Stress range — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The load that never came near failing anything
A detail survives sixty-eight million cycles at a stress range that another detail in the same steel survives two hundred and seventy thousand of. The two lie a factor of two hundred and fifty apart, and the material is not on the plot anywhere.
The detail decides and the steel does not
A fatigue check contains no material strength anywhere. The same detail in a steel twice as strong lies on exactly the same line, because a fatigue life is decided by the geometry of a weld and by the stress range it sees — and two per cent of the traffic does most of the damage, because life goes as the inverse cube of the range.
Designed to be found in time
A fatigue design that promises a detail will not crack is making a claim about a hundred years of traffic. A damage-tolerant one assumes it will crack, and sets the inspection interval from how long a crack takes to grow from the smallest size anybody can find to the largest the section can survive.
The cycles that do not count
A fatigue spectrum has to be reduced to one number, and the reduction is a cube-weighted average rather than an ordinary one. Two per cent of the traffic does most of the damage, a third of it does none at all, and the equivalent range that comes out is nearer the heaviest vehicle than the average one.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Detail categoryFatigueCrack growthEndurance limitInspectionFractureFree bodyMiners ruleResidual stressStress concentrationConstraintCut-off limit