Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Concept

Rocking — where it appears

The motion of a body that lifts off one edge and pivots on it under a horizontal acceleration. Its restoring moment is a weight times a geometry with no stiffness in it, so it has no natural period, and it topples at an acceleration that depends on the body's size.

Named by 14 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The force falls, the drift rises, and the damping goes the wrong way. What a compliant foundation does to a 0.6 s building on a 8 × 8 m footing, against the stiffness of the ground under it. Three curves, all normalised to the fixed-base answer. The period lengthens — 1.31 times at 200 m/s — because the swaying and rocking of the foundation are flexibilities in series with the structure's own, and the rocking term carries an h², so it is the tall building that feels it. The base shear falls with the period, which is why a fixed base is usually called conservative. The displacement rises, by 51% here, and that is what breaks the cladding, the services and the gap to the building next door. And the effective damping falls rather than rises: the structure's own is divided by the cube of the lengthening — 2.2% of an original 5% — while a slender building's foundation radiates only 0.28% back, because rocking radiates almost nothing at these frequencies.

The ground is a spring

Every dynamic result in this collection has assumed a structure rising from something that does not move. Nothing does. A foundation can slide and it can rock, both are flexibilities in series with the structure's own, and the rocking one carries a square of the height — so the period lengthens, the force falls, the drift rises, and the damping goes the wrong way.

dynamics · Soil-structure A restoring moment that gets smaller the further it leans. Restoring moment against rotation for a block 0.90 m wide and 4.20 m tall, both normalised — the moment by its value at first uplift, the rotation by the angle α = 12.1° at which the block topples. It is mgR·sin(α − θ), which is a weight times a geometry with no material property in it at all, and it has two features an elastic system does not. There is a jump at the origin: the moment is whatever the ground demands until uplift and then it is mgR sinα, so the law is discontinuous where a spring's is steepest. And the slope is negative — the further it leans the less it pushes back — so the equilibrium at θ = 0 is stable only because of that jump, and there is no stiffness to divide into a mass. The straight line is what a spring of the same first-uplift strength would have done.

The block that is safer for being bigger

A block resting on the ground lifts off at an acceleration that depends only on its shape and not at all on its size, and then falls over at one that depends strongly on its size. Two objects of identical proportion begin rocking at the same instant and only the smaller one topples — which is why the slender water towers stood in Chile and the squat tanks beside them did not.

dynamics · Rocking One pulse, two blocks of the same shape. Rotation as a fraction of the toppling angle, under a single 0.8 s sine pulse of 1.00 g, for two blocks of identical proportion whose sizes differ by a factor of 3. Both lift off at the same instant, because uplift depends on the shape alone. The small one reaches the toppling angle and goes over; the large one reaches 46%. The kinks are impacts: there is no dashpot anywhere in this model, and the only energy the block loses is lost when it lands on its other corner, at a velocity ratio of 0.926 per landing — 14% of the energy each time, decided by the block's shape and by nothing else.

The only damping is the landing

A rocking block has no dashpot in it. The only energy it ever loses is lost at the instant it lands on its other corner, and how much is a property of the block's proportions — 14 per cent for a slender one and 38 for a stocky one. That single number decides whether it settles or goes over, and a real base does not deliver the value the theory computes.

dynamics · Rocking Damping that is computed rather than measured. Radiation damping of a 2.5 m block on soil with a shear wave speed of 178 m/s, against how heavy the block is made — the horizontal axis is a multiple of the 150 tonne block drawn. At that mass the three modes are at 47, 29 and 13 per cent of critical. None of this is dissipation: the energy leaves as waves travelling away into the half-space, so the quantity is a geometrical coupling and it can be computed from the size of the footing, the density of the soil and its shear modulus. Every curve falls as the block gets heavier, because a heavier block moves less for the same wave field — which is the one counter-intuitive thing here: mass buys frequency and costs damping.

The damping that is radiated

Every response in this field is quoted with a damping assumption attached, because damping is measured rather than designed and the measurement has a factor of two in it. A machine block on the ground is the exception: its damping is not dissipation at all, and it can be computed from three numbers none of which is a material property of anything that dissipates.

dynamics · Vibration isolation The same pulse on a wall that is designed to rock. Rotation as a fraction of the toppling angle under one 0.8 s sine pulse of 1.00 g, for the same 2.0 × 8.0 m wall of 400 kN three ways. Bare, it lifts at 0.250 g; with a 600 kN tendon it lifts at 0.625 g. The bare wall reaches 79 per cent of its toppling angle with one landing; with the tendon it reaches 27 per cent of its toppling angle with eight landings; with tendon and bars it reaches 12 per cent of its toppling angle with 43 landings. With its bars it comes to rest upright. The landings are where the bare wall loses energy; the bars add a loss that does not wait for a landing.

A wall that is allowed to lift

A block that rocks inherits everything that decides whether it survives — a restoring moment set by its weight and shape that falls as it leans, and a loss of energy set by its proportions at each landing. Put a tendon through a wall and yielding bars across its base and both become design quantities, and the ratio between them decides whether the wall comes home.

dynamics · Rocking Two separate checks, and the block that is neither. Amplification of the steady displacement at a machine 2.0 m above the base of a 150 tonne block 5.0 m across and 2.0 m deep, against forcing frequency. Checked separately, the block sways at 11.2 Hz with 29 per cent of critical damping and rocks at 15.0 Hz with 13 per cent, and the rocking check's peak is 3.99. Because its mass sits above its base the two are one system, with modes at 9.9 Hz and 20.9 Hz — one below both checks and one above — and the block's own peak is 2.49 at 9.7 Hz.

The frequency below both checks

A machine block is checked for sway and for rocking as if they were two oscillators, each with its own spring, its own radiation damping and its own natural frequency. A block whose mass sits above its base is one oscillator with two modes, and neither of them is a sway or a rocking — one sits below both checks, one above both, and the lower one is where the machine resonates.

dynamics · Vibration isolation After a yield, the prestress left does not remember the prestress put in. The prestress left in the tendon of a 2.0 × 8.0 m rocking wall of 400 kN once it has rocked to each rotation and come back upright, for a tendon yielding at 1,370 kN and stiffening by 20 kN a millimetre as the base opens, prestressed to 300 kN, 600 kN and 900 kN. Each keeps all its prestress until it yields — at 53.5 mrad, 38.5 mrad and 23.5 mrad — and then loses 20 kN for every further milliradian, so past 53.5 mrad the three lines are one: the yield force less the stiffness times the stretch. Every one of them is slack at upright past 68.5 mrad. With bars of 400 kN the wall re-centres only while 400 kN remains, dashed, and it keeps that only up to 48.5 mrad, whatever it was prestressed to.

The tendon that forgets its prestress

A rocking wall comes home because a tendon pulls it, and the tendon must not yield — yet the rotations that test the wall are exactly the ones that stretch it. Past its yield, the force a tendon keeps is its yield force less its stiffness times the stretch, whatever it was prestressed to, so the guarantee a design needs is a limit on rotation, and more prestress only reaches that limit sooner.

dynamics · Rocking Set into the ground, the block is quieter only while its sides radiate. Displacement at the top per kilonewton of machine force for a 150 tonne block 3.2 m across and 3.2 m deep, on a logarithmic scale: on the surface, dashed, and with 1.60 m of it set into the ground, first with the side soil radiating as the side-layer model gives it and then with no radiation from the sides at all, dashed. On the surface it peaks at 191.8 µm per kN at 5.5 Hz. Embedded and radiating, it peaks at 11.0 µm per kN at 8.2 Hz. With the same embedment and silent sides the resonance moves up to 8.4 Hz and peaks at 168.7 µm per kN, because the lower mode's damping falls from 3.2 per cent to 1.6 per cent. At 5.5 Hz the three give 191.1, 8.0 and 9.5 µm per kN.

The damping that comes through the sides

A machine block set into the ground is held at its sides as well as its base, and the side soil does two things at once. It lifts the height at which the ground's resistance acts toward the block's centre of mass, which weakens the coupling between sway and rocking without ever removing it. And it radiates, which is what actually flattens the resonance — so the quiet an embedded block promises rests on the stiffness of backfill nobody measured.

dynamics · Vibration isolation The toe that runs out of ground. A block 6.0 m square on ground that bears 300 kPa at most — 10800 kN over the whole base — pushed 8.0 m up, weighing 3000 kN, drawn at three stages of the push with the lean exaggerated eight times and the contact pressure under the base; the dashed line is the ground's bearing limit. At a push of 629 kN it touches the ground over 3.9 m of its 6.0 and has not yet brought the ground to its limit anywhere. At a push of 770 kN it touches the ground over 2.5 m of its 6.0 and has brought the ground to its limit under 0.8 m. At a push of 776 kN it touches the ground over 2.3 m of its 6.0 and has brought the ground to its limit under 1.1 m. The last is the tipping push: the heel has lifted, the toe is pressing the ground at its limit over a widening block, and the lever arm of the weight about that block is shrinking as the block grows.

The ballast that helps it over

On rigid ground a heavier block is harder to tip, in exact proportion to its weight — that is the whole of the overturning check. On ground with a bearing capacity it is not. The toe presses the ground to its limit, the weight's lever arm shrinks as the yielded block under the toe grows, and the tipping push peaks when the block weighs half of what the ground under it can bear. Past that, every tonne of ballast added to steady it brings it closer to going over.

equilibrium · Overturning Three grounds, three tipping pushes. The push against the lean it produces, in thousandths of a radian, for the 6 m square, 3,000 kN block on ground that bears 300 kPa at most, half of it mobilised at 7.5 mm of settlement, pushed 8 m up, its weight 5.0 m up, on the three grounds matched at their limit and at half of it; dashed, the rigid-plastic limit, 813 kN. Linear, capped: 776 kN at a lean of 13.2 thousandths; hyperbolic: 701 kN at a lean of 26.2 thousandths; S-shaped: 770 kN at a lean of 15.2 thousandths. The S-shaped ground behaves almost exactly like the capped one; the hyperbola, which never quite reaches its limit, tips 10 per cent sooner at twice the lean.

The ground that never quite gives way

On a bed of springs capped at the ground's bearing limit, a block pushed sideways tips at a definite push, below the limit the rigid-plastic parabola gives. Real ground is curved: it softens all the way to its limit and never quite reaches it. On such ground the block has no tipping push of its own. Its resistance creeps toward the limit, and the peak it does have is made by its own weight leaning with it — 14 per cent below the limit with the weight 5 m up, nearly at it with the weight at the base, where the lean simply runs away.

equilibrium · Overturning A fuse caps the force the strand ever sees. The force in the tendon line of a 2.0 × 8.0 m rocking wall of 400 kN, prestressed to 600 kN, with bars of 400 kN, against the opening of the base under the tendon, loaded to 79 mm and back: the strand alone, 20 kN/mm yielding at 1,370 kN, and the strand with a fuse yielding at 1,000 kN with a stiffness of 500 kN/mm in series, together 19.2 kN/mm and capped at 1,000 kN. The strand alone yields at 39 mm and is slack at upright after any opening past 69 mm; the fused line yields at 21 mm and is slack past 52 mm. In the fused line the strand carries the line's force and never more than 1,000 kN, so it stays elastic and all the plastic stretch, 58 mm at this opening, is in the fuse.

The fuse that protects the strand and not the wall

A rocking wall's tendon loses its prestress when it yields, so give it a fuse: a short link in series that yields first and is replaced afterwards. The strand then never passes 1,000 kN and stays elastic. But the fuse caps the restoring moment lower, so under the same 1.5 g pulse the wall rocks to 110 mrad instead of 89, and the line loses all its prestress just as the strand did. A new fuse gives the prestress back; the bars' stretch stays, and the next pulse takes the wall to 134 mrad.

dynamics · Rocking Ground already loaded rocks stiffer than springs that are not. The moment on the column against its rotation through a storm that takes the moment to ±1,000 kN·m and back, for an 8 m strip of EI 540 MN·m² on a bed of 50 MN/m² under a 1,000 kN column: on elastic springs that cannot pull, and on ground that unloads and reloads 4 times as stiffly as it first loads, in the first storm and the third. On elastic springs the column turns 1.418 milliradians at the peak, a rocking stiffness of 0.70 GN·m/rad, the same every storm. On the remembering ground it turns 1.116 in the first storm and 0.868 in the third — 0.90 and 1.15 GN·m/rad — because rocking unloads half the strip, and ground that has carried the column unloads stiffly.

The footing the storms press down

A footing strip under a column that a storm rocks one way and then the other was expected to dig itself a bowl: its ends loaded half the time, compacted, and left hanging over the hollow. On ground that unloads and reloads four times as stiffly as it first loads, the bowl appears and the strip fills it. The column settles 26% more over three storms and then stops; the footing rocks 22% less than it did in its first storm and is 64% stiffer than on springs that forget, because rocking unloads half the strip and ground that has carried the column unloads stiffly. The storms change the settlement and the stiffness, and leave the moments almost where they were.

internal-forces · Elastic foundation A prevailing wind leans the footing, and the lean stops. The 8 m strip of EI 540 MN·m² on a bed of 50 MN/m² under a 1,000 kN column on ground that unloads and reloads 4 times as stiffly as it first loads, rocked by storms that push to 1,000 kN·m one way and swing back all, three quarters, half, a quarter or none of that the other: the column's tilt at rest after each of eight storms, in milliradians, positive the way the storms push. After eight: 0.011, 0.064, 0.117, 0.171, 0.218. Each settles within three storms; the lean is set by how unequal the storms are, not by how many there have been.

The footing a prevailing wind leans

A footing rocked by storms that reverse evenly settles into a symmetric bowl and stops. A footing under a frame in a prevailing wind is pushed harder one way than the other, and its ground keeps the difference. It leans — and then it stops leaning, within three storms, at a tilt set by how unequal the storms are and how large the largest has been. Fifty years of storms lean it further only in the years when a storm beats every one before it, and between those years nothing that happens to the footing moves it at all.

internal-forces · Elastic foundation Pressed and pulled, the footing leans once and stops. The column's tilt at rest after each of eight storms reversing fully to 300 kN·m each way, on the 8 m strip of EI 540 MN·m², weighing 320 kN, on a bed of 50 MN/m² under a column carrying 1,000 kN, on ground that unloads and reloads 4 times as stiffly as it first loads, for loads swinging by 0, 50, 100, 150, 200 per cent. 0 per cent: −0.007 milliradians after the first storm and 0.003 after the eighth; 50 per cent: 0.112 milliradians after the first storm and 0.103 after the eighth; 100 per cent: 0.109 milliradians after the first storm and 0.091 after the eighth; 150 per cent: 0.113 milliradians after the first storm and 0.095 after the eighth; 200 per cent: 0.114 milliradians after the first storm and 0.102 after the eighth. The lean is towards the end the heavier half of each storm presses; it stops within three storms whether or not the strip ever hangs clear.

The footing that hangs from its column

A footing under a bracing bay's column is pressed hard when the wind pushes one way and pulled when it swings back, and if the pull is larger than the footing's weight it hangs from the column, clear of the ground, for part of every storm. It looks like a footing free to come down somewhere new each time, and walk. It does not walk. The ground under it keeps the memory of every press, and a footing that is not touching the ground cannot change that memory; it comes back down into its own bowl, leans once towards its harder press, and stops within three storms.

internal-forces · Elastic foundation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

OverturningDampingContact pressureEnergy dissipationSoil-structure interactionNon-linear responseRadiation dampingSoil stiffnessSubgrade modulusDuctility demandElastic foundationHysteresis

All concepts