Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Concept

Deflection limit — where it appears

A bound on movement rather than on stress, usually a fraction of the span, which decides a member's size more often than strength does. It has no factor of safety in front of it, so an error in the calculation is an error in the answer rather than an erosion of a margin.

Named by 5 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Which limit arrives first. Utilisation of the strength limit and of the deflection limit, against span. Strength grows as the square of the span and deflection as the fourth power, so the two cross — and past the crossing a beam is sized by how far it moves rather than by what it can carry.

Stiffness is not strength, and usually it is the one that governs

A beam can be nowhere near failure and still be unusable, because it has moved too far. For most long-span members that limit arrives first, and stronger steel does not help at all.

deflection · Serviceability The water that will not run off. Water depth against sag at the middle of the bay, for a roof bay starting with a reversed construction camber of 0.01. There is no critical value to reach: the deflection grows from the first increment, slowly at first and then without bound as the ratio approaches 1.00 — which is the depth at which the bay fills faster than it stiffens, and which the roof bay therefore never attains. The perfect roof bay, drawn for comparison, sits on the vertical axis until it arrives there and then has no answer at all.

The water that will not run off

A flat roof deflects, the deflection makes room for water, the water deepens the deflection. It is the same equation as a buckling column, with rain in place of the axial load.

deflection · Serviceability Four camber rules, and what each leaves on the finished beam. The same 12 m composite beam, cambered against four different things, followed through its own load history. Positive is a sag and negative a hog, and the point at the left of each line is the shape it was fabricated to. Cambering against the wet concrete leaves 12.7 mm of sag at the end and a flat beam on the day the slab is poured; cambering against the total load leaves the beam dead flat when fully loaded and hogged 37.9 mm — one part in 316 of the span — before anything is on it at all.

Built to the wrong shape on purpose

A cambered beam is fabricated curved upward so that load bends it down to something like straight. Nothing in the analysis changes, no stress anywhere is altered, and almost every mistake made with it is a bookkeeping mistake about which loads count.

deflection · Camber The check that depends on a date. Total deflection and the deflection occurring after the brittle finishes are built, for one 12 m beam, against the day those finishes go up. The total barely moves — the beam ends up where it ends up. The increment falls from 32 mm at a week to 14 mm at a year, because creep is fast at first and slow later and a partition built early inherits nearly all of it: 44% of the final creep has already happened by day 28. The span/500 limit is 24 mm and the span/250 limit is 48; this beam passes the first only after day 25. Camber subtracts from both terms of the difference and therefore changes the upper curve and not the lower one, which is the reason a cambered beam can satisfy every total-deflection check and still crack the wall.

The limit that depends on a date

Total deflection can nearly always be met, and on a long span it is met with camber. The limit that actually decides the member is the other one — the deflection occurring after the brittle finishes are built — and camber does nothing for it whatever, because it is subtracted from both terms of a difference. The same beam passes or fails on the day the partitions went up.

deflection · Incremental deflection The deformation with no limit against it. A 8 m open section carrying 12 kN/m at an eccentricity of 75 mm from its shear centre. The torque is small — 900 Nmm per mm — and the twist is not: 3.40° at mid-span with the ends restrained against warping, against 9.09° if they are not, a factor of 2.67. What that angle does is move the flange tip sideways by 11.9 mm — 82 per cent of the member's own vertical deflection, and 37 per cent of the span/250 that vertical deflection is checked against. The same load on a closed section of the same depth moves it 0.15 mm, 80 times less. No code gives a limit for this quantity, so it is the one movement in the collection that is computed only after somebody has complained about it.

The movement with no limit against it

Every code in the world gives a deflection limit. None gives a twist limit — and a beam loaded off its shear centre twists. On an open section a modest eccentricity moves the flange tip further sideways than four fifths of the sag that does get checked, and nothing anywhere says whether that is acceptable.

deflection · Twist serviceability

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

ServiceabilityStiffnessComposite actionConstruction sequenceCreepLimit statePondingProppingSelf-weightAmplification factorCamberCritical load

All concepts