Generator

A line of thrust, and the masonry it has to stay inside

Rendered here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it — which is the same list as the blast radius of changing it.

A line of thrust, and the masonry it has to stay inside. An arch ring of 9% of the span in thickness, rising 28% of the span, under its own weight as a uniform load. Any horizontal thrust between 3.85 and 5.23 puts a line of compression entirely inside the masonry, so the arch stands — and which of them it actually takes is not decided by statics. The two extremes are drawn: the minimum-thrust line, which rides high at the crown and low at the haunches, and the maximum-thrust line, which does the opposite.

10 essays call thrust-line. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

Structural form

The line that must stay inside

A masonry arch does not stand because its shape is right. It stands because some line of compression can be drawn inside the stonework — any one will do, and there are infinitely many to choose from.

A base plate, and when the bolts start working. A 500 × 400 mm plate carrying 600 kN and 90 kN·m, so the resultant sits 150 mm from the centre against a kern of 83.33 mm. The plate is in partial contact: bearing over 300 mm at a peak of 10 N/mm², with the holding-down bolts carrying 0 kN. The plate lifts at 50 kN·m and crushes at 120 kN·m, and the bolts are not needed until 150 kN·m.

Connections

Where the structure meets the ground, and when the bolts start working

Push a base plate off its middle third and it lifts off the foundation. The holding-down bolts then carry exactly nothing, and go on carrying nothing until the plate has crushed the concrete underneath it.

Sections and stress

The middle third

A material that cannot be pulled imposes a condition on where the load may land, and the condition is a region rather than a point. For a rectangle it is the famous middle third; for every other section it is a shape nobody quotes, and one ordinary section's is nearly twice as generous as the rule allows.

The hoops change their mind at an angle no proportion chose. The two membrane forces of a spherical dome of radius 30 m under 3 kN/m² of surface, taken from the crown to a base at 60°. The free body for the meridional force is the cap above a cone of half-angle φ, and vertical equilibrium of it gives N_φ = −wR/(1 + cos φ) directly: -45.0 kN/m at the crown falling to -60.0 at the base, compression everywhere. Equilibrium normal to the surface then gives the hoop force, which starts at -45.0 kN/m and reaches 15.0 — it changes sign, and the angle at which it does was found here by bisecting N_θ rather than quoted: 51.827292°. Setting N_θ = 0 gives cos²φ + cos φ − 1 = 0, so cos φ is (√5 − 1)/2, the reciprocal of the golden ratio — an identity this site's solver gate checks against the bisection to nine decimals rather than asserting, because it is too pretty to be believed on sight. Below that parallel the hoops are in tension, which masonry has none of, and that is where every old dome is cracked.

Structural form

The surface that carries by being curved

A flat plate spends its thickness on a lever arm of a few millimetres. Curve the same sheet and the load is carried in the surface itself, at a thirtieth of the thickness — and the entire bill is presented at the edges.

The same restraint, twice, with opposite signs. A 4 m strip of 200 mm slab whose ends cannot move apart, against deflection measured in its own thicknesses. The flat line is what a yield-line calculation gives, which is what the same strip would carry if its ends were free: 30.0 per unit width. The rising branch is compressive membrane action — the deflected strip is forced into an arch — and it peaks at 116.6, which is 3.89 times the yield-line load, at a deflection of 0.24 of the thickness. Past that the arch runs out of depth and the load falls back to the flexural one; past a deflection of one thickness there is no arch left and the reinforcement starts carrying the strip as a cable. It gets back to the arch's load at 2.17 thicknesses, which is one part in 9 of the span — a sag nobody would design for and exactly what a floor does instead of falling.

Internal forces

The force nobody put in the model

A slab strip whose ends cannot move apart is not the strip in the yield-line calculation. Deflecting shortens the chord between its ends, the ends do not come in, and the strip is forced into an arch — worth four times the load it was designed for, at a movement nobody would see.

The tie is a redundancy, so its stiffness decides the thrust. Thrust and rib bending for a 60 m tied arch of 0.15 rise ratio, against the stiffness of its tie. Cut the tie and the structure is a curved simply supported beam, so the tie force is the one redundant and the force method gives it: with a rigid tie the answer is 2229 kN, within 0.9 per cent of the funicular wL²/8f, and the shortfall is the arch's own axial shortening. A real tie stretches 68 mm and returns 2168 kN — 2.7 per cent of the flexibility is the tie — and whatever thrust the arch does not get, it carries as bending: 739 kNm at 30 m. A tenth of the tie stiffness is not a tenth of the problem; it is a different structure.

Structural form

The thrust that never reaches the ground

Every arch on this site has ended at the same sentence — the foundation is where an arch is really decided. A tie changes the sentence without changing the arithmetic: the horizontal force is still there, still the same size, and it now closes on itself through a bar at deck level.

Equilibrium

Two ways of being wrong

Plastic analysis has two theorems and they point in opposite directions. Any equilibrium field that nowhere exceeds the plastic moment gives a load at or below the collapse load; any mechanism gives one at or above it. Only one of those errors is safe.

$A straight line, and the comfortable case is already two thirds down it. The capacity of a 215 mm masonry wall as a fraction of its squash load, against the eccentricity of the resultant. Nothing in this figure is a buckling calculation. A material that cannot be pulled bears on a strip of width 3(t/2 − e) under a triangular stress block, so the capacity is exactly 1.5f(t − 2e) — a straight line, zero when the resultant reaches the face, and already at 67% at the edge of the kern. The middle third is treated everywhere as the comfortable case; a wall loaded there has given away a third of its capacity before slenderness has been mentioned. The lower line is the same wall with slenderness in it, which enters as an ADDITIONAL eccentricity of 17.4 mm rather than as a reduced stress — h_ef²/2400t, for h_ef = 3000 mm. Euler's load for this wall is 9.6 times what the eccentricity rule allows, which is why no masonry calculation contains it.$ Stability

It does not buckle, it runs out of width

Every stability failure in this collection is a member that could have carried tension deciding to go sideways instead. Masonry cannot carry tension, and its failure under an eccentric load is not a bifurcation at all — the bearing area simply shrinks until it runs out. The capacity is exactly linear in the eccentricity, Euler's load is ten times anything allowed, and no material property appears until the very end.

The middle third, computed. The kern of a 300 × 600 mm rectangle, computed by asking, for every direction, how far the resultant can move before the far face would be pulled. It reaches ±100.0 mm vertically and ±50.0 mm horizontally, which are h/6 and b/6 exactly, and the region between is a rhombus rather than the ellipse the two numbers suggest — a resultant on a diagonal has less room than either axis allows.

Materials

The strength thrown away on purpose

Masonry, concrete and soil are all analysed as though they had no tensile strength whatever. Each of them has some. The decision to set it to zero is the single most consequential modelling assumption in the subject, it is safe for one kind of check and unsafe for another, and almost nothing that uses it says which.

A tenth of a per cent of the thrust is all of the moment. The thrust a two-hinged arch loses to its own axial shortening, against rise-to-span. The flexibility equation's denominator has two terms — ∫y²ds/EI for bending and ∫cos²θ ds/EA for shortening — and their ratio is about (15/8)(i/f)², the square of the radius of gyration over the RISE. At the 10 per cent rise drawn that is 0.10 per cent of the thrust, which sounds like a rounding error and is not: a parabolic arch under a uniform load is funicular, so the rigid solution has NO crown moment at all, and the 0.10 per cent that the rib shortening removes from the thrust leaves 28 kNm behind. The correction that is a tenth of a per cent of the thrust is a hundred per cent of the bending. At a two per cent rise the loss is 2.6 per cent, because a shallow arch's thrust is enormous and its lever arm is not.

Deflection

The arch that gets shorter

A parabolic arch under a uniform load is funicular, so the perfect solution gives it no bending at all. Then the rib shortens under its own thrust by a tenth of a per cent, and every kilonewton-metre of moment the arch will ever carry comes from that.

The library, page 6 of 7 — where thrust-line sits