Back analysis — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as bishop method, pore pressure, slope stability — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
A failed slope gives a line, not a soil
A slope that has slipped is the one full-scale strength test geotechnics ever gets, and the standard way to read it is to set its factor of safety to one and solve for the soil. One equation cannot give two strengths. What it gives is a line of cohesions and friction angles, every one of which fails the slope exactly, and the repair designed on one point of that line can be worth a factor of 1.07 or of 1.51. The slip itself says which point: each soil on the line fails along a different surface, and the depth of the scar is the second equation.
Two slips are a shear test
One failed slope gives a line of soils, every one of which fits the failure. Two failed slopes give two lines, and where they cross is a soil that fits both. Whether the crossing means anything depends on how differently the two slopes loaded the ground: two slips at one angle cross only at zero cohesion, two at nearby angles cross anywhere in a twenty-degree band, and a flat, tall slope beside a steep, short one pins the soil to within two degrees — because each slip is a shear test at one normal stress, and a strength line needs two tests far apart.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Bishop methodCohesionEffective stressFactor of safetyFriction anglePore pressureSlope stability