Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Concept

Vibration isolation — where it appears

The mounting of a machine on springs soft enough that the forcing frequency is well above the mounted natural frequency. Most of the disturbing force is then not transmitted. It amplifies rather than isolates below a frequency ratio of root two, which is the range every start-up and shut-down passes through.

Named by 8 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

How much of a force a mount lets through, at three damping ratios. The force transmitted to the support divided by the force applied, against the ratio of the forcing frequency to the structure's own, at 2%, 5%, 20% of critical damping. Every curve passes through exactly 1 at a frequency ratio of root two, whatever the damping: below that ratio a mount amplifies what it was installed to isolate, and above it more damping lets more through.

The machine that shakes the building

Put a machine on springs to keep its vibration out of the floor, and below a frequency ratio of root two the springs make things worse. Every transmissibility curve ever drawn passes through exactly one at that ratio, whatever the damping — so a soft mount either works well or fails badly, with nothing in between.

dynamics · Vibration isolation The resonance that ran out of time. The response of a 0.100 s oscillator at 2.0% damping while the driving frequency sweeps up through its own, plotted against the driving frequency rather than against time. The steady-state amplification is 1/2ζ = 25; this sweep reaches 23.6, which is 95% of it, because the time spent inside the half-power band is a limited number of build-up time constants. The whole answer depends on one group, β/ζ²ω², and over the range this figure's sibling sweeps the fraction falls from 100% to 41%. Two features fall out of the integration and neither is guessable from the steady-state picture: the peak arrives after the frequency has passed resonance, by 1.2% of it here, and the response beats afterwards at the difference between the two frequencies. A machine's instrument therefore reads its largest amplitude while it is already above its critical speed.

The resonance that ran out of time

A resonance amplifies by one over twice the damping, which for a lightly damped structure is fifty or a hundred. That is a steady-state answer and it takes time to arrive — with a time constant containing the same small damping — so nothing that sweeps through a resonance ever collects all of it, and past a certain rate the peak reached stops depending on the damping at all.

dynamics · Transient resonance Damping that is computed rather than measured. Radiation damping of a 2.5 m block on soil with a shear wave speed of 178 m/s, against how heavy the block is made — the horizontal axis is a multiple of the 150 tonne block drawn. At that mass the three modes are at 47, 29 and 13 per cent of critical. None of this is dissipation: the energy leaves as waves travelling away into the half-space, so the quantity is a geometrical coupling and it can be computed from the size of the footing, the density of the soil and its shear modulus. Every curve falls as the block gets heavier, because a heavier block moves less for the same wave field — which is the one counter-intuitive thing here: mass buys frequency and costs damping.

The damping that is radiated

Every response in this field is quoted with a damping assumption attached, because damping is measured rather than designed and the measurement has a factor of two in it. A machine block on the ground is the exception: its damping is not dissipation at all, and it can be computed from three numbers none of which is a material property of anything that dissipates.

dynamics · Vibration isolation Two separate checks, and the block that is neither. Amplification of the steady displacement at a machine 2.0 m above the base of a 150 tonne block 5.0 m across and 2.0 m deep, against forcing frequency. Checked separately, the block sways at 11.2 Hz with 29 per cent of critical damping and rocks at 15.0 Hz with 13 per cent, and the rocking check's peak is 3.99. Because its mass sits above its base the two are one system, with modes at 9.9 Hz and 20.9 Hz — one below both checks and one above — and the block's own peak is 2.49 at 9.7 Hz.

The frequency below both checks

A machine block is checked for sway and for rocking as if they were two oscillators, each with its own spring, its own radiation damping and its own natural frequency. A block whose mass sits above its base is one oscillator with two modes, and neither of them is a sway or a rocking — one sits below both checks, one above both, and the lower one is where the machine resonates.

dynamics · Vibration isolation Set into the ground, the block is quieter only while its sides radiate. Displacement at the top per kilonewton of machine force for a 150 tonne block 3.2 m across and 3.2 m deep, on a logarithmic scale: on the surface, dashed, and with 1.60 m of it set into the ground, first with the side soil radiating as the side-layer model gives it and then with no radiation from the sides at all, dashed. On the surface it peaks at 191.8 µm per kN at 5.5 Hz. Embedded and radiating, it peaks at 11.0 µm per kN at 8.2 Hz. With the same embedment and silent sides the resonance moves up to 8.4 Hz and peaks at 168.7 µm per kN, because the lower mode's damping falls from 3.2 per cent to 1.6 per cent. At 5.5 Hz the three give 191.1, 8.0 and 9.5 µm per kN.

The damping that comes through the sides

A machine block set into the ground is held at its sides as well as its base, and the side soil does two things at once. It lifts the height at which the ground's resistance acts toward the block's centre of mass, which weakens the coupling between sway and rocking without ever removing it. And it radiates, which is what actually flattens the resonance — so the quiet an embedded block promises rests on the stiffness of backfill nobody measured.

dynamics · Vibration isolation Two blows on three foundations. The movement of a 150 tonne block struck by a hammer delivering 18 kN·s, twice, 0.75 s apart. On soil at 12.5 Hz with the 47 per cent of damping a half-space radiates, the block moves 0.86 mm and is still before the second blow. On the same soil over shallow rock, with 5 per cent, it moves 1.42 mm and rings for the whole interval. On springs at 4.0 Hz it moves 4.42 mm, and its ringing has not died when the second blow arrives. The peak force passed to the ground is 1.34, 1.32 and 0.42 MN: the heavily damped block and the lightly damped one pass almost the same force.

The blow that has no frequency

A forge hammer does not shake its foundation; it strikes it. The transmissibility curve every isolation design is drawn on has nothing to say about a blow, and the rules it teaches mislead. The force a struck block passes to the ground is least at a quarter of critical damping, not the most; five per cent and forty-seven pass almost the same; and the springs that soften every blow can bring the block down to the hammer's own rate and make a train of blows ring four times as high as one.

dynamics · Vibration isolation The same blow, three seats under the anvil. The movement of the block — the part of a 150 t hammer foundation, 30 t of it the anvil, that lies below the pad — after one blow of 18 kN·s on the anvil, over three periods of the whole foundation on soil (12.5 Hz, damping 0.47). Rigid seat: largest movement 0.86 mm at 16 ms; pad at 4.0 times: largest movement 1.14 mm at 13 ms; pad tuned to the foundation: largest movement 1.18 mm at 35 ms. On the pad at 4.0 times the block rides the anvil's ringing: a ripple at the anvil's own frequency on top of the foundation's swing, whose first crest lands near the swing's peak. On the tuned pad the block receives the blow as one slow push, peaks later and higher, and then goes on ringing long after the rigid seat has settled, because the mode in which anvil and block swing against each other is damped by the pad and hardly at all by the ground.

The pad that makes the blow worse

A forge hammer's anvil sits on a pad on its foundation block, and the pad looks like isolation: a spring between the blow and everything below it. For the block it is the opposite. Every pad an anvil can sit on makes the block move more than a rigid seat would, by half again when the pad is tuned near the foundation, and what the pad buys instead is a smaller force under the anvil. The hope that a tuned pad could act as a tuned mass works only against a train of blows, and only at a softness the anvil cannot live with.

dynamics · Vibration isolation The forging is a pad nobody designed. For a 2.0 t tup at 7.0 m/s, 49 kJ, on the 150 t foundation with its 30 t anvil on a pad: the largest force through the anvil's pad (solid) against the forging's flow force (logarithmic), with the dies meeting at the right; dashed, the pad force if the same impulse arrived all at once, as a fixed-impulse calculation takes it. Through a forging flowing at 0.1 MN the pad carries 0.15 MN, against 3.70 for the same impulse delivered at once; at 1.5 MN, 2.32 against 3.93; with the dies meeting, 5.86 against 5.93.

The forging that cushions the blow

A forge hammer's foundation is usually designed for a blow treated as a fixed impulse: the tup's momentum, multiplied by a factor for its rebound. The blow is not fixed. Between the tup and the anvil lies a hot forging, a plastic body that flows under the tup, stretches the blow to 48 milliseconds and absorbs nearly all of its 49 kJ, so that the anvil's pad feels 0.46 MN. As the part cools it flows less, the blow shortens, the tup rebounds, and the pad force climbs to 5.86 MN when the dies meet with nothing between them. The foundation is designed by the blow that does no work.

dynamics · Vibration isolation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DampingNatural frequencyResonanceMachine foundationTransmissibilityDynamic amplificationImpulseRadiation dampingRockingDamping ratioModal massServiceability

All concepts