Notional load — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The load that makes itself worse
A structure that has leaned carries its weight off the axis, which makes it lean further. The amplification is one over one minus the load ratio, and it runs away long before the buckling load.
The load that is really a lean
No frame is ever plumb. The columns are out of upright by something like a three-hundredth, and every tonne of gravity load standing on that lean has a horizontal component. The force that represents it is not a safety allowance — it is an exact statics substitution for a geometry nobody drew.
The column that leans on its neighbours
A column with a pinned base and a pinned top has no lateral stiffness at all and cannot stand up alone, and yet thousands of them do. What holds them is the rest of the storey, and what it costs is paid by whichever columns do have stiffness — whose effective length rises as the square root of the load being leaned on them, straight off the end of every chart.
Counted, not checked
A column with pinned ends and no bracing cannot buckle on its own, so nothing about it fails a stability check. It still carries load, and load with no stiffness attached lowers the buckling load of everything around it — which is why a gravity-only column is put on the frame model and never designed by itself.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
P-deltaBracingCritical loadEffective lengthFree bodyImperfectionEccentricityLateral systemSecond-orderSecond-order effectsSway stabilityAmplification