Timber — where it appears
Named by 11 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The material that has a direction
Every material in this collection so far has had one modulus and one strength. Timber has three of each, differing by more than an order of magnitude, and the consequence is not a correction to steel design — it is a different set of checks with a different one governing.
The smallest of six failures
Everything else in this collection that fails does so in one way at a time. A dowel through timber does not — the wood can crush while the steel stays straight, or one plastic hinge can form in it, or two — and the capacity is the smallest of the six, which is the kinematic theorem of plasticity applied to a joint rather than to a frame.
The ranking belongs to the load case
Every table of material properties ever printed ranks by strength, and every one of them answers a question nobody asked. What a structure wants is the least mass for a stated performance, and the combination of properties that gives it changes with the shape of the member — so timber beats steel four to one as a beam and loses to it as a tie, without either material changing.
The load that was left on too long
A timber beam that carries a load for fifty years fails at about fifty-nine per cent of the stress the same beam carries for five minutes in a testing machine. Nothing about the load varies, the member need not have deflected, and the relation between the two is a straight line on a logarithmic time axis over ten decades.
The shear that decides a timber beam
A steel beam is never governed by shear, because its bending strength is only 1.73 times its shear strength and no beam is that short. Timber's ratio is 6.7 along the grain and 23 across it, so shear governs at proportions people build every day.
The pull that Johansen left out
Johansen's mechanisms treat a timber fastener as a beam in a bed of crushing wood, bent and pushed sideways and nothing else. A real fastener that tilts across the joint is also pulled along its own axis, and if a washer or a thread resists the pull, it clamps the two members together and adds to what the joint can carry. The addition is a quarter of the axial resistance, it goes only to the modes in which the fastener tilts, and it is capped by fastener type — nothing for a dowel, a quarter for a bolt, all of it for a screw — which is how a screw keeps gaining strength past the thickness at which Johansen's capacity stops.
The screw that is pulled instead of bent
A screw square to a timber joint resists slip by bending, and its thread is engaged only when it has tilted far enough to be pulled. Lean the same screw to 45 degrees and the slip pulls it from the first millimetre. An 8 mm screw through two 100 mm members goes from 5.9 kN to 13.4, reached after 2.2 mm of slip instead of more than twelve, and the bending that Johansen's model is about becomes an eighth of the joint. The price is a joint that holds one way better than the other.
Twenty screws that peak together
A leaning screw reaches its peak at two millimetres of slip and then lets go, so a row of twenty along the grain looks like the long bolted joint again — the end screws past their peak and falling while the middle ones have barely started. Follow the row slip by slip and it is not: in a member of ordinary depth twenty leaning screws carry 98 per cent of twenty times one, against the 74 per cent the effective-number rule allows. What decides it is one ratio — the slip the timber's stretch spreads along the row against the width of a screw's peak — and the rule is right only for a brittle thread in a thin member.
The row that remembers its overload
A row of twenty leaning screws reaches 98% of twenty screws' peak, once. Loaded again, a screw that has been past its peak comes back along a softer path and reaches the slip it had been to with less load than it carried there. So a row loaded again and again neither simply evens out nor simply ratchets down: below 0.965 of its first peak it settles after a few cycles with the middle screws catching up, and above it the end screws are pushed back onto their curve every cycle, lose a little more each time, and the row fails at a load it carried the first time. One large overload costs it less than many smaller ones near the peak.
The notch that costs more than its depth
Cut a timber beam's underside away at the support, so that half its depth sits on the bearing, and a stress check on what is left says the end has lost half its shear strength. The beam says otherwise. A crack starts at the notch's corner and runs along the grain, and whether it runs is a question of energy, not stress — so the answer has a size in it. A 400 mm glulam beam notched to half its depth keeps a quarter of its shear resistance, an 800 mm one keeps 18 per cent, and the deeper the beam the less a notch leaves. Sloping the notch buys much of it back, and moving the corner away from the support costs it again.
The row that is pushed as often as it is pulled
A row of leaning screws in a shear wall is loaded one way by the wind and then the other, and a screw that leans is pulled along its axis one way and pushed the other. Pulled, its axial force clamps the joint and friction helps it; pushed, it prises the joint open and the friction goes. So the row has a weaker side, and under a reversing load it settles exactly as it settles under a repeated one — the reversal does not start the ratchet again — but at a ceiling the pushed side sets, 0.79 of the pulled peak against 0.97. And it settles with a gap in the middle that every reversal crosses carrying nothing.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Embedment strengthAnisotropyDuctilityBearingJohansen modelFrictionGrainPlastic hingeClamping forceElastic modulusFree bodyLoad path