Embedment strength — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as johansen model — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
The smallest of six failures
Everything else in this collection that fails does so in one way at a time. A dowel through timber does not — the wood can crush while the steel stays straight, or one plastic hinge can form in it, or two — and the capacity is the smallest of the six, which is the kinematic theorem of plasticity applied to a joint rather than to a frame.
The pull that Johansen left out
Johansen's mechanisms treat a timber fastener as a beam in a bed of crushing wood, bent and pushed sideways and nothing else. A real fastener that tilts across the joint is also pulled along its own axis, and if a washer or a thread resists the pull, it clamps the two members together and adds to what the joint can carry. The addition is a quarter of the axial resistance, it goes only to the modes in which the fastener tilts, and it is capped by fastener type — nothing for a dowel, a quarter for a bolt, all of it for a screw — which is how a screw keeps gaining strength past the thickness at which Johansen's capacity stops.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
BearingJohansen modelPlastic hingeTimberAnisotropyBound theoremsClamping forceCollapse loadConnection designDowel yieldDuctilityFree body