Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Theme

Which failure arrives first — page 11

Essays 241 to 243 of 243 on this thread, in the same order.
Two ways for the same plate to fold. An end plate 200 mm wide with a bolt 45 mm from the web face and 55 mm from the edge, and the two families of yield line it can collapse along. The circle closes round the bolt and is 283 mm of hinge — a circle round the bolt. The straight pattern runs out to the plate's free edges and is 249 mm — hinges to the plate edges. The plate folds along whichever is cheaper, which here is the fan, and the 200 mm that comes out is the length of the equivalent tee stub — a dimension that is nowhere on the plate and is 100 per cent of its width. Connections

How much of the plate is bending

A tee stub is an object nobody builds, and the whole component method rests on replacing a real end plate with one. The length of the substitute is not a dimension of the plate — it is the length of the cheapest fold the plate can collapse along, and two families of fold compete for it on a criterion with no strength in it at all.

 Three quantities converging at three different rates. How much of the exact answer a truncated modal analysis of a ten-storey building reaches, against how many modes it keeps. The mass count is the rule — ninety per cent, reached at two modes. The base shear is ahead of it: one mode carries 85 per cent of the mass and 98 per cent of the base shear. The force in the top storey is behind it, at 80 per cent on one mode and 94 on two. The rule is written in the quantity that converges fastest, and it is checked against a quantity nobody plots. Dynamics

The modes that were left out

Nobody runs every mode a model has, and the rule for how many is a mass count — enough to account for ninety per cent of the structure. The rule is written in the one quantity that converges fastest. On a twenty-storey frame two modes give the base shear to within one per cent and the force in the top storey to within twenty.

 Two capacity curves that agree, from two answers that do not. Base shear against roof drift for the same eight-storey frame with a soft ground storey, pushed with a fixed triangular pattern and with one recomputed from the tangent stiffness at every step. At a roof displacement of 426 mm they differ by 8.7 per cent — which is the number a capacity-spectrum procedure reads, and it is the number that is nearly the same. The storey drifts underneath these two curves differ by a factor of 3.8 at the fourth floor, and the drift is what the analysis was run for. Dynamics

The pattern that stopped describing the building

A pushover analysis pushes with a load pattern chosen to resemble the first mode, and by the time the structure has done anything worth analysing it no longer has that mode. Recomputing the pattern as the frame softens changes the base shear by nine per cent and the drift at the fourth floor by a factor of four.

All themes