Generator

One slit, and the torsional stiffness falls by a factor of hundreds

Rendered here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it — which is the same list as the blast radius of changing it.

One slit, and the torsional stiffness falls by a factor of hundreds. A 200 by 200 box of 8 mm wall, drawn closed and then slit along its length. Closed, the torque runs round the wall as a shear flow and the torsion constant is 5.66×10⁷ mm⁴; slit, the loop is broken and only each wall's own thickness resists, giving 1.31×10⁵ mm⁴. The ratio is 432 to one, so the same torque twists the slit section 432 times as far and raises a peak shear stress 36 times as high. Nothing about the material changed.

14 essays call torsion-compare. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

Internal forces

The moment that will not lie flat

A plane cut exposes three actions. A real cut exposes six, and the fourth of them behaves unlike the others — torsion is resisted by a loop of shear, and one slit down the length of a tube destroys it.

A torque diagram is a shear diagram about a different axis. A torque of 40 kNm applied 2 m along a member of 6 m held against twist at both ends. The two ends take 26.7 and 13.3 kNm, in inverse proportion to their distances, because the two halves are springs in parallel and torsional stiffness is GJ over length. The diagram steps at the applied torque and closes at the far end, exactly as a shear diagram does — the only difference is which axis the arrows turn about.

Internal forces

The internal force with no diagram

A cut through a member reveals four things, and this collection has drawn diagrams for three of them. The fourth is a torque, it obeys exactly the same rules, and whether it exists at all can depend on a decision the designer is free to make.

The flanges go opposite ways, and the pair of them is the bimoment. A 305 by 165 mm I-section held against warping and twisted by 0.5 kN·m, with the section on the left and the two flanges seen in plan on the right. At the built-in end each flange bends in its own plane, one way at the top and the other at the bottom, through 29.3 mm at the free end — drawn 20 times its true size against the 6 m length. The pair of flange shears is 1.69 kN each, and 1.69 × 295 mm is 0.500 kN·m — the whole torque at that section, carried by two forces neither of which is a torque. The pair of flange moments is 3.04 kN·m each, and 3.04 × 295 mm is 0.897 kN·m², which is the bimoment. It puts 67.0 N/mm² into two diagonally opposite flange tips and takes the same out of the other two, so its net force and its net moment about every axis are zero — which is exactly why no member diagram has a place for it.

Sections and stress

The section that cannot stay flat

Twist an I-section and its cross-section dishes out of its own plane. Stop that happening at one end and the member finds a second way to resist — the flanges bend in opposite directions — and the stress resultant that describes it has units nothing else in statics has.

The plan a straight beam does not have. A beam of radius 12 m turning through 60°, seen from above, with bending drawn outward from the axis in one colour and torsion in the other. The load is vertical and uniform and nothing is applied off the axis. Bending reaches 446 and torsion 155; the two peaks are in different places, which is why the section has to be chosen for a combination rather than for either.

Internal forces

Bending that arrives as twist

A straight beam under a vertical load carries no torsion unless something applies one. A beam whose axis curves on plan carries torsion everywhere, from the same load, with nothing applied off the axis — and it cannot be simply supported at all.

One of these two curves is a stiffness and the other is a statement of statics. The torque a spandrel beam carries, against how much of its torsional stiffness is left. The rising curve is compatibility torsion — a floor beam framing into the side of the spandrel, which shares its fixed-end moment of 197 kNm between the spandrel's torsional stiffness and its own flexural one. Uncracked, the spandrel takes 51% of it, or 100 kNm; at a quarter of that stiffness it takes 21%, or 41 kNm, and the floor beam picks up what was shed. The flat line is equilibrium torsion — a canopy cantilevering 2.2 m off the same spandrel, whose 116 kNm is fixed by statics and contains no stiffness at all. The first can be designed away by accepting a rotation. The second cannot be designed away by anything.

Internal forces

The torsion that goes away if you let it

A spandrel beam attracts a torque in proportion to its own torsional stiffness. Crack it and the stiffness falls by a factor of four, the torque falls with it, and nothing has failed — because the floor beam it was competing with picks up exactly what was shed. A canopy hung off the same spandrel is a different animal entirely.

An eccentric load is three load cases, and only two of them are checked. A line load of 40 N/mm at 1.5 m from the axis of a 3.0 by 2.0 m box, replaced by the three cases it is equivalent to. Bending is the load on the axis. The torque 60 kNm per metre then splits into a set of edge forces that drives Bredt's shear flow and distorts nothing, and a set with the flange forces reversed — 10.0 kN/m up one web and down the other, 15.0 kN/m across the flanges — which carries no torque at all and squashes the rectangle into the rhombus drawn behind it. Its generalised load is exactly half the torque, so a box girder spends half of an eccentric load's torsion on changing its own shape, and no torsion calculation contains that half.

Sections and stress

The section that will not keep its shape

A box girder is closed, so torsion costs it almost nothing. What an eccentric load actually does to it is something a torsion calculation contains no term for — the rectangle becomes a parallelogram, in its own plane, along the whole length of the span.

Sections and stress

The slit that costs a factor of six hundred

Bending stiffness cares where the material is, and changes by a factor of two or three between sensible sections of the same area. Torsional stiffness cares whether the material forms a closed loop, and the penalty for not doing so is an order of magnitude squared.

A soap film over a hole, and its volume is the torsion constant. The stress function for Saint-Venant torsion of a square of 100 mm, relaxed on a 97 by 97 grid until it stopped moving — 385 sweeps. Its contours are the lines the shear stress runs along, its slope is the magnitude of that stress, and twice its volume is the torsion constant: 1.4053e+7 mm⁴ against a closed form of 1.4058e+7, an error of -0.035 per cent. The steepest slope is 67.515 at the boundary, at the point on it nearest the centre — which is why the peak shear in a solid section is at the middle of the longest side and never at a corner, where the film comes down to zero from two directions and its slope vanishes.

Sections and stress

Two volumes, and both of them are torques

Torsion of a solid section that is not a circle has no elementary answer, and for thirty years after Saint-Venant posed it the only way to get one was to blow a soap film over a hole cut in a plate and measure it. The film is not an illustration of the solution. It is the solution, and so is a heap of sand poured on the same hole.

The web down the middle carries no torsion at all. A 2-cell box 3.0 m wide and 1.5 m deep under 4000 kNm of torque. Statics gives one equation, T = 2 Σ q_i A_i, and there are 2 unknown flows — so the section is torsionally redundant and the missing statements are that every cell twists by the same amount. Solving that system gives 444.4 and 444.4 N/mm in the cells, so the internal web carries 0.00 N/mm — 0.00 per cent of the outer wall's. J is 2.3679e+12 mm⁴ against 2.3679e+12 for the same outline with no internal web at all, a ratio of 1.000000. The same walls slit open would give 7.413e+10, so closure is worth 32 times and the internal web is worth what the ratio says.

Sections and stress

Two cells, one equation, and a web with nothing in it

Bredt's formula answers a single closed cell because a single closed cell has one unknown and one equation. Put a web down the middle and there are two unknowns and still one equation — and the answer, when the missing statement is supplied, is that the new web carries exactly nothing.

A buckling load with no compression anywhere in the member. A tube of radius 81.6 mm and wall 5 mm under pure torque — no axial load at all — buckles into a helix at T = 2πEI/L, which for the section drawn is 1877 kNm. Two things are absent from that expression and both are surprising: the length appears to the first power rather than the second, and the shear modulus does not appear at all, so the torsional stiffness of the member has nothing to do with the torque at which it buckles in torsion. The comparison is the torque that yields the same tube, 42.9 kNm — a factor of 43.8 below it. The mode arrives first only past a length of 263 m, which is πE/τ_y = 3219 radii and contains no thickness whatever.

Stability

The buckling load with no compression in it

Twist a straight bar hard enough and it snaps into a helix, with no axial load on it anywhere. The load at which that happens is 2πEI/L — first power of the length, and no shear modulus in it at all, so how stiff the bar is in torsion has nothing to do with the torque that buckles it in torsion.

The deformation with no limit against it. A 8 m open section carrying 12 kN/m at an eccentricity of 75 mm from its shear centre. The torque is small — 900 Nmm per mm — and the twist is not: 3.40° at mid-span with the ends restrained against warping, against 9.09° if they are not, a factor of 2.67. What that angle does is move the flange tip sideways by 11.9 mm — 82 per cent of the member's own vertical deflection, and 37 per cent of the span/250 that vertical deflection is checked against. The same load on a closed section of the same depth moves it 0.15 mm, 80 times less. No code gives a limit for this quantity, so it is the one movement in the collection that is computed only after somebody has complained about it.

Deflection

The movement with no limit against it

Every code in the world gives a deflection limit. None gives a twist limit — and a beam loaded off its shear centre twists. On an open section a modest eccentricity moves the flange tip further sideways than four fifths of the sag that does get checked, and nothing anywhere says whether that is acceptable.

Two diagrams for one load, and the second one has no straight-beam ancestor. Bending moment and torsion round a 90° arc of radius 6 m under a uniform load, built in at one end. The bending peaks at 576 and the torsion at 329, 57% of it. Both are zero at the free end and largest at the support, which is where a curved cantilever's bearing has to hold a torque it was probably not asked for.

Internal forces

The torque that has nowhere to go

A curved beam on two supports splits its torsion between them, and the two halves cancel at mid-span. A curved cantilever has one end, so every increment of torque accumulates toward it — and the largest action at the root of a curved balcony is one that a straight beam does not have at all.

The shear centre of a channel. A channel of 100 by 250, with the shear flow in its flanges drawn. Those flows form a couple, so the load has to be applied 38.0 outside the web to leave the section untwisted — a point in the air, outside the material entirely.

Sections and stress

The eccentricity a purlin cannot avoid

A channel's shear centre is outside the material, so a load applied anywhere on the section misses it. The distance is fixed by the proportions rather than by the detailing, it is 38 mm on an ordinary purlin, and the torque it produces is not an error anybody made.

Two webs of one box, carrying different amounts of the same load. The equivalent stress on each web of a 3.0 × 2.0 m box along the half span, under 40 N/mm at an eccentricity of 1500 mm, with the bending stress alone drawn for comparison. The two webs carry the same bending and opposite torsion, so one gets the sum and the other the difference: at the quarter point the loaded web is at 116 N/mm² and the far web at 11, a ratio of 10.9. A check made on the section rather than on the wall reports the average of two numbers that differ by that much.

Sections and stress

Three actions on one web

A load applied off the centreline of a box girder is three actions at once, and every textbook decomposes it into them. What the decomposition does not say is that all three land on the same piece of plate — added on one web and subtracted on the other, so the two walls of one section differ by a factor of ten.

The library, page 6 of 7 — where torsion-compare sits