Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Theme

The load that will not hold still — page 3

Essays 49 to 72 of 150 on this thread, in the same order.
Two per cent of the traffic and most of the damage. A 120-year traffic spectrum on one detail of category 71, with each band's share of the cycles and its share of the damage. The two bars have almost nothing to do with one another, and the reason is the slope of three: life goes as the inverse cube of the stress range, so a cycle twice as large does eight times the damage and a cycle a third as large does a twenty-seventh of it. A full train is 2% of the crossings and 58% of the damage; and three of the five bands — an ordinary lorry, a van, a car, 90% of the crossings — sit under the cut-off and do none of it at all. The equivalent constant range that would do the same damage in the same number of cycles is 25.5 N/mm², which is the one number a designer is usually handed — and it is a cube-weighted average, so it is nearer the heaviest vehicle than to the average one. Materials

The cycles that do not count

A fatigue spectrum has to be reduced to one number, and the reduction is a cube-weighted average rather than an ordinary one. Two per cent of the traffic does most of the damage, ninety per cent of it does none at all, and the equivalent range that comes out is nearer the heaviest vehicle than the average one.

 Where the drift went. Storey drift at the target displacement, for the same frame with and without a soft ground storey at 50 per cent of the others' stiffness and strength. The regular frame spreads 219 mm over every storey; the soft one reaches 266 mm and puts 5.58 per cent of it into the ground storey against 0.53 next to it — a concentration of 5.9 against 1.7. The roof goes 22 per cent further, and where that extra displacement lands is the whole of the difference between the two buildings. Dynamics

Weaker in one place, and better on every average

Take an eight-storey frame and make its ground storey half as stiff and half as strong. Its ductility demand falls, its first mode carries more of the mass, and its period lengthens into a gentler part of the spectrum. Three global numbers all improve, and the building is the one that collapses.

 What a damper at the anchorage can do, and the ceiling it cannot pass. Modal damping against damper size for a 200 m stay at 4500 kN, with the damper 4 m from the anchorage — 2.0 per cent of the length. Each curve is a mode, found as a complex root of the taut string with a viscous damper in it rather than from a formula. Every one of them peaks at 1.00 per cent of critical, which is x/2L exactly, and the peaks are at different damper sizes — a higher mode wants a smaller damper, because it moves faster at the same amplitude. The curves are flat near their peaks: half the optimum coefficient gives 80 per cent of the ceiling, and so does twice it. Dynamics

The damper that is too near the end

A stay cable has almost no damping of its own, so it is given a damper — and the damper cannot go where the motion is, because the middle of a two-hundred-metre stay is a hundred metres above the road. What it can supply is then decided by one length, and no amount of damper changes it.

 Damping that is computed rather than measured. Radiation damping of a 2.5 m block on soil with a shear wave speed of 178 m/s, against how heavy the block is made — the horizontal axis is a multiple of the 150 tonne block drawn. At that mass the three modes are at 47, 29 and 13 per cent of critical. None of this is dissipation: the energy leaves as waves travelling away into the half-space, so the quantity is a geometrical coupling and it can be computed from the size of the footing, the density of the soil and its shear modulus. Every curve falls as the block gets heavier, because a heavier block moves less for the same wave field — which is the one counter-intuitive thing here: mass buys frequency and costs damping. Dynamics

The damping that is radiated

Every response in this field is quoted with a damping assumption attached, because damping is measured rather than designed and the measurement has a factor of two in it. A machine block on the ground is the exception: its damping is not dissipation at all, and it can be computed from three numbers none of which is a material property of anything that dissipates.

 Where two buildings touch, and what is there when they do. Closure between an 8-storey building 24 m tall and a 4-storey one 15 m tall, drawn against height, with the 50 mm gap between them. The two swaying out of phase close on each other more the higher up they are, so they first touch at 7.6 m and are in contact above it. The dots are the taller building's floors: its storeys are 3.00 m and the other's are 3.75, so two of them arrive part way up a column rather than at a slab. A blow at mid-height of a column asks it for a shear of half the impact and an end moment of Fh/8, neither of which is a demand any part of the design contains. Dynamics

The floor that arrives at a column

The gap between two buildings is computed from their roof displacements, which is where each of them moves most. It is not where they touch, and it is not what is there when they do — a slab edge meeting a column part way up its height is a different event from two slabs meeting, and it is the one that appears in the photographs.

 Three quantities converging at three different rates. How much of the exact answer a truncated modal analysis of a ten-storey building reaches, against how many modes it keeps. The mass count is the rule — ninety per cent, reached at two modes. The base shear is ahead of it: one mode carries 85 per cent of the mass and 98 per cent of the base shear. The force in the top storey is behind it, at 80 per cent on one mode and 94 on two. The rule is written in the quantity that converges fastest, and it is checked against a quantity nobody plots. Dynamics

The modes that were left out

Nobody runs every mode a model has, and the rule for how many is a mass count — enough to account for ninety per cent of the structure. The rule is written in the one quantity that converges fastest. On a twenty-storey frame two modes give the base shear to within one per cent and the force in the top storey to within twenty.

 Two capacity curves that agree, from two answers that do not. Base shear against roof drift for the same eight-storey frame with a soft ground storey, pushed with a fixed triangular pattern and with one recomputed from the tangent stiffness at every step. At a roof displacement of 426 mm they differ by 8.7 per cent — which is the number a capacity-spectrum procedure reads, and it is the number that is nearly the same. The storey drifts underneath these two curves differ by a factor of 3.8 at the fourth floor, and the drift is what the analysis was run for. Dynamics

The pattern that stopped describing the building

A pushover analysis pushes with a load pattern chosen to resemble the first mode, and by the time the structure has done anything worth analysing it no longer has that mode. Recomputing the pattern as the frame softens changes the base shear by nine per cent and the drift at the fourth floor by a factor of four.

 The pier grips, gives, and grips again. A sliding bearing carrying 3000 kN on a pier head of 20 kN/mm, dragged by a deck expanding at 1.7 mm an hour, with a static coefficient of 0.05 and a kinetic one of 0.03. The force in the pier climbs while the bearing grips, reaches 150 kN, and falls in a fraction of a second to 30 kN: the pier springs back under only the kinetic friction, overshoots the 90 kN that friction would hold it at, and grips again. The swing is 120 kN — 2.00 times the 60 kN between the two coefficients — and the pier head jumps 6.00 mm each time, three times in 12 hours. Equilibrium

The pier that moves in jumps

A sliding bearing whose static friction is larger than its kinetic friction does not release a slow thermal movement as a drift. It grips, gives and grips again, and each time the force in the pier swings by twice the difference between the two coefficients — whatever the pier is made of.

 Same deck, same load, and two pier forces. A deck bearing on a pier of 20 kN/mm with μ = 0.03, taken to the same final state two ways: the deck moves 4 mm over the pier, and the bearing's load rises from 2000 to 4000 kN. Moved first, while the bearing carries 2000 kN, the pier force reaches the limit of 60 kN and the bearing slides for the rest of the movement; the load arriving afterwards raises the limit and changes nothing, and the pier is left carrying 60 kN. Loaded first, the limit is 120 kN before the deck moves, the bearing grips throughout, and the pier carries 80 kN. Both states are at the same displacement under the same load, and both satisfy equilibrium and the friction bound; the order is the only difference, and it appears in neither. Equilibrium

The order the loads arrived in

Statics allows a contact with friction a whole range of forces and has no way to choose between them. A real structure does choose, and what it chooses by is the order in which things happened to it — so the force in a pier under a sliding bearing is a record of its history, not a function of its loads.

 The same pulse on a wall that is designed to rock. Rotation as a fraction of the toppling angle under one 0.8 s sine pulse of 1.00 g, for the same 2.0 × 8.0 m wall of 400 kN three ways. Bare, it lifts at 0.250 g; with a 600 kN tendon it lifts at 0.625 g. The bare wall reaches 79 per cent of its toppling angle with one landing; with the tendon it reaches 27 per cent of its toppling angle with eight landings; with tendon and bars it reaches 12 per cent of its toppling angle with 43 landings. With its bars it comes to rest upright. The landings are where the bare wall loses energy; the bars add a loss that does not wait for a landing. Dynamics

A wall that is allowed to lift

A block that rocks inherits everything that decides whether it survives — a restoring moment set by its weight and shape that falls as it leans, and a loss of energy set by its proportions at each landing. Put a tendon through a wall and yielding bars across its base and both become design quantities, and the ratio between them decides whether the wall comes home.

 Two separate checks, and the block that is neither. Amplification of the steady displacement at a machine 2.0 m above the base of a 150 tonne block 5.0 m across and 2.0 m deep, against forcing frequency. Checked separately, the block sways at 11.2 Hz with 29 per cent of critical damping and rocks at 15.0 Hz with 13 per cent, and the rocking check's peak is 3.99. Because its mass sits above its base the two are one system, with modes at 9.9 Hz and 20.9 Hz — one below both checks and one above — and the block's own peak is 2.49 at 9.7 Hz. Dynamics

The frequency below both checks

A machine block is checked for sway and for rocking as if they were two oscillators, each with its own spring, its own radiation damping and its own natural frequency. A block whose mass sits above its base is one oscillator with two modes, and neither of them is a sway or a rocking — one sits below both checks, one above both, and the lower one is where the machine resonates.

 However stiff the ties, a free line stops short. The first three frequencies of stays 180, 150 and 120 m long joined by cross-ties, against the stiffness of each tie from 1.0 kN/m to 1000 MN/m, with the line free at its ends and, dashed, anchored to the deck at both ends with the same stiffness. With the line free the first frequency rises from 0.73 Hz and levels off at 0.82 Hz, however stiff the ties are made — short of the 1.01 Hz of the 120 m stay, which a free line cannot pass. Anchored, the first frequency reaches 1.09 Hz. At the 6.0 MN/m marked, the free line gives 0.82 Hz and the anchored line 1.09 Hz. Dynamics

The line of ties that stops short

Cross-ties are the one intervention on a stay cable that changes its frequencies rather than damping them, and the usual account says they lift the stays out of the range that excites them. A line of ties that is not anchored to anything cannot lift the first frequency above the shortest stay's own, however stiff the ties are made. What lifts it is carrying the line to the deck.

 One collision, four contact laws, one impulse. Contact force against time for one collision between 500 t and 300 t closing at 1.94 m/s, under four contact laws sharing one contact constant of 2.8×10^9 N/m^1.5. The elastic linear spring peaks at 19.7 MN and lasts 58 ms; the Hertz law peaks at 22.0 MN over 61 ms. Set to a restitution of 0.65, the spring and dashpot peaks at 16.8 MN and ends pulling at 3.5 MN, a tension two faces in contact cannot carry, while the damped Hertz law peaks at 20.1 MN and returns a restitution of 0.77 instead. The areas under the curves are the impulses: 600 kN·s for the spring and dashpot, which is what momentum requires at 0.65, 646 for the damped Hertz law, and 727 for both elastic laws. Dynamics

The force that belongs to the model

When two buildings meet, momentum decides what each of them feels, and no contact law can change it. What the contact law decides is the force, and the force it reports is the contact stiffness somebody assumed, raised to a power. Four laws and a hundredfold change of stiffness move the buildings by a few per cent and the force by a factor of eight.

 The rates a seated crowd makes worse. The stand's steady rms acceleration under 40 people jumping, against the rate they jump at, for a stand of 30 t modal mass at 6 Hz with 2 per cent damping, empty and with 15 t of spectators sitting on it. Empty, the worst rate is 3.00 Hz, where the second harmonic of the jump lands on the stand's own frequency, and the stand reaches 2.54 m/s², 25.9 per cent of gravity. Occupied, the worst anywhere from 1.5 to 3.5 Hz is 0.49 m/s² at 3.50 Hz. But from 1.64 to 2.32 Hz, shaded, the occupied stand responds more than the empty one — 1.6 times as much at 2.00 Hz. Dynamics

The crowd that is also the structure

A crowd jumping to music loads a grandstand with harmonics several times those of walking, and nothing about their size is measured: they follow from a pulse that has to average one body weight. But the people who jump arrive with the people who sit, and the seated crowd is mass, stiffness and damping bolted to the stand. It lowers the worst case by a factor of five and makes the most common jumping rates worse.

 The frequencies at which a moving deck makes a stay grow. Stability of the first mode of a 120 m stay at 3,500 kN inclined at 25°, whose own frequency is 1.01 Hz, when the deck at its anchorage moves at a frequency Ω against the stay's ω, plotted against the swing in tension the movement produces. Inside each shaded region a small disturbance grows. Each region's tip is at a swing of four times the damping ratio — 0.40%, 2.0% and 4.0% for damping of 0.10%, 0.50% and 1.0% — and it widens as the swing grows, to a deck between 1.970 and 2.030 times the stay's frequency at a 6.0% swing with 0.10% damping. With no damping, dashed, the region reaches down to no swing at all. A deck moving ±5, ±10 and ±20 mm vertically swings the tension by 0.70%, 1.4% and 2.8%. At ±10 mm and exactly twice the stay's frequency, marked, the stay grows with damping of 0.10% and settles with 0.50% and 1.0%. Dynamics

The stay shaken along its own length

A deck that moves at a stay's anchorage pushes nothing across the stay. It stretches the stay along its own line and lets it go again, so the tension swings, and at twice the stay's frequency that swing drives the stay with no sideways force at all. Whether the swing grows is one comparison — a quarter of the tension swing against the damping ratio — and it is a comparison the capped damper wins.

 A link that keeps two buildings apart has made them one. The largest closing movement between a 500 t building with a 0.8 s period and a 300 t building with a 1.2 s period, 50 mm apart, under one 1.0 s sine pulse of 0.50 g, and each building's largest displacement, against the size of a viscous damper joining them across the gap, from 0.01 MN·s/m to 541.3 MN·s/m. With no link they close by 515 mm, and the stiffer building moves 220 mm and the softer 419 mm. The link that takes the most energy out, 0.64 MN·s/m, still lets them close by 214 mm. The least that keeps the 50 mm gap is 4.8 MN·s/m, where the stiffer building moves 269 mm and the softer 280 mm. At the largest link the two move together, 281 mm and 281 mm. Dynamics

The damper that ends up as a joint

A damper across the gap between two buildings acts on exactly the motion the gap is sized for, and it can be sized for two different things. The size that takes the most energy out of the pair still lets the buildings collide. The size that keeps them apart has nearly stopped moving: it has joined them into one building, and the stiffer of the two pays for it in drift.

 A filler sets the force, until it runs out of thickness. Contact force against the movement since first touch for one collision between 500 t and 300 t on a 40 mm filler crushing at 4 MPa over 5 m², 60 per cent of it crushable, at closing speeds of 1.00, 1.94 and 2.85 m/s. The filler loads elastically, then crushes at 20.0 MN for as long as it has thickness to give. At 1.00 m/s it crushes 4 mm and the force never passes 20.0 MN; at 1.94 m/s it crushes 17 mm and the force never passes 20.0 MN; at 2.85 m/s it crushes all 24 mm it can and the faces meet through it, peaking at 23.7 MN. Dashed, the bare contact at 2.85 m/s peaks at 35.0 MN. Dynamics

The force a filler can promise

A crushable filler in the gap between two buildings replaces a contact stiffness nobody knows with a crush strength somebody chose, and the force of a collision becomes that strength — for as long as the filler has thickness left to crush. Energy decides how much thickness that has to be, and in a gap sized for buildings that were never meant to meet it is not much.

 After a yield, the prestress left does not remember the prestress put in. The prestress left in the tendon of a 2.0 × 8.0 m rocking wall of 400 kN once it has rocked to each rotation and come back upright, for a tendon yielding at 1,370 kN and stiffening by 20 kN a millimetre as the base opens, prestressed to 300 kN, 600 kN and 900 kN. Each keeps all its prestress until it yields — at 53.5 mrad, 38.5 mrad and 23.5 mrad — and then loses 20 kN for every further milliradian, so past 53.5 mrad the three lines are one: the yield force less the stiffness times the stretch. Every one of them is slack at upright past 68.5 mrad. With bars of 400 kN the wall re-centres only while 400 kN remains, dashed, and it keeps that only up to 48.5 mrad, whatever it was prestressed to. Dynamics

The tendon that forgets its prestress

A rocking wall comes home because a tendon pulls it, and the tendon must not yield — yet the rotations that test the wall are exactly the ones that stretch it. Past its yield, the force a tendon keeps is its yield force less its stiffness times the stretch, whatever it was prestressed to, so the guarantee a design needs is a limit on rotation, and more prestress only reaches that limit sooner.

 Set into the ground, the block is quieter only while its sides radiate. Displacement at the top per kilonewton of machine force for a 150 tonne block 3.2 m across and 3.2 m deep, on a logarithmic scale: on the surface, dashed, and with 1.60 m of it set into the ground, first with the side soil radiating as the side-layer model gives it and then with no radiation from the sides at all, dashed. On the surface it peaks at 191.8 µm per kN at 5.5 Hz. Embedded and radiating, it peaks at 11.0 µm per kN at 8.2 Hz. With the same embedment and silent sides the resonance moves up to 8.4 Hz and peaks at 168.7 µm per kN, because the lower mode's damping falls from 3.2 per cent to 1.6 per cent. At 5.5 Hz the three give 191.1, 8.0 and 9.5 µm per kN. Dynamics

The damping that comes through the sides

A machine block set into the ground is held at its sides as well as its base, and the side soil does two things at once. It lifts the height at which the ground's resistance acts toward the block's centre of mass, which weakens the coupling between sway and rocking without ever removing it. And it radiates, which is what actually flattens the resonance — so the quiet an embedded block promises rests on the stiffness of backfill nobody measured.

 The largest cycle in the record is not between two neighbouring reversals. A 26-second stress record at the mid-span detail of a 20 m road bridge, as seven vehicles cross it and the deck rings at 4 Hz after each: a heavy lorry at 1.0 s, a car at 5.2 s, a van at 8.0 s, an ordinary lorry at 12.0 s, a second lorry meeting it at 12.3 s, a car at 17.0 s, the heaviest vehicle of the record at 20.0 s. With a reversal threshold of 0.5 N/mm² the record has 185 reversals, and rainflow pairs them into 92 cycles. The four largest loops are marked, each by a line joining the two reversals that close it: 74.3 N/mm² between 20.6 s and 21.2 s; 45.1 N/mm² between 1.5 s and 2.2 s; 38.5 N/mm² between 12.6 s and 13.5 s; 16.5 N/mm² between 8.5 s and 8.9 s. The largest is the record's whole range, from its lowest point to its highest. Counted between successive reversals instead, the largest range anywhere in the record is 38.1 N/mm², because the deck's ringing puts reversals on every rise and every fall. Materials

Which reversal closes the loop

A strain-gauge record is a wiggle, not a list of cycles, and its damage depends on how its reversals are paired. Rainflow pairs each one with the reversal that closes its hysteresis loop. Counting the ranges between neighbours breaks every lorry's cycle into pieces, and on one bridge record it gives a detail 424 years where rainflow gives it 34.

 Half of the creep is the member drying out. The creep coefficient of a concrete of mean strength 38 N/mm² loaded at 28 days, in a member of notional size 150 mm, against time since loading: exposed to air at 50 per cent relative humidity, and the same member sealed so that it cannot dry. After a year the exposed member's coefficient is 1.93 and the sealed member's 0.81; after 50 years they are 2.45 and 1.28. The shaded difference, 48 per cent of the exposed member's final creep, is what drying adds. The sealed member's coefficient has no size in it; the drying part is where the member comes in. Materials

The creep that belongs to the member

A creep coefficient is quoted for a concrete, and half of it is not a property of the concrete. It is the member drying out, and drying goes through the surface — so one mix creeps a quarter more in a thin slab than in a deep beam, gets there years sooner, and in saturated air forgets its size altogether.

 The humidity through a slab's depth, and the strain it asks for. A slab 200 mm thick drying through its top face only into air at 50 per cent, with its underside sealed by a steel deck. Left, the pore humidity against depth at 28 days — 50 per cent at the surface and 100 at the base; 90 days — 50 per cent at the surface and 100 at the base; 1 year — 50 per cent at the surface and 99 at the base; 5 years — 50 per cent at the surface and 74 at the base; 20 years — 50 per cent at the surface and 51 at the base. Right, the free strain each of those profiles asks for, taken as shrinkage at the local humidity. At 28 days the top wants to be 461 microstrain shorter than it was and the bottom 0; at 20 years the two are 461 and 456, and the gradient that produced the curl has gone. Not one of the profiles is straight, and a section that stays plane cannot deliver any of them. Materials

The slab that dries from one face

A creep coefficient is one number for a member, and a member drying through one face does not have one. Give every depth its own humidity and the section a strain profile it cannot deliver, and two things follow that no single coefficient contains — a six-metre slab lifts eleven millimetres at its edges with nothing on it, and its top surface is past cracking before it has been loaded.

 Where a tendon's force goes, over fifty years. The loss of stress in a tendon stressed to 1300 N/mm² and released at 7 days into a member of notional size 300 mm at 70 per cent humidity, with the three causes stacked. At 28 days the total is 61.9 N/mm²; at a year 131.5; at fifty years 190.8, which is 14.7 per cent of what the tendon started with. Creep supplies 107.7 of that, drying and autogenous shrinkage 50.6, and the steel's own relaxation 32.5. Half the loss has happened by 119 d and nine-tenths by 8 y. Materials

The prestress the member takes back

A tendon is stretched, locked off against the concrete, and then has to hold that extension while the concrete underneath it shortens by itself. Fifteen per cent of the force goes, most of it to creep, and how much goes is decided by the shape of the member and the air it stands in rather than by anything about the steel.

 The cross term has the sign of the two contributions. Four responses of the floor, each combined three ways and divided by the complete quadratic combination at ρ = 0.50. Base shear: modal 927 and 839 kN, so the root-sum-square is 0.82 of it and the absolute sum 1.15. Base torque: modal -8640 and 8640 kNm, so the root-sum-square is 1.41 of it and the absolute sum 2.00. Flexible edge: modal 60 and -6 mm, so the root-sum-square is 1.05 of it and the absolute sum 1.15. Stiff edge: modal -5 and 47 mm, so the root-sum-square is 1.05 of it and the absolute sum 1.15. Where the two modes push the same way the root-sum-square is short; where they push opposite ways it is long. Dynamics

The twist the combination rule invents

Two modes close together respond together, and the square root of the sum of squares assumes they do not. The error has the sign of the two modal contributions: where they agree, as they do in base shear, the rule comes up short, and where they oppose, as they always do in torque, it comes up long — by a factor of five for a floor whose stiffness sits twenty centimetres off its mass, a torque the building does not have.

All themes