Loss factor — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The damper is only as good as its brace
A viscous damper added to a frame is held by a brace, and the brace is a spring in series with it. That pair has a ceiling: the most damping it can add is (√(1+κ) − 1)/2, κ being the brace's stiffness over the frame's, reached at one damper size and lost on either side of it. A brace as stiff as the frame allows 20.7%; a quarter as stiff, 5.9%. A damper larger than the best one is not better — it strokes less, locks, and turns the brace into a strut that moves the resonance instead of flattening it.
The damper sized for the earthquake
A fluid damper whose force goes as its velocity to the power 0.3 is chosen because it caps the force a large earthquake can push through its brace. The same exponent makes its effective size depend on how far it strokes. Sized to its brace's best at the earthquake's amplitude, it adds 20.7% of critical damping there, 5.4% at three-tenths of it, and nothing at all at a tenth — where the brace has locked, the building is stiffer, and the motion its occupants feel meets a resonance that is as sharp as an undamped frame's. Giving half the brace to a linear damper keeps 9.3% under the wind for 1.2 points at the earthquake.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
BraceDampingNatural periodResonanceViscous damperEigenvalueNon-linear responseSeries stiffnessStiffnessWind load