Shear truss analogy — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The support that is not a point
A reaction is drawn as a single arrow because the equilibrium equations only need its total. Underneath the arrow is a bearing of some width, delivering a pressure over that width, and almost everything a designer would like to know about the region near a support is a consequence of the width the arrow does not have.
The strength with no mechanism in it
A concrete member with no links in it carries shear, and the expression that says how much is three variables raised to fitted powers with a size term in front. There is no free body anywhere in it. What it is fitting is a competition between four things that carry shear across a crack, and only one of them explains why a deeper member is worse at it.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Free bodyLoad pathAggregate interlockBearingBending momentBondCompatibilityContinuityCrack widthCracked sectionDistributed loadDowel action