Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Concept

Section classification — where it appears

Sorting a section by which strength its plates let it reach — the plastic moment, the yield moment, or something below both. It ties a plate slenderness to a permitted method of analysis, so a class 4 section may not use plastic design and a class 1 may redistribute.

Named by 11 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A 8 mm plate, and the width it can be. The elastic critical stress of a plate in compression against its width, with the yield stress drawn across it. Below 370 mm the plate reaches yield before it buckles; above it the plate ripples first, and the fraction of the width still carrying load falls away — at 700 mm only 47 per cent of it is still working.

The plate that ripples, and the width that is left

A wide thin plate in compression buckles at a stress that has nothing to do with the strength of the material. It then goes on carrying load — the middle drops out, and the edges work harder.

stability · Plate buckling Where the class limits come from. The width-to-thickness ratio at which two kinds of plate reaches its own elastic critical stress at the yield stress, for three steel grades. A flange outstand (buckling coefficient 0.43) derives to 18.6, 15.2, 13.3 at 235, 355, 460 N/mm², against quoted limits of 14.0, 11.4, 10.0; A web, in bending (buckling coefficient 4) derives to 56.8, 46.2, 40.6 at 235, 355, 460 N/mm², against quoted limits of 42.0, 34.2, 30.0. The derived number is the larger every time, and by the same factor at every grade — flange outstand 1.33, web, in bending 1.35 — because both the derivation and the quoted limit go as one over the root of the yield stress. A constant ratio is what a fixed knockdown looks like: the derivation is for a perfect plate and the quoted limit is for a rolled one, carrying residual stress and not quite flat.

The section that cannot reach its own strength

A section classification looks like a table of arbitrary numbers. Set a plate's buckling stress equal to the yield stress and the numbers fall out of the plate buckling formula — larger than the quoted ones by a constant factor, at every grade.

materials · Section classification The load did not move; the section did. A lipped channel 200 by 65 mm at 2 mm thick, drawn twice on top of itself: the outline as fabricated, and the part of it still working once the plates have buckled. The web is held on both edges, so it loses its middle; the flanges are held at the web, so an unlipped one would lose its free edge. What survives is not symmetric with what was drawn, so the centroid moves 8.0 mm — and a load applied along the axis it was designed to arrives 8.0 mm off the section that has to carry it. At the 177 kN this section will take, that is 1.42 kNm of bending nobody applied.

What is left after it ripples

A thin plate that buckles locally has not failed. It has stopped taking load in its middle and gone on taking it near its edges, so the member is now made of a different section from the one that was drawn — and the new one has its centroid somewhere else, which turns a concentric load into an eccentric one.

sections · Effective cross-section The same load, two diagrams, both in equilibrium. One span of a pair of 7 m spans under 5 kN/m, drawn twice. The elastic solution puts 31 kNm over the support and 17 in the span. Reducing the support moment by 30% and taking what statics then gives leaves 21 and 21: the section the beam needs falls from 31 kNm to 21, a saving of 30%. Both curves are in equilibrium with the same load — the mid-span ordinate plus half the support moment is the free moment 31 kNm for either — and the second is legitimate for that reason alone. What it costs is 1.0 milliradians of rotation at the support, which the section has to be able to deliver.

The moment that was moved on purpose

The elastic analysis of a continuous beam gives one set of moments. It is not the only set the beam is allowed to have, and taking a smaller one at the support is legal, cheaper, and paid for in a rotation that has to be delivered before the design exists.

internal-forces · Moment redistribution Not where the two loads meet. How much a column loses below the weaker of its two single-mode capacities, against the ratio of its local critical load to its global one. The received claim is that the worst place is where the two coincide; the arithmetic says otherwise. The erosion is largest at a ratio of 0.47 — 23% — sits within a per cent of that for every ratio below about a half, and at exact coincidence is only 2%. What the curve does say is the useful half of the folk claim: once the plates are stocky enough that the local critical load is twice the global one, the interaction is nothing at all, and the section is worth thickening only up to there.

Two ways of buckling at once

A thin-walled column can bow as a whole or ripple in its plates, and each has its own critical load. The received advice is that the worst arrangement is the one where the two are equal. The arithmetic says the opposite — at coincidence the interaction costs two per cent, and the expensive region is where the plates go first.

stability · Mode interaction What is left after the first fibre yields, which is a property of shape. The shape factor — plastic modulus over elastic — for six sections, computed by finding each one's equal-area axis and summing ±f_y over it. The numbers contain no dimension, no stress and no material: a rectangle is exactly 3/2 whatever its size, a diamond exactly 2, a circle 16/3π. The spread is the argument. An I-section keeps only 13 per cent in reserve past first yield, because nearly all its material is already at the extreme fibre and there is nothing further in to recruit; a diamond keeps 100 per cent, because most of its material is near the middle and doing very little elastically. So the section shapes that are best at elastic bending are the ones with the least left afterwards, which is exactly backwards from the way the reserve is usually described.

What is left after the first fibre yields

The elastic section modulus stops at the moment the outermost fibre reaches yield. Nothing else in the section has, so it goes on taking load — and how much more it takes turns out to be a property of the shape alone, with no dimension, no stress and no material anywhere in the answer.

sections · Shape factor The characteristic strength, which nothing was measured at. A lognormal population of strengths with a mean of 30 N/mm² and a coefficient of variation of 0.15. The characteristic value is the 5% fractile — 23.2 N/mm², which is 77% of the mean, and which need not be the strength of any specimen that was tested. Dividing it by 1.50 gives 15.5, and the shaded sliver below that is the fraction of the population that would fail to reach it: 6.4e-6, or one in 155,818. A factor applied to a fractile is not covering the scatter, because the scatter has already been spent getting to the fractile.

The strength no specimen had

A material property is written into a calculation as a number, and a material does not have one. It has a population of strengths with a mean and a spread, and the number used is a low fractile of that population — a value that need not have been measured, that most of the material exceeds, and whose distance below the mean is decided entirely by the scatter.

materials · Characteristic strength The same load, two diagrams, both in equilibrium. One span of a pair of 9 m spans under 30 kN/m, drawn twice. The elastic solution puts 304 kNm over the support and 171 in the span. Reducing the support moment by 30% and taking what statics then gives leaves 213 and 207: the section the beam needs falls from 304 kNm to 213, a saving of 30%. Both curves are in equilibrium with the same load — the mid-span ordinate plus half the support moment is the free moment 304 kNm for either — and the second is legitimate for that reason alone. What it costs is 13.0 milliradians of rotation at the support, which the section has to be able to deliver.

The moment that was shed has to land

Redistribution takes a moment off a beam's support and pays for it with rotation. On a beam that is the whole story. In a frame the support is a column, the shed moment does not vanish, and it arrives at a member whose section was chosen from the diagram it has just left.

internal-forces · Moment redistribution A 10 mm plate, and the width it can be. The elastic critical stress of a plate in compression against its width, with the yield stress drawn across it. Below 462 mm the plate reaches yield before it buckles; above it the plate ripples first, and the fraction of the width still carrying load falls away — at 900 mm only 46 per cent of it is still working.

The coefficient that is not four

A plate's buckling stress carries a coefficient that looks like a constant and is not. It is 4 for an internal element, 0.43 for an outstand and 23.9 for a panel in shear — and the width a 10 mm plate may be runs from 152 mm to 1,130 across that range.

stability · Plate buckling The stub column a bearing stiffener makes, in plan. A plan through the girder at the bearing. The 8 mm web runs across; the pair of 100 × 12 stiffeners stands off it; and the shaded strip of web either side — 15ε t_w, or 98 mm each way — is the width that buckles with the stiffeners rather than independently of them. Together they are an area of 3962 mm² with a second moment of 9.01·10⁶ mm⁴ about the web's centreline, a radius of gyration of 48 mm over a buckling length of 900 mm — 0.75 of the depth, because the flanges hold the ends. That is a slenderness of 0.25, at which the column curve returns 0.98: the stub column reaches 98 per cent of its squash load, and the section's own strength is very nearly the whole answer.

A column nine hundred millimetres long

The patch-load check asks how much of a web a flange can spread a wheel over, and answers in a plate-buckling reduction that throws seven tenths of it away. A pair of stiffeners does not improve that answer. It replaces the question with a different one, from a different family, with a different failure in it.

stability · Patch loading The coefficient a web gets depends on where its neutral axis is. The plate buckling coefficient for an internal element against ψ = σ₂/σ₁, the ratio of the stresses at the two edges of the panel. Uniform compression is ψ = 1 and k = 4; a gradient running from compression to zero is ψ = 0 and k = 7.81; pure bending is ψ = −1 and k = 23.92, six times the value a column's flange gets. The 1800 × 12 mm web drawn here starts at ψ = −1.000 and k = 23.92 and ends at ψ = −0.910 and k = 21.63, because losing width from the compressed half drops the neutral axis and deepens the compression zone. The curve is steepest exactly where a bending web sits, so a small movement of the neutral axis costs 2.29 of coefficient.

Classified by a gradient it does not have

A web in bending is the one plate whose buckling coefficient cannot be looked up. It depends on the stress gradient, the gradient depends on where the neutral axis is, and the neutral axis depends on how much of the web the coefficient has just taken away — so the answer is a fixed point, and the calculation everyone does is its first term.

stability · Plate buckling

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Effective widthDuctilityPlate bucklingSlendernessPost-bucklingFree bodyLocal bucklingPlastic hingeRotation capacitySquash loadBuckling coefficientCold-formed

All concepts