Generator

3% of the mass, hung on a spring, against the peak it removes

Rendered here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it — which is the same list as the blast radius of changing it.

3% of the mass, hung on a spring, against the peak it removes. The magnification of a structure with 1.0% damping, with and without a tuned mass damper of 3.0% of its mass, tuned to 0.9709 of its frequency with 10.5% damping of its own. The bare peak is 50; with the absorber the single peak becomes two of 7.34, a reduction to 15% — a factor of 6.8. The marked points at frequency ratios 0.923 and 1.044 are the fixed points: the response there is the same whatever damping the absorber is given, which is what makes the optimum a question with an answer. The absorber's own stroke at the worse of the two peaks is 29.57 times the structure's static deflection, and that stroke is what decides whether it fits.

3% of the mass, hung on a spring, against the peak it removes. The magnification of a structure with 1.0% damping, with and without a tuned mass damper of 3.0% of its mass, tuned to 0.9709 of its frequency with 10.5% damping of its own. The bare peak is 50; with the absorber the single peak becomes two of 7.34, a reduction to 15% — a factor of 6.8. The marked points at frequency ratios 0.923 and 1.044 are the fixed points: the response there is the same whatever damping the absorber is given, which is what makes the optimum a question with an answer. The absorber's own stroke at the worse of the two peaks is 29.57 times the structure's static deflection, and that stroke is what decides whether it fits.

6 essays call tuned-mass. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

The damping a crowd leaves behind, and the number of people that uses it up. Total damping ratio against pedestrians, for a structure with 0.60% of its own and a modal mass of 120 tonnes at 0.5 Hz. Each person walking laterally puts a force in phase with the deck's velocity into it — about 300 N·s/m per person — so the crowd subtracts from the damping, and at 30.16 people what is left is nothing. Below the threshold a disturbance dies away. Above it, the structure feeds itself and the motion grows out of nothing at all — which is what makes this a different mechanism from resonance rather than a severe case of it.

The bridge that was pushed by its own sway

A crowd walking on a bridge that moves sideways adjusts its footing to stay balanced, and the adjustment pushes the bridge the way it is already going. The crowd is a damper with the sign reversed, and past a certain number of people the total damping is negative.

3% of the mass, hung on a spring, against the peak it removes. The magnification of a structure with 1.0% damping, with and without a tuned mass damper of 3.0% of its mass, tuned to 0.9709 of its frequency with 10.5% damping of its own. The bare peak is 50; with the absorber the single peak becomes two of 7.34, a reduction to 15% — a factor of 6.8. The marked points at frequency ratios 0.923 and 1.044 are the fixed points: the response there is the same whatever damping the absorber is given, which is what makes the optimum a question with an answer. The absorber's own stroke at the worse of the two peaks is 29.57 times the structure's static deflection, and that stroke is what decides whether it fits.

The mass that helps by being late

Hang three per cent of a building's mass from a spring in its roof, tune the spring so the mass arrives a quarter-cycle behind the motion, and the peak response falls by a factor of seven. Nothing was strengthened and nothing was stiffened.

How much of a force a mount lets through, at three damping ratios. The force transmitted to the support divided by the force applied, against the ratio of the forcing frequency to the structure's own, at 2%, 5%, 20% of critical damping. Every curve passes through exactly 1 at a frequency ratio of root two, whatever the damping: below that ratio a mount amplifies what it was installed to isolate, and above it more damping lets more through.

The machine that shakes the building

Put a machine on springs to keep its vibration out of the floor, and below a frequency ratio of root two the springs make things worse. Every transmissibility curve ever drawn passes through exactly one at that ratio, whatever the damping — so a soft mount either works well or fails badly, with nothing in between.

The building is a filter with one very sharp tooth. What a component mounted on the roof of a eight-storey building feels, divided by what the same component would have felt on the ground. A rigid item sees the floor's peak acceleration rather than the ground's, which is already 2.29 times as much. An item whose own period matches the building's sees 6.1 times as much, at 0.94 s — a resonance inside a resonance, and the two amplifications multiply rather than add. Far above the building's period the ratio falls back toward one, because a component much softer than its support simply follows the ground. The shape of this curve is a property of the building and not of the earthquake, which is why equipment is qualified against a floor spectrum rather than a ground one.

The spectrum a floor hands on

Most of what breaks in an earthquake is not the structure. It is a transformer, a chiller, a rack, a ceiling, a pipe — and every one of them is bolted to a floor rather than to the ground. The motion it feels has already been through a filter with one very sharp tooth in it.

One actuator, a tower and a floor. The peak amplification of a mode with 1 per cent damping under velocity feedback of gain 0.10, against the mode's frequency on a logarithmic scale, for control loops whose delay is 10, 25, 50 milliseconds. The dotted line is the mode without control, 50. With 10 ms: 4.6 at 0.2 Hz, 4.5 at 2 Hz and 5.0 at 8 Hz; with 25 ms: 4.6 at 0.2 Hz, 4.6 at 2 Hz and 19.0 at 8 Hz, unstable from 9.8 Hz; with 50 ms: 4.5 at 0.2 Hz, 5.3 at 2 Hz and unstable at 8 Hz, unstable from 4.9 Hz. A delay is a fixed time and a period is not, so the same loop that damps a tall building's sway is too late for a floor.

The actuator that arrives late

A tuned mass damps a structure because its force arrives a quarter of a cycle behind the motion. Replace the mass with an actuator told to push against the structure's velocity, and the same quarter-cycle is fatal: the push that was damping becomes stiffness, the stiffness becomes a source of energy, and a gain that would have cut the response tenfold makes the structure vibrate by itself. The delay is a few hundredths of a second, which is nothing to a tower and everything to a floor.

$What the actuator pushes against decides its limit. The largest feedback gain, as the damping it would add to the bare mode, at which the loop stays stable, against the delay as a fraction of the period, on a logarithmic scale, for a mode of 1.00 per cent damping carrying a tuned mass of 2.00 per cent of its modal mass at Den Hartog's tuning. Pushing against the ground, fed by the structure's velocity: 2.41 at a delay of 0.05, 0.25 at 0.2. Pushing against the tuned mass, fed by the same velocity: 0.0156 at almost no delay, rising to 0.091 at a quarter of a period. Pushing against the tuned mass, fed by the velocity across it: unlimited with no delay, 0.048 at 0.05, 0.0073 at 0.2.$ Dynamics

The actuator that pushes against the mass

An actuator that damps a structure by feeding back its velocity has to push against something. Against the ground, it is stable up to large gains until a delay of a quarter period removes its damping. Against a tuned mass — the arrangement meant to keep a passive damper underneath — the same feedback goes unstable at a gain of a per cent and a half with no delay at all, makes the structure worse than the passive mass at every gain below that, and drives the mass three or four times as far. What limits it is not when it acts but what it pushes against.

The library, page 6 of 7 — where tuned-mass sits