Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Concept

Kern — where it appears

The region a compressive resultant must land in if no part of a section is to be pulled, a sixth of the depth for a rectangle. It is a sixth of the depth for a rectangle, which is where the middle-third rule comes from, and it contains no strength at all.

Named by 11 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Weight is the only thing holding it down. A body 2.5 m wide and 6 m tall weighing 120 kN, under a wind pressure of 1 kN/m². The wind delivers 48 kN and an overturning moment of 144 kNm about the leeward toe; the weight restores 150 kNm, a factor of 1.04. The resultant lands 1.20 m from the centre against a middle third of ±0.42 m, so the base is lifting over 2.35 m of its width.

Weight is the only thing resisting it

A structure that is strong enough everywhere can still be blown over, and nothing in its material properties has any part in whether it is. The whole answer is a weight and a width — and the failure begins long before anything tips, at the moment one edge stops pressing down.

equilibrium · Overturning Two triangles that cross zero, and a block that does not. Stress across a 300 × 700 mm section at each stage, compression positive. The prestress alone gives -6.33 MPa at the top and 20.61 at the bottom; at transfer, with only self-weight on it, the top is at -2.47 MPa and in service the section runs from 7.61 to 3.82 MPa — compression everywhere. The same beam with no prestress reaches -12.67 MPa at the bottom fibre, which is 4.2 times what the concrete can hold.

The load put on backwards

Every other structure in this collection waits for its load and then resists it. A prestressed one is given a load first — chosen, permanent, and pointing the wrong way — so that when the real one arrives the two nearly cancel and the material never has to do the thing it is bad at.

internal-forces · Prestress The middle third, computed. The kern of a 400 × 600 mm rectangle, computed by asking, for every direction, how far the resultant can move before the far face would be pulled. It reaches ±100.0 mm vertically and ±66.7 mm horizontally, which are h/6 and b/6 exactly, and the region between is a rhombus rather than the ellipse the two numbers suggest — a resultant on a diagonal has less room than either axis allows.

The middle third

A material that cannot be pulled imposes a condition on where the load may land, and the condition is a region rather than a point. For a rectangle it is the famous middle third; for every other section it is a shape nobody quotes, and one ordinary section's is nearly twice as generous as the rule allows.

sections · Kern Four inequalities, and the wedge between them. The Magnel diagram: every limit on a prestressed section, plotted as a bound on 1/P against the eccentricity. Two of the four come from transfer, when the force is largest and the only moment is the beam's own weight, and two from service, when 20% of the force has been lost and the moment is 640 kNm. Each is linear in 1/P, which is the substitution that makes the problem a picture rather than a search. The shaded region is every force-and-eccentricity pair the section will accept: it is a wedge opening to the right, so the cheapest prestress is always at the largest eccentricity the cover allows — 1029 kN at e = 400 mm here. The section's kern is 241 mm, and every useful answer is outside it.

Four inequalities and a wedge

A prestressed section has to satisfy two stress limits when the force is largest and the load smallest, and two more when the force has relaxed and the load has arrived. Each is linear in one over the force — which turns a search for a prestress into a region on a page, and turns an impossible section into an empty one.

sections · Prestress limits The line, and the stone it has to stay inside. A masonry pier 9 m high, 1.6 m thick at the top and battered 12% on its outer face, taking a thrust of 40 kN per metre of run at 25° to the horizontal. The line drawn through it is the locus of the resultant on each horizontal cut: everything above the cut is the free body, and the resultant's position is the moment divided by the vertical force. The dashed pair is the middle third, inside which no tension is implied anywhere on the joint. The line stays inside the stone throughout and reaches the base at 0.503 m from the centre, against a half-width of 1.34 m — but outside the middle third, so part of the base joint is open and the toe is carrying a triangle. Nothing about the strength of the masonry appears anywhere in this figure, and that is the point.

The weight that makes it safer

Every load in this collection makes a structure worse. A pinnacle does not. A masonry pier fails when the line of compression leaves the stonework, and adding weight at the top rotates that line back towards the vertical without adding anything the pier cannot carry — so the stone is not being strengthened, it is being aimed.

structures · Buttress A straight line, and the comfortable case is already two thirds down it. The capacity of a 215 mm masonry wall as a fraction of its squash load, against the eccentricity of the resultant. Nothing in this figure is a buckling calculation. A material that cannot be pulled bears on a strip of width 3(t/2 − e) under a triangular stress block, so the capacity is exactly 1.5f(t − 2e) — a straight line, zero when the resultant reaches the face, and already at 67% at the edge of the kern. The middle third is treated everywhere as the comfortable case; a wall loaded there has given away a third of its capacity before slenderness has been mentioned. The lower line is the same wall with slenderness in it, which enters as an ADDITIONAL eccentricity of 17.4 mm rather than as a reduced stress — h_ef²/2400t, for h_ef = 3000 mm. Euler's load for this wall is 9.6 times what the eccentricity rule allows, which is why no masonry calculation contains it.

It does not buckle, it runs out of width

Every stability failure in this collection is a member that could have carried tension deciding to go sideways instead. Masonry cannot carry tension, and its failure under an eccentric load is not a bifurcation at all — the bearing area simply shrinks until it runs out. The capacity is exactly linear in the eccentricity, Euler's load is ten times anything allowed, and no material property appears until the very end.

stability · Wall slenderness The middle third, computed. The kern of a 300 × 600 mm rectangle, computed by asking, for every direction, how far the resultant can move before the far face would be pulled. It reaches ±100.0 mm vertically and ±50.0 mm horizontally, which are h/6 and b/6 exactly, and the region between is a rhombus rather than the ellipse the two numbers suggest — a resultant on a diagonal has less room than either axis allows.

The strength thrown away on purpose

Masonry, concrete and soil are all analysed as though they had no tensile strength whatever. Each of them has some. The decision to set it to zero is the single most consequential modelling assumption in the subject, it is safe for one kind of check and unsafe for another, and almost nothing that uses it says which.

materials · No tension Weight is the only thing holding it down. A body 1.6 m wide and 4.5 m tall weighing 22 kN, under a wind pressure of 1 kN/m². The wind delivers 2 kN and an overturning moment of 4 kNm about the leeward toe; the weight restores 18 kNm, a factor of 4.35. The resultant lands 0.18 m from the centre against a middle third of ±0.27 m, so the base is still wholly in bearing.

Whether it tips or slides

A free body pushed sideways has two ways of leaving, and which one it takes is decided before any load is known. The condition is a width divided by a height set against a coefficient of friction, and the weight, the wind pressure and the depth of the body all cancel out of it.

equilibrium · Overturning A base plate, and when the bolts start working. A 550 × 450 mm plate carrying 900 kN and 140 kN·m, so the resultant sits 155.56 mm from the centre against a kern of 91.67 mm. The plate is in partial contact: bearing over 358.33 mm at a peak of 11.16 N/mm², with the holding-down bolts carrying 0 kN. The plate lifts at 82.5 kN·m and crushes at 192.95 kN·m, and the bolts are not needed until 247.5 kN·m.

The pinned base that is not pinned

A column base drawn as a pin is a plate bearing on grout, and a plate in contact over its whole length resists rotation whether anybody wanted it to or not. The stiffness it delivers depends on the axial load, so the assumption is one a frame can leave and re-enter as its loads change.

stability · Sway stability The resultant has left the base, and it tips. A body on three supports weighing 60 kN, pushed sideways by 16 kN at a height of 3 m in the plan direction 270°. The push moves the resultant of weight and push 0.80 m from under the weight, and the base — the convex hull of the supports, shaded — lets it go 0.75 m that way before the edge drawn heavy becomes a tipping line: a factor of 0.94, found both along the ray and by moments about that edge. The dashed rosette is the same reach in every direction, from 0.75 m toward the middle of the nearest edge to 1.50 m toward the furthest support. To hold it the support opposite the tipping edge would have to pull 1.3 kN, which a support standing on the ground cannot do, so it lifts and the body turns about that edge.

Half as far between the legs

A body standing on feet, legs or pads has for its base the polygon its supports enclose, and how far its weight can be pushed before it tips depends on which way it is pushed. A three-legged stand pushed toward the gap between two legs has exactly half the reach it has pushed toward one of them.

equilibrium · Overturning Each fibre has to earn its own prestress. For each section on a 12 m span carrying its own weight and 20 kN/m more: bars, the top and bottom moduli it has; ticks, the moduli its two pairs of limits need — the top fibre holding the service compression and the transfer tension, the bottom holding the service tension and the transfer compression, both from the same prestress. The symmetric I: top 28.9 against 17.4 needed, bottom 28.9 against 23.5 (× 10⁶ mm³) — a prestress exists; the tee: top 48.5 against 17.8 needed, bottom 22.7 against 24.0 (× 10⁶ mm³) — no prestress exists; the bulb-tee: top 46.0 against 17.7 needed, bottom 37.4 against 23.8 (× 10⁶ mm³) — a prestress exists.

The flange the prestress cannot use

The four stress limits on a prestressed section pair up by fibre: the bottom fibre has to hold the service tension and the transfer compression from the same force, and the top fibre the service compression and the transfer tension. Each pair is possible only if that fibre's own section modulus is large enough, whatever the eccentricity. On a symmetric section the two pairs are close to balanced. On a tee they are not: its wide flange multiplies the top fibre's modulus and hardly touches the bottom's, so a tee with half as much concrete again as a symmetric I cannot be prestressed for a load the I carries.

sections · Prestress limits

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

EccentricityBearing pressureFree bodySelf-weightEquilibriumOverturningFactor of safetyMasonryNo tensionPrestressPrestress lossesSection modulus

All concepts