Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Concept

Rotational stiffness — where it appears

The moment required to rotate a joint or a support through one radian, which decides how much of a member's end moment the connection actually carries. It is a continuous quantity, so the pinned and rigid idealisations are the two ends of a scale rather than a choice of two.

Named by 11 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A couple applied to the core, and two columns to make it. A 20-storey core with one outrigger at 59% of its height. The arm is stiff in bending and the perimeter columns are stiff in tension and compression, so between them they resist the core's rotation at that level — a couple of 35283 kNm here, carried as a 294 kN pair in the columns at 120 m centres. The compatibility is one equation: the core's rotation at that level, less what the couple takes back out of it, equals the rotation the arm and its columns allow. The top drift falls from 360 mm to 74, which is 80% of it, and the base moment from 73500 to 38217 kNm. The deflected shape is drawn hugely exaggerated: the real top drift is about one five-hundredth of the height.

The arm that makes the columns work

The perimeter columns of a tall building are already there, already carrying gravity, and already the furthest thing from the centre. They take almost none of the overturning, because a floor slab transmits shear and not moment — and one storey-deep arm at the right height changes that by nearly a half.

structures · Outrigger A base plate, and when the bolts start working. A 550 × 450 mm plate carrying 900 kN and 140 kN·m, so the resultant sits 155.56 mm from the centre against a kern of 91.67 mm. The plate is in partial contact: bearing over 358.33 mm at a peak of 11.16 N/mm², with the holding-down bolts carrying 0 kN. The plate lifts at 82.5 kN·m and crushes at 192.95 kN·m, and the bolts are not needed until 247.5 kN·m.

The pinned base that is not pinned

A column base drawn as a pin is a plate bearing on grout, and a plate in contact over its whole length resists rotation whether anybody wanted it to or not. The stiffness it delivers depends on the axial load, so the assumption is one a frame can leave and re-enter as its loads change.

stability · Sway stability What a torsional brace buys, and the stiffness it takes. The critical moment of an 8 m beam against the stiffness of a single rotational restraint at midspan — a cross-frame or a stiffened connection to a secondary beam, resisting the twist rather than the sideways movement. It climbs from an unbraced 143 kNm to the same two-half-wave plateau of 447 a lateral brace reaches, and gets to 99% of it at 253 kNm/rad. Nothing in the calculation refers to a height, which is the difference that matters: a torsional brace cannot be put on the wrong flange because it is not attached to a flange in the sense the lateral one is.

Twice the moment, four times the brace

A lateral brace has to be on the right flange and its demand is very nearly linear in the load. A torsional brace has no flange to be wrong about, and its demand is exactly quadratic — so the restraint that is indifferent to where it is attached is the one that gets expensive fastest.

stability · Beam bracing Where the span moment and the support moment cross. Span moment and support moment against the joint's stiffness, for a 6 m beam under 30 kN/m. They move in opposite directions because they add to a constant — the simple-span 135 kN·m is fixed by statics and the joint only decides how it is split. They cross at 68 kN·m, where the joint is delivering 75 per cent of the fixed-end moment, and neither the crossing nor the fraction depends on the beam, the span or the load: it is the point where f·wL²/12 equals wL²/8 − f·wL²/12, which is f = 0.75 for every beam there has ever been.

The joint that was chosen

A joint's stiffness decides how a beam's moment divides between its span and its supports, and the two add to a constant. So there is a stiffness at which they are equal, the beam is sized by the smaller of two numbers rather than the larger of one, and the design moment is half what a simple connection leaves behind.

connections · Joint classification Four things a far end can be doing, and what each is worth. The rotational stiffness of a member at one end, for four conditions at the other, each drawn as the shape the member takes when the near end is rotated through one unit. They are the same expression evaluated four times — M = (2EI/L)(2θ_a + θ_b) — and the only thing that changes is what the far end is known to be doing. A held far end gives 4EI/L and carries over a half; a free one gives 3EI/L and carries over nothing; a far end rotating equally and oppositely gives 2EI/L and carries over minus one, which is what a symmetric structure does to a member crossing its axis; and a far end rotating equally and in the same sense gives 6EI/L and carries over one. None of the four is an approximation. Each removes a freedom that was going to be discovered by iteration.

Told what the far end is doing

Moment distribution discovers, cycle by cycle, that the pinned end of a beam carries no moment — a fact known before any arithmetic started. Telling it instead changes one stiffness from 4EI/L to 3EI/L and the work from thirty numbers to eight, for the identical answer. Cutting the beam on its own axis of symmetry gets it in two.

deflection · Moment distribution Every number in the table is a rotation, and none of them is a moment. The rotation contributions of a three-span beam of 8, 10, 8 m under 24 kN/m, sweep by sweep. There are six of them, one per member end, and not one is a bending moment: the moment is assembled at the end from M = FEM + 2m′ + m′ of the far end, and until that is done the table holds quantities that mean nothing on their own. That is the trade. A moment distribution stopped after two cycles hands over moments that are wrong by a known amount and can be used; this table stopped after two sweeps hands over nothing that can be read at all — and it gets there in four sweeps against Cross's own count on the same beam, writing six numbers a sweep rather than one per distributed member end plus a carry-over.

The table that cannot be read halfway

Kani's method converges at exactly the rate moment distribution does, sweep for sweep and digit for digit, because it is the same iteration. What it changes is what is written in the boxes — rotations rather than moments — and that buys a shorter table that repairs its own mistakes and cannot be stopped early.

deflection · Moment distribution The joint yields first and the span takes the rest. The end and span moments of a beam of span 9 m and flexural rigidity 61,700 kN·m², with a plastic moment of 522 kN·m, on joints of rotational stiffness 41,133 kN·m/rad, 6.00 EI/L, and resistance 261 kN·m, as a uniform load rises to collapse. While elastic the joints carry 0.75 of the fixed-end moment. The joints reach their resistance first, at 51.6 kN/m, and from there every further increment of load goes to the span, which reaches 522 kN·m at 77.3 kN/m. The collapse load is 8(Mp + Mj)/L² = 77.3 kN/m, between the 51.6 at which the beam would collapse on pins and the 103.1 it would reach on rigid full-strength ends, and it contains the joint's strength and not its stiffness.

The joint that has to keep turning

A beam on partial-strength joints collapses at 8(Mp + Mj)/L² however stiff the joints are. Stiffness decides only which yields first, and a joint that yields first has to go on rotating at full moment until the span catches up. A weak joint on a stiff connection has the most turning to do — more than a rigid full-strength one.

connections · Joint classification What the frame notices. An 8 m by 4 m portal whose columns stand on bases of every rotational stiffness, in units of the column's EI/L on a logarithmic scale: solid, the portal's sway under a load at the knee as a multiple of the fixed-based portal's; dashed, the columns' effective length factor in sway (fixed bases 1.13, pinned 2.26). Bolts sleeved 300 mm, 5.3 EI/L: 1.45 times the fixed portal's drift, an effective length factor of 1.30 and 75 per cent of its buckling load; as detailed, 9.1 EI/L: 1.28 times the fixed portal's drift, an effective length factor of 1.23 and 83 per cent of its buckling load; rigid by EN 1993-1-8, 30.0 EI/L: 1.09 times the fixed portal's drift, an effective length factor of 1.16 and 94 per cent of its buckling load.

The fixed base the bolts decide

A column base drawn as fixed is a spring, and the component method says what it is made of: the grout squeezed under the flange, the plate bending under the bolt row, and the anchor bolts stretching over their free length. For a 500 mm plate on two M24 bolts the bolts are three fifths of its flexibility, so the base comes out at nine times the column's EI/L — under a third of what EN 1993-1-8 calls rigid — and no thickness of plate can lift it above fifteen. Leave the bolts free in sleeves for erection tolerance and it falls to five. The frame on it drifts 28 per cent more than a fixed-based one and buckles at 83 per cent of the load.

connections · Base plate How stiff an abutment has to be to count as fixed. The shortening moments in a 60 m parabolic concrete rib at a 6 m rise (EI 420,000 kN·m²) under 60 kN/m as shares of the fixed rib's, against the rotational stiffness of each springing as a multiple of EI/L on a logarithmic scale: at the springings (solid, −112 kN·m when fixed) and the crown (dashed, 58 kN·m fixed, 29 two-hinged). The springing moment is half the fixed value at kθ = 11.3 EI/L and nine tenths at 102 EI/L; at EI/L itself it is 8 per cent. The crown moment never falls below the two-hinged rib's 51 per cent of the fixed value.

The abutment that spreads before it turns

A fixed arch is fixed only if its abutments hold still, and they have two ways not to. Turning releases the springing moment, but slowly: an abutment has to be a hundred times the rib's EI/L to hold nine tenths of it, and a footing on stiff clay under a slender concrete rib already is. Spreading does the opposite. The rib's own shortening is worth 13.6 mm of spread, so an abutment that gives 7 mm a side under the thrust doubles every secondary moment in the arch — and a footing on dense sand gives 8.

deflection · Rib shortening A bigger top column attracts more moment, and only the joint stops it. The top storey of the edge column of a braced six-storey frame — 4 m storeys, a 254 UC 89 below the splice and a 203 UC 60 above — carrying a 9 m beam at every floor on partial-strength joints of 261 kN·m, with each of seven columns that might be chosen for it: the moment its floor's edge joint delivers at the design load of 60 kN/m (dark) and at the beams' collapse load (light), against what the column can carry at its top end, its plastic moment reduced for the axial force (line). 203×203 UC 46: 148 and 195 against 167; 203×203 UC 60: 171 and 225 against 230; 203×203 UC 71: 189 and 247 against 283; 203×203 UC 86: 205 and 261 against 347; 254×254 UC 73: 218 and 261 against 352; 254×254 UC 89: 232 and 261 against 435; 254×254 UC 107: 243 and 261 against 527. A stiffer column attracts more of the joint's moment until the joint's 261 kN·m caps it; the lightest column that carries what it attracts at collapse is the 203 × 203 UC 60.

The column on the other side of the joint

A partial-strength joint is sold as a fuse: it caps the moment a beam can put into its support at the joint's own resistance. At an interior column that is true. At the edge of a frame the column is not a support that stays still; it is a spring in series with the joint, so the joint delivers less than its resistance in service and almost exactly what a rigid joint would. The column then carries three times the moment the simple-construction rule gave it, and at the top storey, where it stands alone and is lightest, it is weaker than the joint it was meant to be protected by.

connections · Joint classification A secondary holds more than it twists once its connection passes a few tens of kilonewton-metres per radian. The mid-span twist of the 8 m primary beam of 12 kN/m at 75 mm off its shear centre, with a 6 m 356 × 171 × 51 UB framing in at mid-span whose 60 kN reaction acts 60 mm off the shear centre, against the rotational stiffness of the secondary's connection on a logarithmic scale, in series with the secondary's own 3EI/L of 14,453 kN·m/rad. Dashed, the 6.25° with no secondary. On the deck's side the secondary is worse than none below 33 kN·m/rad and better above it: 9.12° at 10, 3.28 at 100, 0.47 at 1,000. On the far side its torque opposes the deck's (0.89° at 10); as a pair, the torques cancel (1.05° at 100). EN 1993-1-8 calls this secondary's connection nominally pinned below 2,409 kN·m/rad (dotted).

The secondary beam that twists what it holds

A secondary beam framing into a twisting primary at mid-span is the best restraint a primary can have — concentrated exactly where the twist is. It is also a load: its reaction arrives on the primary's web, off the shear centre, as a torque at exactly the same place. Which wins is decided by the connection, and the threshold is low: a fin plate stiffer than about 33 kN·m per radian, a seventieth of what still counts as a pin, makes the secondary hold far more than it twists. The bolts' free play is another matter, because the torque acts from the first millimetre and the restraint only once the play is taken up.

deflection · Twist serviceability

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

ContinuityJoint classificationSemi-rigidDesign momentJoint stiffnessMoment distributionBase plateCarry-overConnection designConvergenceDegrees of freedomDistribution factor

All concepts