Modal combination — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The gap between two buildings
Two towers side by side in an earthquake need a gap. The obvious answer is the sum of what each can move, and it is wrong — because the two peaks do not happen at the same instant. What decides the answer is the ratio of the two periods, and buildings that sway alike need almost no gap at all.
The twist the combination rule invents
Two modes close together respond together, and the square root of the sum of squares assumes they do not. The error has the sign of the two modal contributions: where they agree, as they do in base shear, the rule comes up short, and where they oppose, as they always do in torque, it comes up long — by a factor of five for a floor whose stiffness sits twenty centimetres off its mass, a torque the building does not have.
Two modes that are really a plane
A building equally stiff in both directions has two translational modes with one period, and they are not a pair of shapes but a whole plane of them. The pair an analysis returns is chosen by asymmetries of a millionth, so any result that depends on the pair — a square-root combination, a comparison with measured modes — inherits a choice the building never made. Damping then decides whether the difference can be seen at all.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Natural periodDampingModal analysisMode shapeOrthogonalityResponse spectrumEccentricityEigenvalueFrequency responseImpactLoad pathModal mass