Axial force — where it appears
Named by 7 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Two walls that agreed to be one
A pair of shear walls with a row of doors between them is the commonest lateral system there is, and it has two readings that differ by a factor of seven. What decides which one applies is a beam 600 mm deep over a 2.4 m opening — and most of the overturning ends up as an axial couple that no bending diagram contains.
The moment the beam left behind
A beam reaction is drawn arriving on a column's centreline. It arrives on a cleat a hundred millimetres out from the face, and the difference is a couple that goes into the column and has to be shared between the lengths above and below it. Nothing about it appears in a frame model whose members meet at nodes.
The columns that lean
A framed tube carries its wind load by bending the spandrel beams between its columns, and it does it badly — the corner columns take nearly six times what the middle ones do. Tilt the columns instead, so the perimeter is triangulated, and the same shear is carried axially. The concentration falls to 1.21 and the tube recovers most of the stiffness the plan said it had.
The ground that hangs on instead of holding up
A pile is driven through fill that has not finished settling. The fill goes down past the shaft, the friction along that length turns round, and the pile is now carrying the soil rather than the other way about. The worst force is not at the head and not at the toe, and nothing at that depth can be seen.
The joint that is not where it was drawn
A truss is drawn as lines through the centroids of its members meeting at points. A fabricated joint is under no obligation to oblige, and when the working lines miss each other the resultant has a moment about the node that has to go somewhere.
The hinge a squeezed section has to work for
Unloaded, a rectangle carries half again its first-yield moment once it is fully plastic and an I-section only a little more, and the I-section gets there almost at once while the rectangle has to bend four times further. Put a column's axial load on them and both rankings move. The rectangle's reserve grows as 1.5(1 + n), to nearly three times its first-yield moment under heavy compression; the I-section's barely moves. And the I-section loses the thing that made it the beam everyone uses: under three-fifths of its squash load it needs more than five times the curvature to develop its plastic moment that it needs as a beam, because the compression has yielded its web before any bending began.
The hinge squeezed while it turns
The leeward column of a frame overturning in an earthquake gains compression as its base hinge rotates. Followed fibre by fibre, with every fibre's plastic strain remembered, the hinge does neither of the things the constant-load curves suggest. It forms early, at the low load it started with, and then rides down the section's plastic moment as the load rises: an I-section whose compression goes from a tenth to six-tenths of its squash load holds 0.86 of its unloaded plastic moment at twice its first-yield curvature and 0.43 at twelve times it. The steel never softens, and the hinge still has a falling branch, set by statics. The relieved column on the other side gains what this one loses, less the curvature of the interaction curve.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Beam-columnDuctilityLoad pathStiffnessCompatibilityDriftEccentricityLateral systemMoment-curvatureMoment distributionOverturningPlastic hinge