Beam-column — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The redistribution nobody chose
A beam designed as simply supported, on connections that are not pins, has end moments the analysis never predicted and a mid-span moment smaller than it was sized for. Usually that is safe. It is never intentional, and there is one direction in which it is not safe at all.
Held by something that goes soft
A guy is a cable, so it has no stiffness of its own — what resists a mast's movement is the guy's geometry changing, and how much of that there is depends on the tension already in it. Wind pushes the mast towards the leeward guy, which is the one losing tension.
The joint that is not where it was drawn
A truss is drawn as lines through the centroids of its members meeting at points. A fabricated joint is under no obligation to oblige, and when the working lines miss each other the resultant has a moment about the node that has to go somewhere.
The joint whose lines may not meet
In a welded tubular truss the noding eccentricity is not a fabrication error. It is fixed by the brace diameter, the brace angle and the gap between the toes, and the gap is chosen for the welder. For a third of ordinary proportions the one gap at which the working lines would meet lies in a band no fabrication rule permits — so the concurrent joint the truss was analysed with is the one joint that cannot be built.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
DetailingEccentricityJoint stiffnessSecondary momentServiceabilityWorking lineAnchorAxial forceBucklingCableClassificationConnection