Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Concept

Fully stressed design — where it appears

Proportioning every member so that it reaches its permitted stress exactly, which is the natural objective when strength is the only constraint. It is not the minimum-weight design once buckling is included, because a strut's area depends on its length as well as on its force.

Named by 6 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Two curves climbing together, and the one that catches up first. A 6 m member tapering from 200 to 600 mm, with the moment it carries and the moment it can carry drawn on the same scale below it. The demand rises linearly and the capacity as the square of the depth, so the gap between them closes and then opens again. It is narrowest at 3.00 m from the free end, where the member is 400 mm deep and 79% used, against 70% at the root where the moment is largest.

The section that changes along the span

A prismatic beam is checked where the moment is largest, and everyone knows where that is. A tapered one is not, because the capacity is moving too — and for a cantilever with a load at its tip the governing station is exactly where the depth has doubled, with no length, no load and no material in the answer.

sections · Tapered member The split is where buckling puts it. A branching column carrying 400 kN to two points 3.0 m apart, over 9.0 m. Every member is drawn at the thickness it needs: the area is the larger of N/σ and what Euler asks of a strut of that length, and 3 of 3 members here are sized by buckling rather than by strength. The split sits at 57% of the height, which is where the total volume is least — 51% less than the fan of straight struts that carries the same load with the same stresses.

The tree that strength does not ask for

A branching column carries a roof on many points and reaches the ground on one. Size every member by its stress and the optimum tree turns out to have no trunk at all — the best answer is a fan of straight struts from the base. Put buckling in and the trunk appears, at 57 per cent of the height.

structures · Branching structure The worst section of a haunched rafter is inside the haunch. Utilisation along a 15.3 m portal rafter carrying 8 kN/m, with an eaves moment of 500 kNm and an apex moment of 150, haunched over 3 m from 906 mm deep down to the rafter's own 453. The moment is largest at the eaves and the depth is largest there too, so the eaves is at 0.42; the apex is at 0.31. The peak is 0.46 at 2.98 m — the haunch tip, where the section has just become the bare rafter and the moment is still 226 kNm. The dashed curve is the same rafter with no haunch, which reaches 1.02 and does not pass.

The section that governs is inside the haunch

A tapered cantilever has its worst section somewhere along it because the moment grows linearly and the modulus quadratically. A haunched rafter has the same competition with a step in it, and the step is where the check lands — at neither end of the member, at a station no formula names.

sections · Tapered member One volume of steel, divided three ways. A Pratt truss of eight panels at a depth of 1, carrying 10 kN at each top joint, drawn three times with every member as wide as its area, the total volume the same in each. With equal areas the mid-span deflection is 43503; fully stressed, with area in proportion to force, 32702; with area in proportion to the square root of the product of each member's real and virtual forces — the division that makes mid-span as stiff as this steel can make it — 31318. The fully stressed truss is 4 per cent short of the stiffest; the equal-area truss is 39 per cent short. No member is allowed less than 10 per cent of the equal area; the deflections are in units of load × length / (E × volume).

The truss that is stiff by accident

Give a truss a fixed volume of steel and ask how to divide it among the members. Sized for strength — every member at the same stress — its mid-span deflection comes within four per cent of the stiffest that steel can make, although stiffness was never asked about. The reason is an inequality, and the same inequality says where the accident stops: at the quarter point the strength design is sixty-nine per cent short of the best.

deflection · Truss deflection The strength design, and the least steel that is stiffer. A Pratt truss of eight panels at a depth of 1, carrying 10 kN at each top joint, each member drawn as wide as its section from a catalogue whose sections step by 25 per cent in area, the smallest 10 per cent of the largest member's need. Above, every member at the smallest section that carries its force. Below, the least steel that makes mid-span 1.50 times as stiff with every member still strong enough — the discrete optimum — with the 24 members it made larger drawn in the second colour: six of six top chord members, eight of eight bottom chord members, six of eight diagonals, four of seven verticals. The optimum uses 44 per cent more steel than the strength design, and it puts it where a member's real and virtual forces are both large; members either force leaves small are not touched.

The calculus answer, rounded, is the worst one

A real truss is built from a catalogue, and every member is rounded up to the next section. That rounding costs its stiffness almost nothing: the few per cent that separate the strength design from the stiffest survive it. What does cost is the next step. When a deflection limit governs, the obvious move — take the continuous optimum and round it up — needs more steel than any other way of stiffening the truss, and the exact discrete answer is within one per cent of a bound no catalogue can beat.

deflection · Truss deflection Fully stressed, with a choice of diagonals. Two trusses sized so that every member is at the allowable stress under the full load, each member drawn as wide as its area, tension and compression in two colours. Above, an eight-panel Pratt truss as deep as a panel is long, with a counter-diagonal in each of its six interior panels, loaded by 10 at every bottom joint, found by resizing and reanalysing until nothing changes; below, the same truss without its counters. The counters in the two middle panels have shrunk to nothing (dotted) and the four nearer the supports have stayed, working in compression beside the diagonals in tension. The truss that kept them needs 1,200 units of steel against the Pratt's 1,220, and deflects 24.0 at mid-span against 26.0.

The truss whose forces follow its sections

In a determinate truss each member's force is fixed before its section is chosen, so sizing for strength and sizing for stiffness can be done in either order. Put a counter-diagonal in every panel and they cannot. The fully stressed design becomes an iteration that starves some counters to nothing and keeps others, lands on a different truss from every start, and — whichever it lands on — weighs the same and deflects the same. Then enlarge one group of members to stiffen it, and a vertical nobody touched is overloaded by 58 per cent.

deflection · Truss deflection

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

OptimisationDeflectionTrussVirtual workBending momentHaunchMoment diagramSection modulusServiceabilityTapered memberUnit load methodUtilisation

All concepts