Half-wavelength — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Held everywhere, and it forgets its length
A brace at a point divides a member's buckling length. A restraint spread along the whole member does something else — the member chooses its own number of half-waves, and past a few of them the critical load stops depending on the length at all.
The mode between the two that get checked
A thin-walled strut has three ways of buckling and two of them have design rules. The third has a half-wavelength several times the section depth, a shape in which the fold lines themselves move, and an elastic stress that no effective-width calculation can produce.
Four was never a fact about plates
The coefficient every plate calculation starts from is quoted as 4, derived nowhere and remembered by everyone. It is the minimum of a quantity that has nothing to do with plates in it — and what the plate supplies is not the four but the restriction that produces the scallops around it.
A row of frames is not a foundation
The top chord of a half-through girder is held sideways by U-frames, and the standard calculation smears them into a continuous elastic foundation. That is right while the frames are close and quietly wrong once they are not. The crossover sits at seven-tenths of the buckle's own half-wavelength, whatever the frames' stiffness — and beyond it the chord buckles between frames at a load no stiffening of the frames can raise.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Elastic foundationBracingBucklingContinuous restraintEffective widthEigenvaluePlate bucklingSlendernessU-frameBoundary conditionsBuckled mode shapeBuckling coefficient