Endurance limit — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The load that never came near failing anything
A detail survives sixty-eight million cycles at a stress range that another detail in the same steel survives two hundred and seventy thousand of. The two lie a factor of two hundred and fifty apart, and the material is not on the plot anywhere.
The detail decides and the steel does not
A fatigue check contains no material strength anywhere. The same detail in a steel twice as strong lies on exactly the same line, because a fatigue life is decided by the geometry of a weld and by the stress range it sees — and two per cent of the traffic does most of the damage, because life goes as the inverse cube of the range.
The cycles that do not count
A fatigue spectrum has to be reduced to one number, and the reduction is a cube-weighted average rather than an ordinary one. Two per cent of the traffic does most of the damage, ninety per cent of it does none at all, and the equivalent range that comes out is nearer the heaviest vehicle than the average one.
The cut-off belongs to the water
An S-N curve's cut-off is the most consequential thing on it: on a category 71 detail under ordinary bridge traffic it deletes ninety per cent of the crossings and leaves two bands doing all the damage. It is a property of steel in air. A crack tip that seawater or de-icing salt can reach has no threshold, no endurance limit and no knee, and the same bridge's life runs from 300 years to 45 depending on which of six defensible calculations is asked.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
FatigueCrack growthDetail categoryMiners ruleStress rangeCut-off limitInspectionResidual stressSpectrumStress concentrationCorrosionCycle counting