Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Concept

Differential settlement — where it appears

The difference in settlement between two parts of a structure, as distinct from how far the whole of it has gone down. A building can settle a hundred millimetres uniformly and be undamaged and twenty differentially and not be, because it is the difference that induces moments and racks the finishes.

Named by 8 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The building does not care how far it went down; it cares how much it tilted. Five footings on soil that is 35% as stiff under one of them, carrying 60 kN/m. They settle between 12 and 54 mm, and the number that matters is neither of those: it is the angular distortion between neighbours, 4.32 per thousand, or one in 231 — against a limit of one in 500 for cracking in finishes, which this does not. A building that went down half a metre uniformly would be undamaged and would need a new front step; this one has moved a twentieth as far and has cracked.

The settlement that matters is the difference

A building that goes down half a metre uniformly is undamaged and needs a new front step. One that goes down a twentieth as far, unevenly, has cracked. The superstructure can even the difference out — and the only way it can do so is by carrying the difference itself, as a force.

deflection · Differential settlement The group is not weaker; it is very much softer. A 3 × 3 pile cap on the left, with each pile's share of 9.0 MN and 4.5 MNm in meganewtons — N/n plus M·y/Σy², the same three terms in the same order as a bolt group under an eccentric load and a section under biaxial bending. The corner piles take 1.25 times the average and a pile added at the centroid would change that by nothing at all, because it adds to neither second moment. On the right is the effect a bolt group cannot have: the piles share ground, so the stress bulbs overlap and the group settles 3.9 times as much as a single pile at the same load per pile, rising to 14.2 for 144 of them. The capacity check everyone makes — block failure against the sum of the piles — comes out at 4.54 here and does not govern at all. The check nobody tabulates is the one that does.

Nine piles, and four times the settlement

A pile cap divides its load between its piles by the same three terms a bolt group uses and a section under biaxial bending uses. What a bolt group does not have is neighbours it shares ground with — and the group effect that matters is not the strength check everybody makes, but a stiffness effect nobody tabulates.

structures · Pile group The check that depends on a date. Total deflection and the deflection occurring after the brittle finishes are built, for one 12 m beam, against the day those finishes go up. The total barely moves — the beam ends up where it ends up. The increment falls from 32 mm at a week to 14 mm at a year, because creep is fast at first and slow later and a partition built early inherits nearly all of it: 44% of the final creep has already happened by day 28. The span/500 limit is 24 mm and the span/250 limit is 48; this beam passes the first only after day 25. Camber subtracts from both terms of the difference and therefore changes the upper curve and not the lower one, which is the reason a cambered beam can satisfy every total-deflection check and still crack the wall.

The limit that depends on a date

Total deflection can nearly always be met, and on a long span it is met with camber. The limit that actually decides the member is the other one — the deflection occurring after the brittle finishes are built — and camber does nothing for it whatever, because it is subtracted from both terms of a difference. The same beam passes or fails on the day the partitions went up.

deflection · Incremental deflection The deflection a building can take, and which way it is bending. The limiting deflection ratio — the sag or hog of a building divided by its length — at a critical tensile strain of 0.075 per cent, against how long the building is compared with its height. Two curves, and the gap between them is the whole finding: hogging is worse than sagging by exactly 2.0 times, because the neutral axis of a hogging building sits near the bottom and the tension face is the full height of the wall. The minimum is at L/H = 1.6, where the two mechanisms cross: a squat building cracks diagonally in shear and a long low one cracks in bending at the extreme fibre.

The crack is a strain, not a slope

Angular distortion is what every table of settlement limits is written in, and it is a proxy. What cracks a building is a tensile strain in it, and reading the building as a deep beam says which of two mechanisms supplies it, why hogging is exactly twice as damaging as sagging, and why a horizontal stretch of a few millimetres takes half the capacity away before the settlement starts.

deflection · Differential settlement A frame bent by nothing at all. A portal of 8.0 m span and 5.0 m columns at EI = 20000.0 kN·m², with its right foot settled 10.0 mm and no load on it anywhere. The moment diagram is drawn on the members: −3.95 kN·m at the left foot, −3.95 at the left knee, −0.00 at the crown, 3.95 and 3.95 on the right. The settlement is drawn hugely magnified; at true scale it is 10.0 mm on an 8.0 m frame. The diagram is antisymmetric, the vertical force the settlement develops is 0.99 kN, and every one of those numbers is proportional to EI.

The load that is not a load

Settle one foot of a portal frame by ten millimetres and the frame develops moments with nothing applied to it anywhere. In the analogous column the case is simpler than a load case, not harder — the section carries no direct stress at all, and the whole answer is one bending stress. And it scales the wrong way: the moments are proportional to EI, so the stiffer the frame, the more a settlement costs it.

deflection · Moment-area A stiff building bridges the trough it stands in. The settlement of a building 30 m long centred on the trough, over a trough 30 mm deep whose inflection points are 15 m from its centre (dashed: the ground with no building), measured from the building's settlement under its own weight, for relative stiffnesses EI/(kₛ·B⁴) of 10⁻⁴, 10⁻³ and 10⁻². At 10⁻⁴ its deflection ratio is 95% of the ground's; at 10⁻³ its deflection ratio is 66% of the ground's; at 10⁻² its deflection ratio is 17% of the ground's. The stiff building settles almost as a rigid body and leaves the trough's curvature to the ground beneath it.

The building the trough cannot bend

A tunnel leaves a settlement trough, and damage criteria are applied to the trough's deflection ratio over the length of each building above it. But a building is not the ground: it has a bending stiffness, and it takes only as much of the ground's curvature as that stiffness lets it. One number decides how much — the building's stiffness over the soil's modulus times its length to the fourth — and over two decades of it a building goes from following the trough to bridging it. Because the length enters to the fourth power, the same building is stiff when short and soft when long.

deflection · Differential settlement A building that crosses the trough at an angle stands on a warped surface. Plan of a 30 × 12 m building 10 m high, its walls 300 mm thick, over a trough 30 mm deep with its inflection 15 m from the tunnel's axis, its long axis 45° from square across the tunnel. The lines are the greenfield trough's settlement contours, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 mm, parallel to the tunnel's axis (dashed). The corners settle A 27.4, B 18.4, C 27.4, D 18.4 mm, so they do not lie in a plane: A and C together settle 18.1 mm more than B and D. A building spanning square across the trough has no such warp, and one lying along it has none either; between the two, the trough twists the building as well as bending it.

The building the trough twists

A building that crosses a tunnel's settlement trough at an angle stands on ground that is warped as well as sagged. Its four corners do not settle into a plane, and beyond about twenty degrees of skew the warp is larger than the sag. Whether the building follows that warp or resists it depends on a property its bending never needed — whether its walls and floors close into a tube — and the same walls, closed or open, differ a thousandfold in their stiffness against it.

deflection · Differential settlement Over many earthquakes the column line ratchets together or stops together. The compression over the squash load of the interior column (solid) and an exterior column (dashed) against the cycles, up to 400, for the frame of three ground-storey columns under floor loads of 15, 20, 25 kN/m on 6 floors; the dotted line is where the hinge starts to ratchet, 0.15. At 15 kN/m the interior column starts at 0.22 and the average is 0.12; after 400 cycles the interior carries 0.15 and the exterior 0.10. At 20 kN/m the interior column starts at 0.29 and the average is 0.16; after 400 cycles the interior carries 0.16 and the exterior 0.16. At 25 kN/m the interior column starts at 0.36 and the average is 0.19; after 400 cycles the interior carries 0.19 and the exterior 0.19. Where the average lies above the threshold the three end at the average and ratchet together; where it lies below, the interior column sheds load until it stops at the threshold and the exterior columns never start.

The floor that cannot keep up with the column

A column whose hinges ratchet under an earthquake shortens every cycle, and in a frame it does not shorten alone: the floors it carries bend down towards it and lift its load onto the columns beside it. That ought to slow it and speed them, until every column shortens together. It does — over hundreds of cycles. Over the ten or twenty of an earthquake, the floors of a six-storey frame lift an eighth of the load off the interior column, it shortens nine tenths as far as it would alone, and the floors carry the whole difference as bending. The frame equalises its columns eventually, and pays for it in its floors.

materials · Moment-curvature

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Deflection ratioElastic foundationRelative stiffnessServiceabilityAngular distortionRedistributionSecond momentSettlement troughStiffnessBeam on springsBearing capacityBlock failure

All concepts