Thrust line — where it appears
Named by 14 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The shape that carries itself, and the arch that is its reflection
Hang a chain and it takes the one shape that carries its load in pure tension. Turn the shape upside down and it carries the same load in pure compression. That is what an arch is.
The polygon that finds the shape
A hanging string under five loads has no smooth curve in it — it has five vertices and six straight segments, and every slope in it is a running sum divided by one number.
The hinge put in on purpose
An arch with two pinned feet cannot be solved by statics. Add a third hinge at the crown — deliberately weakening it — and the whole structure falls out of one moment equation.
The line that must stay inside
A masonry arch does not stand because its shape is right. It stands because some line of compression can be drawn inside the stonework — any one will do, and there are infinitely many to choose from.
The middle third
A material that cannot be pulled imposes a condition on where the load may land, and the condition is a region rather than a point. For a rectangle it is the famous middle third; for every other section it is a shape nobody quotes, and one ordinary section's is nearly twice as generous as the rule allows.
The member with only one direction
If a body is in equilibrium under forces applied at exactly two points, those forces are equal, opposite and along the line joining the points. It is three conclusions from two equations, it is the shortest real theorem in statics, and nearly everything that follows depends on it without saying so.
Two ways of being wrong
Plastic analysis has two theorems and they point in opposite directions. Any equilibrium field that nowhere exceeds the plastic moment gives a load at or below the collapse load; any mechanism gives one at or above it. Only one of those errors is safe.
The weight that makes it safer
Every load in this collection makes a structure worse. A pinnacle does not. A masonry pier fails when the line of compression leaves the stonework, and adding weight at the top rotates that line back towards the vertical without adding anything the pier cannot carry — so the stone is not being strengthened, it is being aimed.
The strength thrown away on purpose
Masonry, concrete and soil are all analysed as though they had no tensile strength whatever. Each of them has some. The decision to set it to zero is the single most consequential modelling assumption in the subject, it is safe for one kind of check and unsafe for another, and almost nothing that uses it says which.
The load that comes from changing direction
A force that travels in a straight line asks nothing of anything. Bend its path and it asks for a transverse load of F over R along every millimetre of the curve, and that load is real, is nowhere on the load schedule, and is the same statement behind a prestressing tendon, a hoop force, an arch thrust and a web that buckles with nothing applied to it.
The centre that hangs in the air
Cross's analogy turns a closed frame into a short column and reads its redundant moments off as that column's stresses. Nothing in it requires the frame to be straight. Run round a fixed arch, the analogous column's centroid is a point two thirds of the way up the rise, on no part of the arch at all, and the bending stress about it is the arch's horizontal thrust. For a parabola under a uniform load the answer it returns is a diagram of nothing, which is exactly right.
The arch that is only its three hinges
A three-hinged arch's reactions come from three points and nothing else, so a parabola, a circle and a portal frame on the same hinges push on their abutments identically. Move a load across and the point where the reactions cross runs along two straight lines through the crown. That is the arch's influence line, drawn with a straightedge — and friction in the hinges it was built around blurs it.
The polygon that runs out of freedom
A funicular polygon for given loads has exactly three freedoms, so it can be made to pass through three chosen points and no more. Three points is a three-hinged arch, and the drawing solves it. Take the crown hinge away and one freedom is left over. The drawing then offers a whole family of thrust lines and cannot say which one the arch uses — the rib's stiffness decides, and stiffness is not on the paper.
How wrong a drawing is
A pencil line is a band, and two bands cross in a parallelogram that grows as they turn parallel. The accuracy of a graphical construction is therefore a property of the angles it makes, not of the hand that made it — and the worst case is the shallow arch, the structure the method was most used on. Measured properly, the drawing's error there is the size of the builder's, and the check draughtsmen relied on cannot see it.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
FunicularArchEccentricityEquilibriumHorizontal thrustFree bodyGraphic staticsKernBearing pressureDeterminacyForm-findingIndeterminacy