Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Concept

Tributary area — where it appears

The part of a floor a beam or column is taken to carry, which is an assumption about the slab rather than a property of the member. It assumes the slab shares load by geometry rather than by stiffness, which is exactly true for a determinate arrangement and an approximation for everything else.

Named by 11 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Where a beam's load comes from. A 8 × 6 m panel carrying 5 kN/m², divided at 45° from the corners. The long beams take a trapezoid of 15.0 m² each and the short beams a triangle of 9.0 m²; the four areas sum to 48.0 m², which is the panel, so no load has been invented or lost. The line loads quoted are the uniform equivalents; the real distributions peak at 15.00 kN/m at midspan.

The load a beam is given is a decision

Every beam calculation so far has started with a load per metre, handed over as though it were a property of the beam. It is not. It is the answer to a prior question nobody draws, and two defensible answers to it differ by sixty per cent on the same floor.

equilibrium · Tributary area A two-way slab is a one-way slab as soon as it is not square. The share of the load carried by the strips spanning the short way, against the ratio of the sides. The two families of strips cross at the centre and must deflect equally there, and a strip's deflection goes as the fourth power of its span — so at a ratio of 1.33 the short strips already take 76% and at 2 they take 94%. The panel drawn here is 6 × 8 m, a ratio of 1.33, and its short strips take 76.0%. Two-way action is worth having at a ratio of one and worth almost nothing by two.

The slab that spans both ways

A panel supported on four sides sends its load in two directions at once, and the share is decided by a fourth power — so a panel a third longer than it is wide has already stopped being a two-way slab in any useful sense. What it does at collapse is a different calculation with a different answer.

structures · Two-way spanning Two beams tied together, and the deeper one takes 89% of the load. Two simply supported beams of 6 m, one twice as deep as the other, tied together at midspan so that they have to move as one. A load of 100 kN stands on the tie. Point stiffness is 48EI/L³, so the deeper beam is 8 times as stiff — depth cubed, nothing else — and the load divides in that ratio: 11.1 kN into the shallow beam and 88.9 kN into the deep one, 11% against 89%. Both midspan points move 5.00 mm, which is the whole of the argument: the geometry of the load never entered it. The deflection is drawn 78 times full size — the real sag is 5.00 mm on a 6 m span, about 1 in 1200.

The stiffest path takes the load

When two members share a force the split can be argued about. When they share a displacement it cannot — stiffness settles it, and nothing about the load or the plan drawing gets a vote. The consequence is that stiffening a lightly loaded member raises its stress, and the way to unload something is to soften it.

internal-forces · Load-sharing A check made on a perimeter, not on a section. One bay of a flat slab, 7.2 m square, on a 400 × 400 mm column. The heavy closed line is the control perimeter, 2d from the column face with its corners rounded at that radius — 4427 mm long against 1600 mm round the column itself. The shaded area inside it delivers no shear across it and is subtracted from the load; everything outside arrives through the perimeter. At 12 kN/m² that is 604 kN across 4427 × 225 mm, a shear stress of 0.606 N/mm² against a resistance of 0.658.

A check made on a perimeter, not on a section

Every shear check in this collection is made on a plane cut through a member. A slab sitting on a column has no such plane, because the shear leaves in every direction at once — so the check is made on a closed line, and a line grows with the column while the load grows with the square of the bay.

internal-forces · Punching shear Whether the floor shares the load out by stiffness or by area. The share of a uniform storey force taken by each of three equally stiff walls, against the stiffness of the floor plate that spans between them. A plate far stiffer than the walls translates almost rigidly, every wall deflects the same and the share is the ratio of stiffnesses — 60% to the middle wall here, the same as everyone else. A plate far softer than the walls behaves as a continuous beam over them and the middle wall takes 33%. Neither end is the tributary-area answer of 50%, which assumes a plate that is both soft and discontinuous over the wall, and which nothing here ever reaches.

The floor is a beam lying down

A floor plate spans horizontally between the walls that resist a lateral load, carries a distributed inertia load, and has chords, a web and a span-to-depth ratio like any other beam. Its stiffness decides whether the walls share the load by their stiffness or by the area of floor nearest them — and the familiar tributary answer turns out to be neither limit.

structures · Diaphragm The snow that left the roof is standing against the wall. A roof in section with a 1.0 m obstruction at its downwind end, drawn with the vertical scale exaggerated 4 times because a metre of snow on twenty metres of roof is thinner than the line it would be drawn with. The balanced layer is 0.48 kN/m² everywhere; the wedge against the wall holds the snow that 30% of the 20 m upwind gave up, so its area is fixed by conservation of mass rather than chosen. That makes it 0.85 m deep and 3.4 m long, with a peak load of 2.60 kN/m² — 5.4 times the balanced value, and still only 27% of the snow on the roof. An intensity several times the design load, made of a quantity nobody would notice had moved.

The load that arrives where the wind stops

Snow is the one load a structure is given rather than subjected to. What falls is spread evenly over a whole region; what a member carries is whatever the wind left above it, and the wind piles it against whatever gets in the way. The heaviest patch on a roof is usually a quarter of the snow on it.

equilibrium · Snow drift Deflection goes as the fourth power of the span. Deflection against span for a constant load intensity and section, with two slower relationships drawn faintly behind it for comparison: the load itself, which grows in proportion to the span, and the bending moment, which grows as its square. Doubling the span multiplies the deflection by sixteen, while the moment only quadruples.

The weight that has to be known before it can be found

Every other load arrives from outside and can be looked up. A structure's own weight depends on how big it is, and how big it is depends on the load — so the first calculation on any project is a fixed point, and the fraction of a member spent carrying itself turns out to be the square of its span as a fraction of a span it can never reach.

equilibrium · Dead load Independence, and the floor it never goes below. The reduction factor a column is allowed, two ways. The Eurocode storey rule falls to 0.70 and stops. The independence argument — n bays each with a mean and a standard deviation, summed — gives (1 + zv/√n)/(1 + zv), which falls faster and stops at 0.503: a floor with no n in it at all, decided only by how variable the load is and how far out the fractile is drawn. The mean is never reduced away, because every bay really does carry its mean. At ten storeys the two differ by 10.0 points.

The load that is never all there at once

A column at the bottom of twenty storeys is designed for the imposed load of twenty floors added up, and twenty floors do not reach their own worst day together. The reduction that follows is not a discount on the safety margin. It is the central limit theorem, and it has a floor it never goes below.

equilibrium · Live load reduction Every level added is a longer span, not a shorter one. Steel per square metre of floor against the number of levels in the hierarchy, for a 12 m bay with a deck that can span 3.0 m. A bending level's weight per unit area is 3ρqrL/8σ — it contains the SPAN and not the spacing — so breaking a floor into more levels cannot make the members lighter by making them closer together. It adds one more system, and the last system always spans the whole bay: a second level costs 52 per cent more steel than one, and a third 107 per cent. The structural zone grows with it, 730 mm to 1346 mm. Hierarchy is not an economy, it is a way of reaching, and it is paid for in both currencies at once.

Every level is a longer span

A floor is a hierarchy — deck to joists to beams to girders — and the reason usually given is that breaking a long span into short ones saves material. A bending level's weight per square metre contains its span and not its spacing, so it does not.

structures · Hierarchy The column under the first interior support is given a quarter more. Two equal spans of 8.0 m carrying 5.0 kN/m, continuous over three supports. The tributary rule gives each interior support one span's worth of load, 40.0 kN, and each end support half of that. The continuous beam gives 15.0 kN, 50.0 kN, 15.0 kN — ratios of 0.75, 1.25, 0.75 to what the areas say. The reactions still add to the whole load, because they must; what has moved is which support gets it. The end supports are relieved because the span next to them hogs over the first interior support, lifting their end of it.

The column given more than its rectangle

The tributary rule draws a rectangle round each column and hands it whatever stands inside. A floor is continuous over its columns, and a continuous beam does not give each support the load above it — the first interior one takes a quarter more and the end ones a quarter less. On a grid the two directions multiply, and two columns on the same floor differ by a factor of nearly three.

equilibrium · Tributary area One quantity, three names. The middle braced bay's share of the storey force (solid) and one end bay's (dashed), for a 48 by 12 m plate, 200 mm of concrete, spanning two 24 m bays between three braced bays of 100,000 kN/m each, under 40 kN/m, against a factor on the plate's stiffness as built, on a logarithmic scale. The share moves continuously from 61 per cent, a continuous plate on unyielding supports, to 33 per cent, the rigid plate. Left of 0.02 (shaded) ASCE 7 calls the plate flexible and assigns tributary shares, 50 per cent to the middle; the plate there actually gives it 59 per cent at the boundary. Right of 1.54 (shaded) EN 1998-1 calls it rigid and assigns stiffness shares, 33 per cent; at that boundary the plate gives 37. The plate as built, factor 1, gives 38 per cent to the middle and 31 to each end.

Rigid by one code and not by the other

A floor plate between shear walls shares its storey force out in proportions that move continuously with its stiffness, from a continuous beam's to a rigid body's. The codes put it in one of two boxes and use a different model in each. ASCE 7 and EN 1998-1 draw their boxes' edges a hundred times apart in plate stiffness, each at a point where its own licensed model already misstates the middle wall by about a tenth — and an ordinary 200 mm slab sits in the gap between them.

structures · Diaphragm

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Load pathLoad-sharingFree bodySelf-weightSpan-to-depthContinuityDiaphragmDistributed loadEnvelopeIn-plane stiffnessLoad descentSection modulus

All concepts