Floor vibration — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The floor that is strong and unusable
A floor can satisfy every strength check, deflect less than the limit, and still be rejected by the people who work on it — because somebody walking across it at two steps a second happens to be exciting it at exactly the rate it likes to move.
Stiffer than the model said
Measured natural frequencies of finished buildings come out between ten and sixty per cent above the values computed for them, consistently and in one direction only. Nothing on the list of reasons is a modelling error: every one is a real source of stiffness deliberately left out — and leaving stiffness out is conservative for deflection and unconservative for vibration.
The crowd that is also the structure
A crowd jumping to music loads a grandstand with harmonics several times those of walking, and nothing about their size is measured: they follow from a pulse that has to average one body weight. But the people who jump arrive with the people who sit, and the seated crowd is mass, stiffness and damping bolted to the stand. It lowers the worst case by a factor of five and makes the most common jumping rates worse.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
DampingNatural frequencyServiceabilityFootfallModal massResonanceCalibrationComposite actionCrowd loadingDeflectionJoint stiffnessMode shape