Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Concept

Impulse — where it appears

The area under a force-time curve, which is what a structure responds to when the load is over before it has begun to move. For a load over before the structure has begun to move, only its area matters and its shape does not, which is why a blast is described by an impulse and a wind by a pressure.

Named by 14 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

20 kN applied at once and held, on a structure of 0.500 s period. Displacement against time for a single-degree-of-freedom structure of natural period 0.500 s and 2.0% damping, under 20 kN applied at once and held. The static deflection under the same peak force is 12.67 mm and the peak response is 24.56 mm — a factor of 1.94.

Twice the deflection, for the same load

A weight placed gently on a beam deflects it by one amount. The same weight let go from rest, a millimetre above the same beam, deflects it by twice as much — and the factor of two is exact, for every structure ever built.

dynamics · Dynamic amplification What a drop height is worth, as a factor on the answer for a weight placed slowly. The peak displacement as a multiple of the static deflection, against the height a weight is dropped from divided by the deflection that weight causes when it is placed. The curve is 1 + √(1 + 2h/δ), which is conservation of energy and nothing else: the weight does work over the height it falls PLUS the distance the structure then gives, and the structure stores work only over the second. At a ratio of 40 the factor is 10.00, and at zero it is exactly 2 — the marked point, where a dropped weight becomes a placed one.

The weight that was dropped

A half-tonne load lowered onto a beam produces 5 kN. The same load dropped one metre onto the same beam produces 160 kN — and onto a beam ten times softer, 54 kN. The stiff structure is the one that suffers, which is the opposite of nearly every other rule about structures.

dynamics · Impact factor What the shape of a load in time is worth, for two load shapes. The peak displacement as a multiple of the static deflection, against the load's duration divided by the structure's natural period, for two load shapes: a load that rises linearly, then stays; a rectangular pulse, then nothing. The lines are closed forms and eight dots are the peak of a complete time integration of an oscillator of 0.300 s period under that load, agreeing with the line to within 0.19% everywhere.

The load that is over before it has moved

A blast delivers an enormous pressure for a few milliseconds. Everything else in this field asks what force a structure can carry; a load that has come and gone before the structure has travelled any distance is not asking that question, and the answer turns out to depend on the mass and the ductility with the strength barely in it.

dynamics · Blast A restoring moment that gets smaller the further it leans. Restoring moment against rotation for a block 0.90 m wide and 4.20 m tall, both normalised — the moment by its value at first uplift, the rotation by the angle α = 12.1° at which the block topples. It is mgR·sin(α − θ), which is a weight times a geometry with no material property in it at all, and it has two features an elastic system does not. There is a jump at the origin: the moment is whatever the ground demands until uplift and then it is mgR sinα, so the law is discontinuous where a spring's is steepest. And the slope is negative — the further it leans the less it pushes back — so the equilibrium at θ = 0 is stable only because of that jump, and there is no stiffness to divide into a mass. The straight line is what a spring of the same first-uplift strength would have done.

The block that is safer for being bigger

A block resting on the ground lifts off at an acceleration that depends only on its shape and not at all on its size, and then falls over at one that depends strongly on its size. Two objects of identical proportion begin rocking at the same instant and only the smaller one topples — which is why the slender water towers stood in Chile and the squat tanks beside them did not.

dynamics · Rocking One pulse, two blocks of the same shape. Rotation as a fraction of the toppling angle, under a single 0.8 s sine pulse of 1.00 g, for two blocks of identical proportion whose sizes differ by a factor of 3. Both lift off at the same instant, because uplift depends on the shape alone. The small one reaches the toppling angle and goes over; the large one reaches 46%. The kinks are impacts: there is no dashpot anywhere in this model, and the only energy the block loses is lost when it lands on its other corner, at a velocity ratio of 0.926 per landing — 14% of the energy each time, decided by the block's shape and by nothing else.

The only damping is the landing

A rocking block has no dashpot in it. The only energy it ever loses is lost at the instant it lands on its other corner, and how much is a property of the block's proportions — 14 per cent for a slender one and 38 for a stocky one. That single number decides whether it settles or goes over, and a real base does not deliver the value the theory computes.

dynamics · Rocking The same pulse on a wall that is designed to rock. Rotation as a fraction of the toppling angle under one 0.8 s sine pulse of 1.00 g, for the same 2.0 × 8.0 m wall of 400 kN three ways. Bare, it lifts at 0.250 g; with a 600 kN tendon it lifts at 0.625 g. The bare wall reaches 79 per cent of its toppling angle with one landing; with the tendon it reaches 27 per cent of its toppling angle with eight landings; with tendon and bars it reaches 12 per cent of its toppling angle with 43 landings. With its bars it comes to rest upright. The landings are where the bare wall loses energy; the bars add a loss that does not wait for a landing.

A wall that is allowed to lift

A block that rocks inherits everything that decides whether it survives — a restoring moment set by its weight and shape that falls as it leans, and a loss of energy set by its proportions at each landing. Put a tendon through a wall and yielding bars across its base and both become design quantities, and the ratio between them decides whether the wall comes home.

dynamics · Rocking One collision, four contact laws, one impulse. Contact force against time for one collision between 500 t and 300 t closing at 1.94 m/s, under four contact laws sharing one contact constant of 2.8×10^9 N/m^1.5. The elastic linear spring peaks at 19.7 MN and lasts 58 ms; the Hertz law peaks at 22.0 MN over 61 ms. Set to a restitution of 0.65, the spring and dashpot peaks at 16.8 MN and ends pulling at 3.5 MN, a tension two faces in contact cannot carry, while the damped Hertz law peaks at 20.1 MN and returns a restitution of 0.77 instead. The areas under the curves are the impulses: 600 kN·s for the spring and dashpot, which is what momentum requires at 0.65, 646 for the damped Hertz law, and 727 for both elastic laws.

The force that belongs to the model

When two buildings meet, momentum decides what each of them feels, and no contact law can change it. What the contact law decides is the force, and the force it reports is the contact stiffness somebody assumed, raised to a power. Four laws and a hundredfold change of stiffness move the buildings by a few per cent and the force by a factor of eight.

dynamics · Pounding A filler sets the force, until it runs out of thickness. Contact force against the movement since first touch for one collision between 500 t and 300 t on a 40 mm filler crushing at 4 MPa over 5 m², 60 per cent of it crushable, at closing speeds of 1.00, 1.94 and 2.85 m/s. The filler loads elastically, then crushes at 20.0 MN for as long as it has thickness to give. At 1.00 m/s it crushes 4 mm and the force never passes 20.0 MN; at 1.94 m/s it crushes 17 mm and the force never passes 20.0 MN; at 2.85 m/s it crushes all 24 mm it can and the faces meet through it, peaking at 23.7 MN. Dashed, the bare contact at 2.85 m/s peaks at 35.0 MN.

The force a filler can promise

A crushable filler in the gap between two buildings replaces a contact stiffness nobody knows with a crush strength somebody chose, and the force of a collision becomes that strength — for as long as the filler has thickness left to crush. Energy decides how much thickness that has to be, and in a gap sized for buildings that were never meant to meet it is not much.

dynamics · Pounding Two blows on three foundations. The movement of a 150 tonne block struck by a hammer delivering 18 kN·s, twice, 0.75 s apart. On soil at 12.5 Hz with the 47 per cent of damping a half-space radiates, the block moves 0.86 mm and is still before the second blow. On the same soil over shallow rock, with 5 per cent, it moves 1.42 mm and rings for the whole interval. On springs at 4.0 Hz it moves 4.42 mm, and its ringing has not died when the second blow arrives. The peak force passed to the ground is 1.34, 1.32 and 0.42 MN: the heavily damped block and the lightly damped one pass almost the same force.

The blow that has no frequency

A forge hammer does not shake its foundation; it strikes it. The transmissibility curve every isolation design is drawn on has nothing to say about a blow, and the rules it teaches mislead. The force a struck block passes to the ground is least at a quarter of critical damping, not the most; five per cent and forty-seven pass almost the same; and the springs that soften every blow can bring the block down to the hammer's own rate and make a train of blows ring four times as high as one.

dynamics · Vibration isolation The same blow, three seats under the anvil. The movement of the block — the part of a 150 t hammer foundation, 30 t of it the anvil, that lies below the pad — after one blow of 18 kN·s on the anvil, over three periods of the whole foundation on soil (12.5 Hz, damping 0.47). Rigid seat: largest movement 0.86 mm at 16 ms; pad at 4.0 times: largest movement 1.14 mm at 13 ms; pad tuned to the foundation: largest movement 1.18 mm at 35 ms. On the pad at 4.0 times the block rides the anvil's ringing: a ripple at the anvil's own frequency on top of the foundation's swing, whose first crest lands near the swing's peak. On the tuned pad the block receives the blow as one slow push, peaks later and higher, and then goes on ringing long after the rigid seat has settled, because the mode in which anvil and block swing against each other is damped by the pad and hardly at all by the ground.

The pad that makes the blow worse

A forge hammer's anvil sits on a pad on its foundation block, and the pad looks like isolation: a spring between the blow and everything below it. For the block it is the opposite. Every pad an anvil can sit on makes the block move more than a rigid seat would, by half again when the pad is tuned near the foundation, and what the pad buys instead is a smaller force under the anvil. The hope that a tuned pad could act as a tuned mass works only against a train of blows, and only at a softness the anvil cannot live with.

dynamics · Vibration isolation What the soft layer costs the strong one. For a 40 mm filler whose outer 50 per cent is the soft layer, the least crush force its inner layer must have for the filler to stop a collision at 2.85 m/s — 761 kJ — without running out, against the soft layer's crush stress. The uniform filler that just does it crushes at 31.7 MN; every softer outer layer needs a stronger inner one, and at 1.5 MPa outside the inner layer needs 56.0 MN. The bare concrete's contact at that speed is 35.0 MN (dashed): only an outer layer of at least 5.7 MPa keeps the inner one below it.

The filler that cannot be gentle twice

A crushable filler in the gap between two buildings caps a collision at its crush force, but a filler soft enough to make the everyday contacts gentle runs out on the hardest one. Grade it — soft at the face, strong behind — and the soft layer takes the small contacts while the strong layer stops the large. The energy says otherwise. Every kilojoule the soft layer does not absorb, the strong layer must, in less depth: in a 40 mm filler, an outer half at 1.5 MPa needs an inner half at 56 MN, far above the 35 MN of the bare concrete it was meant to improve on.

dynamics · Pounding A filler that knows the speed meets the collision hardest at its start. The contact force against the depth crushed in the hardest collision, 500 t and 300 t closing at 2.85 m/s with 761 kJ, on a 40 mm filler between 500 t and 300 t, crushable over 24 mm: uniform (dashed), with 50 per cent of its strength at that speed depending on the speed, and with all of it. Each is as strong as it must be to stop the collision in 24 mm. Uniform: 30.5 MN at first contact; 50 per cent on speed: 38.4 MN at first contact; all on speed: 63.4 MN at first contact. The crushing speed is highest at the first instant and falls to nothing, so a filler whose strength follows it spends its force at the start; the same area under a falling line needs a higher peak than under a level one, and a purely viscous filler's is twice the uniform's.

The filler that knows how fast it is hit

A filler graded through its depth meets the small collisions softly and the hard one with a strong layer that has to be very strong, because every kilojoule the soft layer misses must be absorbed in less depth. A filler whose strength rises with the speed it is crushed at ranks collisions by speed instead, with no layers at all, and treats the middling collisions better than grading does. But it meets every collision hardest at its first instant, when the crushing speed is greatest, and a force that falls as the collision proceeds needs a higher peak to absorb the same energy in the same depth. A purely viscous filler that stops the hardest collision in 24 mm hits it with exactly twice the force of a uniform one.

dynamics · Pounding The forging is a pad nobody designed. For a 2.0 t tup at 7.0 m/s, 49 kJ, on the 150 t foundation with its 30 t anvil on a pad: the largest force through the anvil's pad (solid) against the forging's flow force (logarithmic), with the dies meeting at the right; dashed, the pad force if the same impulse arrived all at once, as a fixed-impulse calculation takes it. Through a forging flowing at 0.1 MN the pad carries 0.15 MN, against 3.70 for the same impulse delivered at once; at 1.5 MN, 2.32 against 3.93; with the dies meeting, 5.86 against 5.93.

The forging that cushions the blow

A forge hammer's foundation is usually designed for a blow treated as a fixed impulse: the tup's momentum, multiplied by a factor for its rebound. The blow is not fixed. Between the tup and the anvil lies a hot forging, a plastic body that flows under the tup, stretches the blow to 48 milliseconds and absorbs nearly all of its 49 kJ, so that the anvil's pad feels 0.46 MN. As the part cools it flows less, the blow shortens, the tup rebounds, and the pad force climbs to 5.86 MN when the dies meet with nothing between them. The foundation is designed by the blow that does no work.

dynamics · Vibration isolation Where each filler's depth goes. The crushable depth left in each filler between buildings of 500 t and 300 t, periods 0.8 and 1.2 s, 50 mm apart, through a record of six one-second sine cycles peaking at 0.35 g, for 40 mm fillers crushable over 24 mm, each just strong enough to stop a 2.85 m/s collision from new. Uniform: 5 mm when its hardest contact arrives at 2.76 m/s, 0 mm at the end. Graded: 12 mm when its hardest contact arrives at 2.76 m/s, 6 mm at the end. 50% on speed: 0 mm when its hardest contact arrives at 2.88 m/s, 0 mm at the end. The graded filler's soft layer goes in the first middling contacts and its strong layer is barely reached; the other two lose depth to every middling contact and have little or none left when the largest arrives.

The filler that is used up before the worst

A crushable filler between two buildings is sized for the hardest collision it might meet, meeting it new. An earthquake does not oblige: the hardest contact arrives after a dozen middling ones, and each has taken some of the depth. Through a record of six cycles, a filler half of whose strength follows its crushing speed is dense before the worst contact arrives, and a uniform one has five millimetres left. A graded filler still has twelve. Yet the graded filler meets the worst contact at 56 MN and the spent rate-sensitive one at 39. Keeping depth is not the same as being gentle, and the order of the contacts barely matters.

dynamics · Pounding

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Energy dissipationRestitutionDynamic amplificationNon-linear responsePoundingDampingImpactSeismic gapDuctility demandImpact factorNatural periodOverturning

All concepts