Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Generator

The deflection at x = 3, by virtual work

Rendered here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it — which is the same list as the blast radius of changing it.
The deflection at x = 3, by virtual work. Three diagrams: the moment from the real load, the moment from a unit load placed where the answer is wanted, and their product. The area under the third, divided by EI, is the deflection — 197.50 here. No standard case was consulted, so the method works for any load pattern at all.

The deflection at x = 3, by virtual work. Three diagrams: the moment from the real load, the moment from a unit load placed where the answer is wanted, and their product. The area under the third, divided by EI, is the deflection — 197.50 here. No standard case was consulted, so the method works for any load pattern at all.

12 essays call unit-load. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

The deflection at x = 4, by virtual work. Three diagrams: the moment from the real load, the moment from a unit load placed where the answer is wanted, and their product. The area under the third, divided by EI, is the deflection — 213.33 here. No standard case was consulted, so the method works for any load pattern at all. Deflection

One deflection, without solving everything

To find how far one point of a structure moves, put an imaginary force of one unit there, multiply two moment diagrams together, and integrate. The answer arrives without ever solving for the deflected shape.

 Maxwell's reciprocal theorem. A load at one point and the deflection it causes at another, against the same load moved to the second point and the deflection read at the first. Both integrals return 93.3335, and neither calculation was told about the other. The two deflected shapes are entirely different; the two readings are identical. Deflection

The theorem that swaps the question round

Push here and measure there; push there and measure here. The two readings are identical, for every elastic structure, whatever its shape — and that fact turns an influence line into something a model can be asked for directly.

 3 continuous spans against 3 simple ones. The bending moment in a continuous beam whose support 1 has settled by 0.01. Three curves: the moment the load causes, the moment the settlement causes on its own — dashed, peaking at 73.5, and in equilibrium with no applied load at all — and their sum, which is what the beam carries, peaking at 73.5 against 24.5 without the settlement. The settlement field is proportional to EI: a stiffer beam is punished harder for the same movement, which is the opposite of every intuition load-carrying gives. Deflection

The support that moved

A redundant structure knows things statics cannot see. Settle one support by ten millimetres and a complete set of bending moments appears — in equilibrium with no load at all, and larger for a stiffer beam.

 The answer arrives in instalments. The hogging moment at support 1 of a three-span beam, cycle by cycle. It starts at the fixed-end moment of 53.3 kNm — the value with every joint clamped — and settles at 64.0 kNm against an exact 64.0. The error falls by about a factor of four per cycle: 14.00, 3.50, 1.95, 0.59 kNm after one, two, three and four. Two cycles is an engineering answer and nobody had to invert anything. Deflection

Solved by passing it around

An indeterminate structure needs simultaneous equations, and for thirty years engineers solved them without writing any down. Clamp every joint, release one, share out what is left over, pass half of it along, and repeat — and the answer walks in, three figures correct after four cycles.

 The area is the rotation, and its first moment is the movement. A 6 m cantilever under a tip load of 10, with the M/EI diagram beneath it. The shaded area is 180.00, which by the first theorem is the change of slope along the whole member. Its centroid is at 2.000 m, and the first moment about the tip is 720.00 — which by the second theorem is the deviation from the tangent, and for a cantilever that tangent is horizontal, so it is the deflection itself. Integrating the curvature twice instead gives 720.00. Deflection

The area of a diagram is a rotation

A deflection is the double integral of a bending moment, and the two constants of integration are the whole difficulty. Mohr's theorems replace them with two pictures — an area, and where that area's centre of gravity sits.

 A derivative taken with a ruler, and the step that makes it worst. Castigliano's theorem says the deflection is ∂U/∂P, and the derivative here is taken numerically — two solves at ±dQ and a central difference. Against the unit-load answer of 1.720635e-2 it agrees to 1.6e-13, which for a linear structure it must: ∂N/∂P is exactly the force a unit load produces, so the two expressions are the same sum written twice. The error against step size is the classic pair of straight lines — truncation falling as the step shrinks, round-off rising as the difference of two nearly equal energies loses its digits — meeting near dQ = 1.2e+1. For a linear structure the truncation term is exactly zero, so what is drawn here is round-off alone. Deflection

The deflection that is a derivative

A structure's strain energy is one number. Differentiate it with respect to a load and out comes the displacement under that load — and the trick that makes it a method rather than an identity is that the load does not have to be there.

 The beam is stiffer than its cracked section and softer than its gross one. Moment against mid-span deflection for a 300 × 550 mm beam spanning 8.0 m, with the two bounds it lies between. The uncracked line is what the gross transformed section gives; the cracked line is what the section at a crack gives; and the curve between them is the member, because between the cracks the concrete is still carrying tension and the average curvature is not either section's. At the service load the deflection is 23.2 mm — span over 345 — against 8.3 uncracked and 25.2 fully cracked, a factor of 3.03 between the bounds. The interpolation ζ = 1 − β(M_cr/M)² sits it 88 per cent of the way across, and β falls from one to a half under sustained or repeated load because the bond that does the dragging deteriorates. Deflection

Stiffer than its cracked section says

At a crack the concrete below the neutral axis has gone and the steel carries the tension alone. Between the cracks it has not gone — bond drags it back into tension, the steel strain drops, and the curvature averaged over a length of beam is neither section's.

 Half the beam does nearly all of the deflecting. The virtual-work integrand M·m/EI along the member, normalised to its own peak, with the running share of the answer beside it. The integrand is a density: it says how much of the deflection each millimetre of the beam produced. For this case the half nearest the root supplies 87.5 per cent of it, and the rest of the member supplies the remainder. Stiffening the busy 50 per cent by 1.5 times takes the deflection down by 29.2 per cent; the same material spent on the quiet end takes it down by 4.2 — a factor of 7.0 for the same steel. The map of what is contributing is not the map of where the moment is largest, and the second is the one that gets drawn. Deflection

Where a deflection comes from

The unit-load method gives a deflection as an integral, and this collection has treated that integral as a number to evaluate. It is not a number. It is a density, and it says which millimetres of the member produced the answer — which is not the same map as where the moment is largest.

 Maxwell's reciprocal theorem. A load at one point and the deflection it causes at another, against the same load moved to the second point and the deflection read at the first. Both integrals return 307.5006, and neither calculation was told about the other. The two deflected shapes are entirely different; the two readings are identical. Deflection

An influence line is a deflected shape

Finding where a load has to stand to be worst means solving the structure once for every position it could stand in. Reciprocity says the answer is a single deflected shape — release the quantity being asked about, move it by a unit, and the shape the structure takes is the influence line.

 Every member's share of the movement, and they are not the members expected. A Pratt truss of eight panels at a depth of 1, carrying 15 kN at each top node, with the movement of the bottom chord at mid-span attributed member by member. The unit-load sum δ = ΣF·f·L/EA gives 2019.41 at EA = 1: 49.4% from six top chords, 30.8% from eight bottom chords, 16.8% from eight diagonals, 3.0% from seven verticals. The single worst member is a top chord at mid-span at 11.9% of the whole. Each member is drawn at the width of its own share. The same deflection from a stiffness solution that shares none of this arithmetic is 2019.41, a relative residual of 1.4e-14. Deflection

The member that is not worth stiffening

A truss's deflection is a sum of one term per member, and a term is zero whenever either force in its product is. A vertical carrying the whole of a panel load can contribute nothing at all to the movement — which a total can never show and a per-member sum shows nothing else.

 A unit load carried by the prop taken away. A beam fixed at its left end and propped at its right, under 4 kN/m over 8 m, asked how far it moves at 4 m. The real moment is the propped cantilever's own, with -32.0 kNm at the wall. The unit load is carried by the prop taken away, whose moment diagram peaks at 4.00. Their product has 98.92 of area on one side and -13.33 on the other, and the net, divided by EI, is 85.33 — the propped cantilever's closed-form deflection, 85.33, which no part of this calculation was given. Deflection

Any structure will carry the unit load

Virtual work has two readings and each is free exactly where the other is bound. A unit load needs only something to stand on in equilibrium, so the deflection of a beam statics cannot solve comes out of a cantilever statics can. A virtual displacement needs only to fit together, so a reaction comes out of pushing a mechanism — and on a redundant beam the unknown cancels out of the equation and nothing is found at all.

 Three routes to one deflection, and the one that is wrong. Two 2500 mm bars of 250 MPa proof stress meeting at a loaded apex, the drop of the apex against the load. The line is geometry: each bar's extension from its own stress, divided by the sine of its slope. The dots are the derivative of the total complementary energy with respect to the load, and lie on it. The dashed line is the derivative of the strain energy — Castigliano's theorem applied to a material that is not linear — which leaves the truth by ten per cent at 99 kN and at 170 kN gives 308 mm for a deflection of 46.0. Deflection

The other area under the curve

Castigliano's theorem says a deflection is the derivative of the strain energy with respect to the load, and it is true only while the material is linear. Past that, the right energy is the area on the other side of the stress–strain curve. On two aluminium bars at their proof stress the strain energy gives a deflection four times too large, and on a redundant truss minimising it picks a set of forces in perfect equilibrium that no deformed shape can produce.

The library, page 6 of 7 — where unit-load sits