, with a hat truss at the roof holding the core's rotation with 10 times the core's EI/H, and with the same restraint at storey 10; the building's critical factor 5.0 as a vertical line. With no hat the top storeys read the least, 4.06 at the roof. With the hat the roof storey reads 15.47 and the least, 4.14, has moved down to storey 9. With the outrigger at mid-height the least is back at the top, 3.85.

The hat that hides the lean

A hat truss on a core-and-frame building holds the top of the core, nearly doubles the building's critical load, and makes its top storeys look three or four times as stiff as they did. The storey check believes them. Under the hat the roof storey reads a sway factor of 15 and estimates 7 per cent of second-order drift; the building still buckles leaning, and the roof storey's true increase is 24 per cent. The hat turns the storey check from pessimistic to unsafe at exactly the storeys it was built to stiffen.

stability · Sway stability

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Amplification factorP-deltaStorey driftSway stabilityCritical loadCritical load factorLateral systemStability coefficientBracingCollapse loadCompression flangeCore

All concepts