Load direction — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as polar moment — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
The bracket pushed from the wrong side
A six-bolt bracket checked for a load straight down carries 198.5 kN. Push the same load through the same point at 138 degrees and it carries 135.8 — the direction changes the torque as well as the shear, and the worst direction is one no drawing shows. The capacity of a group whose load can turn is a closed curve, the bolt that governs it changes as the load turns, and what the curve rewards is not a larger polar moment but a smaller distance to the furthest bolt.
The better method flatters the worse layout
The instantaneous centre method finds capacity the elastic method cannot see, and how much it finds depends on the layout it is applied to. On a six-bolt rectangle under a load of unknown direction it is worth 24 per cent; on a ring of six with a smaller polar moment it is worth 14. The two methods agree on which layout to choose and disagree by a factor of five about the margin — and the reason is that a layout the elastic method already likes is one with nothing left to redistribute.
The bolt that was never fitted
A six-bolt bracket found with five bolts in it has lost a sixth of its fasteners and between four and thirty-four per cent of its capacity, depending which one is missing. The share is the smallest of the three things that changed: the centroid moves away from the gap, which lengthens the load's own lever arm, and the polar moment falls by more than the count does. The bolt whose absence costs most is not the bolt that governed the check.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Bolt groupEccentricityElastic methodPolar momentInstantaneous centreBolt bearingBracketDuctilityPlastic redistributionRedundancyRobustnessTorsion