Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Concept

Joint stiffness — where it appears

The moment a connection carries per radian of rotation between the members it joins, which decides whether it may be called pinned or rigid. Whether a joint counts as pinned or rigid is a comparison with the beam it connects, so the same connection can be either depending on what it is attached to.

Named by 16 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Moment against rotation, for three real joints. Three connections on one plot, with the classification boundaries for a beam of EI/L = 14000 drawn as rays through the origin. web cleats is pinned, flush end plate is semi-rigid, extended end plate is semi-rigid. The boundaries are multiples of EI/L, so the same joint is rigid on a short stiff beam and semi-rigid on a long slender one.

Neither pinned nor rigid, which is every real connection

Frame analysis offers two options for a joint and reality supplies a continuum between them. Worse, the boundaries are not properties of the connection at all — the same end plate is rigid on a short stiff beam and semi-rigid on a long slender one.

connections · Joint stiffness A joint is springs in series. The five components of an end-plate joint, with each bar the flexibility it contributes. The column flange in bending is 39.62% of the total on its own, and doubling its stiffness raises the joint's by a factor of 1.25 — while doubling the stiffest component buys 1.05. The joint's rotational stiffness is 25227.71 kN·m per radian.

A joint made of springs in series

A connection's stiffness is not a property of the connection. It is the series combination of the flexibilities of everything the force passes through — so the softest component decides, and stiffening any of the others changes almost nothing.

connections · Component method What the joint does to the beam. End moment as a fraction of the fixed-end value wL²/12, against the joint's rotational stiffness, for a beam of EI/L = 14000. At the rigid boundary of 112000 kN·m/rad the joint delivers 80% of it and at the pinned boundary 20%. Everything between the two lines is a redistribution nobody chose and every analysis assumed away.

The redistribution nobody chose

A beam designed as simply supported, on connections that are not pins, has end moments the analysis never predicted and a mid-span moment smaller than it was sized for. Usually that is safe. It is never intentional, and there is one direction in which it is not safe at all.

connections · Joint classification How stiff a brace has to be before the frame stops swaying. The effective length factor of a swaying portal against the stiffness of a horizontal spring at its head. The curve starts at k = 1.317, the unbraced value, and falls to 0.774 — the factor for the same frame with its head held — at a brace stiffness of 23.2 EI/L³. Past that point the frame buckles in the non-sway mode, which the brace does not restrain, and further stiffness buys nothing at all. The threshold is worth stating as 1.41 N꜀ᵣ/L, which is the form the number is memorable in: for a storey carrying a thousand kilonewtons over four metres it is about 0.35 kN per millimetre of sway. Against the frame's own lateral stiffness of 12.0 EI/L³ it is a factor of 1.93.

The most dangerous day is before it is finished

A structure is analysed once, complete, with every restraint present. It spends weeks in states nobody drew — a beam landed with no deck on it holds 17% of the moment its section is worth, a frame not yet braced buckles at a third of the load it will, and a bolt not yet tightened is a pin where the analysis assumed a fixity.

stability · Erection stability One of these two curves is a stiffness and the other is a statement of statics. The torque a spandrel beam carries, against how much of its torsional stiffness is left. The rising curve is compatibility torsion — a floor beam framing into the side of the spandrel, which shares its fixed-end moment of 197 kNm between the spandrel's torsional stiffness and its own flexural one. Uncracked, the spandrel takes 51% of it, or 100 kNm; at a quarter of that stiffness it takes 21%, or 41 kNm, and the floor beam picks up what was shed. The flat line is equilibrium torsion — a canopy cantilevering 2.2 m off the same spandrel, whose 116 kNm is fixed by statics and contains no stiffness at all. The first can be designed away by accepting a rotation. The second cannot be designed away by anything.

The torsion that goes away if you let it

A spandrel beam attracts a torque in proportion to its own torsional stiffness. Crack it and the stiffness falls by a factor of four, the torque falls with it, and nothing has failed — because the floor beam it was competing with picks up exactly what was shed. A canopy hung off the same spandrel is a different animal entirely.

internal-forces · Compatibility torsion One coefficient, and nothing else in it. The deflected shapes of one beam under four load cases, each scaled so that its mid-span deflection is the same, with the tangent at the left-hand support drawn on each. The end rotation is that deflection times a coefficient that depends only on the shape of the load: 3.20 for a uniform load, 3.00 for a load at mid-span, 2.99 for a triangular load, 3.60 for a load on half the span. Every material property, every second moment and the span itself cancel out of the ratio θL/δ, so a beam at any deflection limit has an end rotation that is known before anything about it is: at L/360 it is 8.89 milliradians, or 0.51 of a degree.

The angle nobody limits

Every serviceability rule in this collection limits a displacement. What a bearing, a joint and a cladding gap actually have to accommodate is an angle — and the angle is locked to the displacement by a coefficient that contains no material, no section and no span.

deflection · End rotation The end bolts do the work and the middle ones very nearly nothing. A lap of 10 bolts at 75 mm pitch transferring 800 kN between two plates, with the force each bolt actually carries drawn above it and the flat line a division by the bolt count would have given drawn behind. The end bolts carry 1.16 of their nominal share and the middle ones 0.89. The reason is not in the bolts: at the leading end the first plate is carrying everything and the second nothing, so the two strain at different rates and the slip between them is largest there. In the middle they strain alike, there is almost no slip, and a bolt with no slip across it transfers almost no force. The mean over the worst is 0.861, and the end bolt has to slip 1.16 mm before the rest catch up.

The joint that has to be as good as the member

A splice exists because members come in lengths and structures do not. It has to deliver the same force, at the same stiffness, in the same distribution across the section, through a discontinuity — and each of those three requirements is met by a different feature of the detail, with the third one usually left to look after itself.

connections · Splice Every reason a building is stiffer than its model, added up. The computed natural frequency of a floor, and the same frequency after each source of stiffness that was deliberately left out is put back. Not one of them is a modelling error. Cladding and partitions are stiffness nobody is allowed to rely on for strength; a nominally pinned connection is never pinned; a slab acts with its beam whether or not shear connectors were provided; and concrete between the cracks is stiffer than a cracked section assumes. Together they multiply the stiffness by 1.83 and the frequency by 1.35, because a frequency is the square root of a stiffness, and every factor is halved on the way through. The asymmetry is the finding: leaving stiffness out makes a deflection conservative and a vibration check unconservative in the direction that matters, since a stiffer floor has a higher frequency and sits further from the footfall range. The model here reads 4.40 Hz against a 5.2 Hz criterion and fails it; the floor reads 5.95 Hz and passes. The correction that would have got it right is exactly the stiffness nobody is willing to count on.

Stiffer than the model said

Measured natural frequencies of finished buildings come out between ten and sixty per cent above the values computed for them, consistently and in one direction only. Nothing on the list of reasons is a modelling error: every one is a real source of stiffness deliberately left out — and leaving stiffness out is conservative for deflection and unconservative for vibration.

deflection · Measured stiffness The lining that carries less for being weaker. Bending moment and hoop thrust in a circular lining, against the lining's own bending stiffness, both as fractions of the free-ring values. The ground arrives already stressed — 500 kPa vertically and 300 horizontally at K₀ = 0.6 — and the difference between them tries to squash the hole into an ellipse. A lining stiff enough to refuse absolutely collects the whole distortion pressure, p₂R²/3 = 300 kNm/m; one flexible enough to go with the ground collects nothing, because there is no curvature change left to resist. The thrust is the flat line: it comes from the mean stress rather than the difference, so it does not move at all. Putting 8 joints in this ring drops the moment to 34% of the solid one and leaves the thrust exactly where it was, which is why a segmental lining is jointed and why the intuition carried over from a beam is inverted here.

The lining that is stronger for being weaker

A tunnel lining is not loaded. The ground arrives already stressed and the hole wants to squash into an ellipse; the lining's only job is to refuse, and how much moment it collects depends entirely on how hard it refuses. Make it stiffer and it takes more. Make it flexible — put joints in it, make it thin — and it takes almost none, while the hoop thrust it carries does not move at all.

structures · Tunnel ring The moment a joint makes out of geometry. Bending stress in the chord divided by the axial stress already in it, against how far the diagonal's working line misses the node. A truss analysed as pin-jointed is drawn with its members as lines through their own centroids meeting at a point, because that is what makes the joint a pin with nothing but forces in it. A fabricated joint is not obliged to oblige, and the resultant then has a moment about the node — 16 kNm at the 60 mm drawn. It divides between the members meeting there in proportion to their rotational stiffnesses, 4EI/L or 3EI/L, which is the moment-distribution rule applied to an unbalanced moment that came from geometry rather than from load. The chord takes 48 per cent of it and carries 25 per cent of its axial stress again in bending. Ten per cent arrives at 28 mm, which on a chord of any depth is a detailing decision rather than a mistake.

The joint that is not where it was drawn

A truss is drawn as lines through the centroids of its members meeting at points. A fabricated joint is under no obligation to oblige, and when the working lines miss each other the resultant has a moment about the node that has to go somewhere.

connections · Noding eccentricity A base plate, and when the bolts start working. A 550 × 450 mm plate carrying 900 kN and 140 kN·m, so the resultant sits 155.56 mm from the centre against a kern of 91.67 mm. The plate is in partial contact: bearing over 358.33 mm at a peak of 11.16 N/mm², with the holding-down bolts carrying 0 kN. The plate lifts at 82.5 kN·m and crushes at 192.95 kN·m, and the bolts are not needed until 247.5 kN·m.

The pinned base that is not pinned

A column base drawn as a pin is a plate bearing on grout, and a plate in contact over its whole length resists rotation whether anybody wanted it to or not. The stiffness it delivers depends on the axial load, so the assumption is one a frame can leave and re-enter as its loads change.

stability · Sway stability Prying against flange thickness. The ratio of bolt force to applied force, for a tee stub carrying 140 kN per bolt, as the flange thickness varies. Prying disappears above 31.91 mm and the flange has become a mechanism below 22.75 mm, where the shaded region begins and the bolt has stopped being the thing that decides.

The thickness that decides who fails

A bolt in a tee stub carries more than the load applied to it, because the flange bends and levers against its own edge. How much more, and whether the bolt or the flange is the thing that gives way, are both decided by one dimension — and the two regimes it separates fail in completely different ways.

connections · Prying Where the span moment and the support moment cross. Span moment and support moment against the joint's stiffness, for a 6 m beam under 30 kN/m. They move in opposite directions because they add to a constant — the simple-span 135 kN·m is fixed by statics and the joint only decides how it is split. They cross at 68 kN·m, where the joint is delivering 75 per cent of the fixed-end moment, and neither the crossing nor the fraction depends on the beam, the span or the load: it is the point where f·wL²/12 equals wL²/8 − f·wL²/12, which is f = 0.75 for every beam there has ever been.

The joint that was chosen

A joint's stiffness decides how a beam's moment divides between its span and its supports, and the two add to a constant. So there is a stiffness at which they are equal, the beam is sized by the smaller of two numbers rather than the larger of one, and the design moment is half what a simple connection leaves behind.

connections · Joint classification Two ways for the same plate to fold. An end plate 200 mm wide with a bolt 45 mm from the web face and 55 mm from the edge, and the two families of yield line it can collapse along. The circle closes round the bolt and is 283 mm of hinge — a circle round the bolt. The straight pattern runs out to the plate's free edges and is 249 mm — hinges to the plate edges. The plate folds along whichever is cheaper, which here is the fan, and the 200 mm that comes out is the length of the equivalent tee stub — a dimension that is nowhere on the plate and is 100 per cent of its width.

How much of the plate is bending

A tee stub is an object nobody builds, and the whole component method rests on replacing a real end plate with one. The length of the substitute is not a dimension of the plate — it is the length of the cheapest fold the plate can collapse along, and two families of fold compete for it on a criterion with no strength in it at all.

connections · Prying Two collapses for the same plate, and only one of them fits. The same three bolt rows at 90 mm pitch, folding two ways. On the left each row folds on its own pattern — 249 mm of hinge line round each bolt — and the patterns overlap, because 249 mm of fold cannot fit in a 90 mm pitch. On the right the plate does what it can actually do: the hinges run straight from one row to the next, and the whole group folds on 429 mm rather than 746. The arithmetic follows the drawing — 377 kN for the group against 657 for the rows added up.

The rows have to share one fold

Each bolt row of an end plate is checked on its own, and the answers are added up. Two rows ninety millimetres apart cannot each fold the plate on a pattern two hundred and fifty millimetres long, because there is only one plate — so the group folds on one shorter pattern, and the sum was never available.

connections · Prying The bolt force is the larger of two lines. What an M20 bolt in a 25 mm tee flange actually carries, against the tension applied to the flange. Preloaded to 171 kN it starts there and climbs at Φ = 0.185 — the bolt's own stiffness over the bolt's plus the clamped plates', 857 against 3781 kN/mm — so 18 per cent of every kilonewton applied reaches it and the rest is unloading the contact. At 138 kN the contact runs out and the line joins the one an ordinary bolt has followed from the start, climbing at 2.12. The two lines meet, so the strength is the same either way; what differs is the slope, by a factor of 11.5. The flange's own mechanism is at 172 kN, comfortably past the crossing.

The bolt that was already stretched

Prying is a lever that needs the flange to lift before it can act, and a preloaded bolt does not let it. The bolt carries a fifth of every kilonewton applied until the plates part, and everything after that is the ordinary calculation — which is why preload changes the fatigue answer by a factor of a thousand and the strength answer by nothing at all.

connections · Prying

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Bolt tensionConnectionEnd platePryingServiceabilityComponent methodFree bodyLever armT-stubDeflectionLoad pathSemi-rigid

All concepts