Elastic method — where it appears
Named by 7 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The radius rule, and where it fails
A weld group under an eccentric load is checked at the point furthest from its centroid, on the reasoning that the stress from the twist grows with the radius. That reasoning ignores the direction the two stresses point in, and for one common shape it misses the peak by nine per cent.
The bracket pushed from the wrong side
A six-bolt bracket checked for a load straight down carries 198.5 kN. Push the same load through the same point at 138 degrees and it carries 135.8 — the direction changes the torque as well as the shear, and the worst direction is one no drawing shows. The capacity of a group whose load can turn is a closed curve, the bolt that governs it changes as the load turns, and what the curve rewards is not a larger polar moment but a smaller distance to the furthest bolt.
The better method flatters the worse layout
The instantaneous centre method finds capacity the elastic method cannot see, and how much it finds depends on the layout it is applied to. On a six-bolt rectangle under a load of unknown direction it is worth 24 per cent; on a ring of six with a smaller polar moment it is worth 14. The two methods agree on which layout to choose and disagree by a factor of five about the margin — and the reason is that a layout the elastic method already likes is one with nothing left to redistribute.
The bolt that was never fitted
A six-bolt bracket found with five bolts in it has lost a sixth of its fasteners and between four and thirty-four per cent of its capacity, depending which one is missing. The share is the smallest of the three things that changed: the centroid moves away from the gap, which lengthens the load's own lever arm, and the polar moment falls by more than the count does. The bolt whose absence costs most is not the bolt that governed the check.
The strongest layout leans on one bolt
Search a plate for the six bolt positions that carry most and the answer carries 234 kN — and loses 36 per cent of it if one particular bolt is missing. Move that one bolt fifty millimetres, into the corner the optimum had just left, and the group carries 232 kN and loses 25 per cent whichever bolt goes. Robustness here costs one per cent of strength, and a search for strength alone will never find it.
The bracket with no worst bolt
A bracket that stands out from its column is pulled off the column by the same load that twists it in its plane, so every bolt carries shear and tension at once. Straight down, one corner bolt is worst at both and the check is that bolt's. Tilt the load and the most sheared bolt and the most pulled bolt come apart; the one that fails is whichever of them its interaction reaches first, and at the angle where they swap the group has two worst bolts and no single one.
The worst direction is an eigenvector
A bracket whose load can come from any direction in the plane of its bolts has a capacity that is a closed curve, and once the load also pulls the bracket off its column the curve becomes a surface over direction and distance. Finding its lowest point looks like a search. Under the elliptical interaction of shear and tension it is not: inside each quarter-turn of directions every bolt's demand squared is a quadratic form in the load's direction, so the worst direction is that form's eigenvector, and the bracket's least capacity is a 2 × 2 eigenvalue per bolt. Under the straight line EN 1993-1-8 prints it is a search, because a straight line has no curvature to make an ellipse of — and the hand check that sets the worst shear anywhere against the worst tension anywhere is a tenth too low in the plane and a fifth too low once the bracket is pulled.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Bolt groupEccentricityPolar momentLoad directionBracketInstantaneous centreBolt tensionInteractionPlastic redistributionRedundancyRobustnessTorsion