Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Concept

Overturning — where it appears

The rotation of a body about an edge of its base, checked as a ratio of a restoring moment to a disturbing one with no material strength in it. Neither term contains a strength, so the check is a ratio of two weights and the only design variables are geometry and ballast.

Named by 23 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Weight is the only thing holding it down. A body 2.5 m wide and 6 m tall weighing 120 kN, under a wind pressure of 1 kN/m². The wind delivers 48 kN and an overturning moment of 144 kNm about the leeward toe; the weight restores 150 kNm, a factor of 1.04. The resultant lands 1.20 m from the centre against a middle third of ±0.42 m, so the base is lifting over 2.35 m of its width.

Weight is the only thing resisting it

A structure that is strong enough everywhere can still be blown over, and nothing in its material properties has any part in whether it is. The whole answer is a weight and a width — and the failure begins long before anything tips, at the moment one edge stops pressing down.

equilibrium · Overturning The reaction lies inside the cone, so the block stands. A block of 100 on a plane at 15°, against a coefficient of friction of 0.35. Resolving across and along the plane gives a normal force of 96.6 and a friction demand of 25.9, against a capacity of μN = 33.8 — a ratio of 0.77. Added together the two make one contact reaction leaning 15.0° from the normal, and the admissible reactions fill a cone of half-angle arctan μ = 19.3°. Equilibrium is possible exactly when the demanded reaction lies inside that cone, which here it does. The weight enters neither the cone nor the lean: a block of any weight on this slope leans its reaction by the same 15.0°, which is why the angle of repose is a material property and the size of a heap of sand is not.

The force that is whatever it needs to be

Every other force in statics has a value the equations produce. Friction has an inequality instead, so it takes whatever value equilibrium demands and the bound only ever says no — which means a problem with friction in it has a range of answers rather than one.

equilibrium · Friction Five loads behind one wall, and the water is the biggest. The horizontal pressure on a 6 m wall retaining soil at 18 kN/m³ with a friction angle of 30°, a surcharge of 10 kPa and the water table 2 m down, drawn once as the profile the wall feels and then once per term. The terms are surcharge 20.0 kN/m at 3.00 m, soil above water 12.0 kN/m at 4.67 m, soil at the water table 48.0 kN/m at 2.00 m, submerged soil 27.2 kN/m at 1.33 m, water 78.5 kN/m at 1.33 m, and they sum to 185.7 kN/m — matched to 7e-8 by integrating the drawn profile numerically. The largest single term is the water, at 78.5 kN/m: water has no shear strength, so its coefficient is exactly one where the soil's is 0.333, and it acts on top of the soil's effective stress rather than instead of it. The combined resultant sits at 1.90 m above the base, 0.317 of the height rather than the third point at 2.00 m that a pure triangle would give.

The load that depends on what carries it

Every other load in this collection is a number the structure is given. Retained soil is not — it pushes with a fraction of its own weight, and the fraction is decided by how far the wall moves. Six millimetres of retreat on a six-metre wall takes a third off the load, and being held still puts it back.

equilibrium · Lateral pressure How stiff a brace has to be before the frame stops swaying. The effective length factor of a swaying portal against the stiffness of a horizontal spring at its head. The curve starts at k = 1.317, the unbraced value, and falls to 0.774 — the factor for the same frame with its head held — at a brace stiffness of 23.2 EI/L³. Past that point the frame buckles in the non-sway mode, which the brace does not restrain, and further stiffness buys nothing at all. The threshold is worth stating as 1.41 N꜀ᵣ/L, which is the form the number is memorable in: for a storey carrying a thousand kilonewtons over four metres it is about 0.35 kN per millimetre of sway. Against the frame's own lateral stiffness of 12.0 EI/L³ it is a factor of 1.93.

The most dangerous day is before it is finished

A structure is analysed once, complete, with every restraint present. It spends weeks in states nobody drew — a beam landed with no deck on it holds 17% of the moment its section is worth, a frame not yet braced buckles at a third of the load it will, and a bolt not yet tightened is a pin where the analysis assumed a fixity.

stability · Erection stability A basement is a boat. A 20 by 30 m substructure dug 6 m into ground whose water table stands 2 m down. The head on the underside of the base slab is 4.0 m, so the pressure there is 39.2 kN/m² over the whole plan — 23.5 MN of it, pushing upward. Nothing about the structure changes that number. What resists it is weight: 18.7 MN of concrete and whatever is built above, giving a factor of 0.80. The structure floats if the water reaches 2.82 m below the ground, and a base slab alone would have to be 1.64 m thick to hold it down.

A basement is a boat

Every load in this collection presses down and is resisted by strength. Hydrostatic uplift presses up, is resisted by weight, and does not care what is built on it — so the check contains no material property at all. It is a ratio of two weights, and one of them is water.

equilibrium · Uplift A couple applied to the core, and two columns to make it. A 20-storey core with one outrigger at 59% of its height. The arm is stiff in bending and the perimeter columns are stiff in tension and compression, so between them they resist the core's rotation at that level — a couple of 35283 kNm here, carried as a 294 kN pair in the columns at 120 m centres. The compatibility is one equation: the core's rotation at that level, less what the couple takes back out of it, equals the rotation the arm and its columns allow. The top drift falls from 360 mm to 74, which is 80% of it, and the base moment from 73500 to 38217 kNm. The deflected shape is drawn hugely exaggerated: the real top drift is about one five-hundredth of the height.

The arm that makes the columns work

The perimeter columns of a tall building are already there, already carrying gravity, and already the furthest thing from the centre. They take almost none of the overturning, because a floor slab transmits shear and not moment — and one storey-deep arm at the right height changes that by nearly a half.

structures · Outrigger Balanced, and four times as heavy on the bearing. A bascule leaf of 900 kN whose centroid is 9 m from the trunnion, balanced by 2700 kN at 3 m on the other side. What balancing achieves is exactly one thing: the moment about the pivot is zero at every opening angle, because both terms carry the same cosine. What it costs is two things that are not zero. The reaction on the trunnion becomes 4.0 times the leaf's own weight, since both weights are still there. And the rotational inertia rises by 33%, so the balanced leaf is the hardest one to start and to stop — which is why the counterweight is put as close to the pivot as it will fit, at the price of being heavy: the same balance at twice the radius weighs 1350 kN and carries 1.25 times the inertia.

Balanced, and four times as heavy

A counterweight cancels a moment about a pivot, and that is the only thing it cancels. The bearing beneath carries both weights, the inertia rises as the square of the radius, and a load that moves cannot be balanced at more than one position at all.

equilibrium · Counterweight Two cantilevers, or one wall, and the beams decide which. The deflected shape of a coupled pair of 6 m walls, drawn against the two limits it lies between. Release the coupling beams entirely and the pair is two independent cantilevers, deflecting 111 mm. Make them rigid and it is one composite wall of the full width, deflecting 16 mm — 6.8 times stiffer, because the lever arm between the wall centroids is 8.40 m and everything inside either wall is smaller than that. Real beams of 600 × 350 mm over a 2.4 m opening land at 23 mm and carry 63% of the base overturning as an axial couple rather than as wall bending. The degree of coupling never reaches one, because a beam of finite depth cannot suppress the walls' curvature entirely.

Two walls that agreed to be one

A pair of shear walls with a row of doors between them is the commonest lateral system there is, and it has two readings that differ by a factor of seven. What decides which one applies is a beam 600 mm deep over a 2.4 m opening — and most of the overturning ends up as an axial couple that no bending diagram contains.

internal-forces · Wall coupling The line, and the stone it has to stay inside. A masonry pier 9 m high, 1.6 m thick at the top and battered 12% on its outer face, taking a thrust of 40 kN per metre of run at 25° to the horizontal. The line drawn through it is the locus of the resultant on each horizontal cut: everything above the cut is the free body, and the resultant's position is the moment divided by the vertical force. The dashed pair is the middle third, inside which no tension is implied anywhere on the joint. The line stays inside the stone throughout and reaches the base at 0.503 m from the centre, against a half-width of 1.34 m — but outside the middle third, so part of the base joint is open and the toe is carrying a triangle. Nothing about the strength of the masonry appears anywhere in this figure, and that is the point.

The weight that makes it safer

Every load in this collection makes a structure worse. A pinnacle does not. A masonry pier fails when the line of compression leaves the stonework, and adding weight at the top rotates that line back towards the vertical without adding anything the pier cannot carry — so the stone is not being strengthened, it is being aimed.

structures · Buttress The wind pushes on one face and pulls on three. A 30 × 20 m building in plan, with the measured pressure coefficient on each face and the arrows drawn in the direction the pressure acts. Only the windward face is pushed; the other three are sucked, and the side faces are sucked hardest of all at c_p = -0.7. The horizontal resultant is 842 kN at a velocity pressure of 0.9 kPa, and the arithmetic of it is the whole point: the leeward suction pulls the building downwind, so it ADDS, supplying 38% of the answer, while the two side faces cancel each other exactly and supply none of it. The coefficients are wind tunnel data; what is computed is the free body they are applied to.

Most of it is suction

A wind load is drawn as arrows pressing on the windward face, which is where about three fifths of it comes from. The rest is a pull on the back. The two side faces carry the largest suctions on the building and contribute nothing at all to the answer — and the inside of the building, which nobody draws, decides whether the roof stays on.

equilibrium · Wind pressure A broad tank sloshes and a tall one does not. The liquid's division into the part that moves with the wall and the part that sloshes, against the tank's proportion. The convective masses come from the potential-flow solution and the impulsive mass is whatever is left, so the two sum to the liquid's mass exactly at every proportion rather than approximately over part of the range. A tall tank at H/R = 3 is 84% impulsive and behaves almost like a solid; a shallow one at H/R = 0.5 is 72% convective and most of its contents never notice the earthquake. This tank sits at H/R = 1.33, which is 65% impulsive.

The liquid has a period of its own

Shake a tank and its contents do not all go with it. Part of the liquid moves as though it were bolted to the wall and part sloshes at a period fixed by gravity and the radius, which the tank's stiffness has no influence over whatever. The split is decided by one proportion, and the two parts then take entirely different amounts of the earthquake.

dynamics · Sloshing A restoring moment that gets smaller the further it leans. Restoring moment against rotation for a block 0.90 m wide and 4.20 m tall, both normalised — the moment by its value at first uplift, the rotation by the angle α = 12.1° at which the block topples. It is mgR·sin(α − θ), which is a weight times a geometry with no material property in it at all, and it has two features an elastic system does not. There is a jump at the origin: the moment is whatever the ground demands until uplift and then it is mgR sinα, so the law is discontinuous where a spring's is steepest. And the slope is negative — the further it leans the less it pushes back — so the equilibrium at θ = 0 is stable only because of that jump, and there is no stiffness to divide into a mass. The straight line is what a spring of the same first-uplift strength would have done.

The block that is safer for being bigger

A block resting on the ground lifts off at an acceleration that depends only on its shape and not at all on its size, and then falls over at one that depends strongly on its size. Two objects of identical proportion begin rocking at the same instant and only the smaller one topples — which is why the slender water towers stood in Chile and the squat tanks beside them did not.

dynamics · Rocking The force nobody applied, and the speed it wins at. Lateral force per unit weight for a vehicle on a 400 m curve, against speed. The rising curve is what the free body demands — v²/gR, which is the body's own acceleration written on the other side of the equation — and the flat line is what 6.0° of cant supplies from the weight. They cross at 73 km/h, which is the speed the curve was set out for; below it the deficiency has the other sign and the rail is pushed the other way. The upper line is overturning, at b/2h = 0.399 — and there is no mass in that number, so a loaded vehicle and an empty one go over at the same 160 km/h and only the height of the load decides. At the 108 km/h drawn the deficiency is 0.124 of the weight, which is 49 kN on this 40 tonne vehicle.

The force that is really an acceleration

Every other load in this collection is applied by something. This one is applied by nothing at all — it is the body's own acceleration, written on the other side of the equation so that statics can be used on a problem statics has no business with. The move is legitimate, it is a hundred and eighty years old, and it is exactly half done more often than it is done.

equilibrium · Centrifugal load The reaction lies inside the cone, so the block stands. A block of 48 on a plane at 22°, against a coefficient of friction of 0.6. Resolving across and along the plane gives a normal force of 44.5 and a friction demand of 18.0, against a capacity of μN = 26.7 — a ratio of 0.67. Added together the two make one contact reaction leaning 22.0° from the normal, and the admissible reactions fill a cone of half-angle arctan μ = 31.0°. Equilibrium is possible exactly when the demanded reaction lies inside that cone, which here it does. The weight enters neither the cone nor the lean: a block of any weight on this slope leans its reaction by the same 22.0°, which is why the angle of repose is a material property and the size of a heap of sand is not.

The area that is not in the equation

Friction is proportional to the force pressing two surfaces together and independent of how large they are, which sounds like an approximation and is not. The area is absent because the contact that carries the load is a tiny fraction of the contact that is drawn, and that fraction grows in exact proportion to the load.

equilibrium · Friction Weight is the only thing holding it down. A body 1.6 m wide and 4.5 m tall weighing 22 kN, under a wind pressure of 1 kN/m². The wind delivers 2 kN and an overturning moment of 4 kNm about the leeward toe; the weight restores 18 kNm, a factor of 4.35. The resultant lands 0.18 m from the centre against a middle third of ±0.27 m, so the base is still wholly in bearing.

Whether it tips or slides

A free body pushed sideways has two ways of leaving, and which one it takes is decided before any load is known. The condition is a width divided by a height set against a coefficient of friction, and the weight, the wind pressure and the depth of the body all cancel out of it.

equilibrium · Overturning One pulse, two blocks of the same shape. Rotation as a fraction of the toppling angle, under a single 0.8 s sine pulse of 1.00 g, for two blocks of identical proportion whose sizes differ by a factor of 3. Both lift off at the same instant, because uplift depends on the shape alone. The small one reaches the toppling angle and goes over; the large one reaches 46%. The kinks are impacts: there is no dashpot anywhere in this model, and the only energy the block loses is lost when it lands on its other corner, at a velocity ratio of 0.926 per landing — 14% of the energy each time, decided by the block's shape and by nothing else.

The only damping is the landing

A rocking block has no dashpot in it. The only energy it ever loses is lost at the instant it lands on its other corner, and how much is a property of the block's proportions — 14 per cent for a slender one and 38 for a stocky one. That single number decides whether it settles or goes over, and a real base does not deliver the value the theory computes.

dynamics · Rocking The resultant has left the base, and it tips. A body on three supports weighing 60 kN, pushed sideways by 16 kN at a height of 3 m in the plan direction 270°. The push moves the resultant of weight and push 0.80 m from under the weight, and the base — the convex hull of the supports, shaded — lets it go 0.75 m that way before the edge drawn heavy becomes a tipping line: a factor of 0.94, found both along the ray and by moments about that edge. The dashed rosette is the same reach in every direction, from 0.75 m toward the middle of the nearest edge to 1.50 m toward the furthest support. To hold it the support opposite the tipping edge would have to pull 1.3 kN, which a support standing on the ground cannot do, so it lifts and the body turns about that edge.

Half as far between the legs

A body standing on feet, legs or pads has for its base the polygon its supports enclose, and how far its weight can be pushed before it tips depends on which way it is pushed. A three-legged stand pushed toward the gap between two legs has exactly half the reach it has pushed toward one of them.

equilibrium · Overturning The same pulse on a wall that is designed to rock. Rotation as a fraction of the toppling angle under one 0.8 s sine pulse of 1.00 g, for the same 2.0 × 8.0 m wall of 400 kN three ways. Bare, it lifts at 0.250 g; with a 600 kN tendon it lifts at 0.625 g. The bare wall reaches 79 per cent of its toppling angle with one landing; with the tendon it reaches 27 per cent of its toppling angle with eight landings; with tendon and bars it reaches 12 per cent of its toppling angle with 43 landings. With its bars it comes to rest upright. The landings are where the bare wall loses energy; the bars add a loss that does not wait for a landing.

A wall that is allowed to lift

A block that rocks inherits everything that decides whether it survives — a restoring moment set by its weight and shape that falls as it leans, and a loss of energy set by its proportions at each landing. Put a tendon through a wall and yielding bars across its base and both become design quantities, and the ratio between them decides whether the wall comes home.

dynamics · Rocking

The tendon that forgets its prestress

A rocking wall comes home because a tendon pulls it, and the tendon must not yield — yet the rotations that test the wall are exactly the ones that stretch it. Past its yield, the force a tendon keeps is its yield force less its stiffness times the stretch, whatever it was prestressed to, so the guarantee a design needs is a limit on rotation, and more prestress only reaches that limit sooner.

dynamics · Rocking

It tips inside its own hull

On rigid ground a body tips when its resultant reaches the edge of its base, and how stiff its supports are has nothing to do with it. On pads that settle, the body leans as it is pushed, the lean moves its weight, and the push that tips it falls by one number a site engineer already has: settlement times the height of the weight, over the square of the half-width. Toward a corner the loss doubles, and one soft pad makes the weakest direction one nobody checks.

equilibrium · Overturning

The ballast that helps it over

On rigid ground a heavier block is harder to tip, in exact proportion to its weight — that is the whole of the overturning check. On ground with a bearing capacity it is not. The toe presses the ground to its limit, the weight's lever arm shrinks as the yielded block under the toe grows, and the tipping push peaks when the block weighs half of what the ground under it can bear. Past that, every tonne of ballast added to steady it brings it closer to going over.

equilibrium · Overturning

The ground that arrives after the weight

A block's resistance to tipping on ground that can yield is a parabola in its weight, with its peak at half of what the ground can bear. On soft clay the ground's capacity is not fixed: it grows as the clay drains under the weight, and it grows years after the weight has arrived. A tower on such ground is at its weakest on the day it is finished — 1.33 against the 1.93 it will have once the clay has drained — and a silo filled in a week walks over the top of the parabola and down the far side, which is the other way a structure can be built.

equilibrium · Overturning

The ground that never quite gives way

On a bed of springs capped at the ground's bearing limit, a block pushed sideways tips at a definite push, below the limit the rigid-plastic parabola gives. Real ground is curved: it softens all the way to its limit and never quite reaches it. On such ground the block has no tipping push of its own. Its resistance creeps toward the limit, and the peak it does have is made by its own weight leaning with it — 14 per cent below the limit with the weight 5 m up, nearly at it with the weight at the base, where the lean simply runs away.

equilibrium · Overturning

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

EquilibriumFree bodyFactor of safetyStabilityFrictionRockingSelf-weightBearing pressureEccentricityEnergy dissipationKernUplift

All concepts