Two-way spanning — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The load a beam is given is a decision
Every beam calculation so far has started with a load per metre, handed over as though it were a property of the beam. It is not. It is the answer to a prior question nobody draws, and two defensible answers to it differ by sixty per cent on the same floor.
The slab that spans both ways
A panel supported on four sides sends its load in two directions at once, and the share is decided by a fourth power — so a panel a third longer than it is wide has already stopped being a two-way slab in any useful sense. What it does at collapse is a different calculation with a different answer.
A third of the load crosses sideways
A slab spanning both ways is usually explained as two beams sharing a load by a fourth power, and the explanation is not merely approximate — it is missing a mechanism. A real plate carries load three ways, and the third one has no beam strip in it: it is twisting, it accounts for a third of the load on a square panel, and it is why the corners lift.
The deck that spans square
A slab bridge crossing a road at an angle is loaded uniformly and does not carry uniformly. Load takes the shortest route between the abutments, which is not the direction the carriageway runs, and the reaction piles up in two corners.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Load pathTorsionTributary areaYield-lineCollapse mechanismCorner upliftCurvatureDeflectionDistributed loadEquilibriumFree bodyLoad descent