Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Generator

Shear stress across a section

Rendered here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it — which is the same list as the blast radius of changing it.
Shear stress across a section. The distribution of shear stress over an I-section, computed as VQ/It by accumulating the first moment of the area above every height. The peak is 0.41 against a mean of 0.19 — a ratio of 2.15 — and it falls at the neutral axis, where the bending stress is zero.

Shear stress across a section. The distribution of shear stress over an I-section, computed as VQ/It by accumulating the first moment of the area above every height. The peak is 0.41 against a mean of 0.19 — a ratio of 2.15 — and it falls at the neutral axis, where the bending stress is zero.

13 essays call shear-flow. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

Shear stress across a section. The distribution of shear stress over an I-section, computed as VQ/It by accumulating the first moment of the area above every height. The peak is 0.41 against a mean of 0.19 — a ratio of 2.15 — and it falls at the neutral axis, where the bending stress is zero. Sections and stress

The shear nobody draws

A stack of loose planks slides at its ends when it is loaded. Glue them and the sliding stops — and whatever the glue is now carrying is a stress that no bending calculation contains.

 The shear centre of a channel. A channel of 80 by 200, with the shear flow in its flanges drawn. Those flows form a couple, so the load has to be applied 31.7 outside the web to leave the section untwisted — a point in the air, outside the material entirely. Sections and stress

The point that is not in the section

A channel loaded down its web twists. To stop it, the load must be applied through a point outside the steel entirely — in the air beside the section, where nothing can be attached.

 Shear stress across a section. The distribution of shear stress over an I-section, computed as VQ/It by accumulating the first moment of the area above every height. The peak is 82.77 against a mean of 38.46 — a ratio of 2.15 — and it falls at the neutral axis, where the bending stress is zero. At the junction between flange and web the flow is 820.0 per unit length, so connectors of 20000 each have to be spaced no further apart than 24 — which is what turns two pieces into one section. Sections and stress

The section made of pieces

Two plates bolted together are twice as strong as one plate. Two plates made to act as one section are eight times as stiff. The difference is entirely in the joint, and the joint has a calculable spacing.

 The flange that is drawn, and the strip of it that is working. A plan of a flange 3 m each side of the web on a 20 m span, with the working strip shaded. The effective width is 2.531 m per side, 84.4% of what is drawn, so 101238 mm² of the 120000 mm² of flange is doing the work and 18762 mm² is not. Widening the flange does not move the shaded strip much, because its width is set by the span: the design code would allow 2.500 m per side here and no elastic flange of any width beats 3.183 m, which is L/2π. The lag exists because longitudinal stress can only enter the flange through shear along the junction with the web, so the free edges arrive late — 76.5% of the web's stress at the edge, in this case. Sections and stress

The flange that is not all there

Stress can only get into a wide flange through shear along its junction with the web, and shear takes distance to do it. So the width that is working is set by the span, and a flange 3 m wide on a 20 m span has 18762 mm² of steel that is there, and paid for, and hardly carrying anything.

 The shear part is not a curve at all. A 300 × 600 rectangle spanning 2,400 mm, a span-to-depth ratio of 4, with its bending deflection and its total drawn together. Bending gives 0.0254 mm and shear a further 0.0049 mm, so 16.3% of the movement is the term beam theory drops. The shear part is drawn separately beneath: two straight lines meeting under the load, each limb straight to 2e-16 of the peak. It is the shear diagram integrated once where the moment diagram above it is integrated twice, so it carries one degree of curvature less than the bending shape — none at all here. The real movement is 1 in 79,116 of the span; both panels are drawn at about 11,932 times it. Deflection

The deflection that is not bending

Engineer's beam theory computes a deflection as the second integral of a moment, and that calculation silently drops a term. The beam also shears, and the shear deflection is not a correction to the curve — it is a different shape, and for a deep member it is most of the answer.

 Two beams, or one beam four times as stiff. Two 200 × 150 planks spanning 4 m under 6 per millimetre. Loose, they have 112.5×10⁶ mm⁴ between them and deflect 16.2 mm, with the two faces at the interface sliding past one another. Bonded, the pair has 450.0×10⁶ — exactly 4 times as much, because doubling a depth cubes — and deflects 4.0 mm at half the extreme-fibre stress. Nothing was added but a restraint on slip. With connectors of stiffness 200 the same beam deflects 5.4 mm, which is 89% of the way from one bound to the other. Internal forces

Two beams, or one beam four times as stiff

Stack two planks and they bend as two beams whose faces slide past one another. Bond the faces and the pair has one neutral axis, four times the second moment and half the stress. Nothing was added but a restraint on slip.

 A check made on a perimeter, not on a section. One bay of a flat slab, 7.2 m square, on a 400 × 400 mm column. The heavy closed line is the control perimeter, 2d from the column face with its corners rounded at that radius — 4427 mm long against 1600 mm round the column itself. The shaded area inside it delivers no shear across it and is subtracted from the load; everything outside arrives through the perimeter. At 12 kN/m² that is 604 kN across 4427 × 225 mm, a shear stress of 0.606 N/mm² against a resistance of 0.658. Internal forces

A check made on a perimeter, not on a section

Every shear check in this collection is made on a plane cut through a member. A slab sitting on a column has no such plane, because the shear leaves in every direction at once — so the check is made on a closed line, and a line grows with the column while the load grows with the square of the bay.

 Strength at an angle, and the straight line that is not it. Compressive strength against the angle between the load and the grain. Hankinson's formula — f₀f₉₀ ÷ (f₀sin²α + f₉₀cos²α) — is an interpolation rather than a failure theory, and what makes it worth having is how far it sits from the straight line anyone would otherwise draw between 21 and 2.5 N/mm². At forty-five degrees it gives 4.5 N/mm² against the line's 11.8: 38 per cent of it, and 21 per cent of the strength along the grain. The curve drops away in the first twenty degrees because the weak direction starts governing as soon as it has any component at all, which is the same arithmetic as a section's weak axis and the reason a skewed bearing detail is a real loss rather than a small one. Materials

The material that has a direction

Every material in this collection so far has had one modulus and one strength. Timber has three of each, differing by more than an order of magnitude, and the consequence is not a correction to steel design — it is a different set of checks with a different one governing.

 A section has two areas and the tables give one of them. Peak shear stress divided by the mean, for four sections of exactly the same gross area and depth. The mean is V/A and is the number a first calculation uses; the peak is what the material actually sees, and the ratio between them is a property of shape alone. A rectangle's is 1.5 — the parabola's peak over its average — and it is one of the few numbers in this subject that is exactly derivable and universally ignored. An I-section's is near 1.98, and the reason is on the second bar: 97% of the shear is inside a web that is 56% of the area. So the flanges carry the moment and almost none of the shear, and the web carries the shear and almost none of the moment — which is why a shear check on an I-section uses the web area and a moment check uses the whole section, and why the two checks are about two different pieces of steel. Sections and stress

The section has two areas

A shear force divided by the area of the section is not the shear stress anywhere in it. A rectangle's peak is exactly one and a half times that number and an I-section's web carries nearly all of the shear over a fifth of the area, which is why a moment check and a shear check on the same member are checks on two different pieces of steel.

 The section that is checked is not the section that was chosen. A 457 mm beam coped 50 mm deep over 120 mm to frame into a girder. What is left is a tee with a section modulus of 3.836e+5 mm³ against the whole section's 1.438e+6 — 27 per cent. The moment at the end of the cope is the reaction on a lever arm of 130 mm: 23.4 kNm, giving 61 N/mm² and a flexural utilisation of 0.17. The web now has a free edge along the cope, so its buckling coefficient collapses from 4 to 0.425 — a factor of 9.4 — and the re-entrant corner has a stress concentration of 5.5 on a 10 mm radius. Connections

The section that is checked is not the one chosen

A beam framing into a girder has its top flange cut away so the two can sit at the same level. What is left is a tee with a quarter of the section modulus, a web with a free edge, and a re-entrant corner — and the beam was selected on a table entry that describes none of it.

 The shear centre of a channel. A channel of 100 by 250, with the shear flow in its flanges drawn. Those flows form a couple, so the load has to be applied 38.0 outside the web to leave the section untwisted — a point in the air, outside the material entirely. Sections and stress

The eccentricity a purlin cannot avoid

A channel's shear centre is outside the material, so a load applied anywhere on the section misses it. The distance is fixed by the proportions rather than by the detailing, it is 38 mm on an ordinary purlin, and the torque it produces is not an error anybody made.

 A short timber beam is a shear problem, and a steel one never is. Utilisation of the bending and shear checks on one beam, against span-to-depth. The two cross where the ratio equals f_m ÷ f_v exactly — no load, no width and no span survives the cancellation — which for this timber is 6.7 and for steel is 1.73. So a timber beam shallower than about six times its depth is governed by shear parallel to the grain, and a steel beam would have to be shorter than twice its own depth before the same thing happened, which is not a beam. The third check is bearing across the grain, which does not move with the span at all: on the beam drawn it is at 0.40, and it is the one that governs. Sections and stress

The shear that decides a timber beam

A steel beam is never governed by shear, because its bending strength is only 1.73 times its shear strength and no beam is that short. Timber's ratio is 6.7 along the grain and 23 across it, so shear governs at proportions people build every day.

 The shear deflection is not a correction. The share of a sandwich panel's deflection that is shear rather than bending, against how slender the panel is. A solid beam at a span-to-depth ratio of 20 spends about a per cent of its deflection on shear; this panel spends 25% at the same ratio, because its core is 2800 times softer in shear than its faces are in tension. At the 37 of the panel drawn it is 9%. The curve falls as the square of the span because bending grows as the fourth power and shear as the second, so the term that is negligible for a long panel is the whole answer for a short one. Deflection

The stiffness that belongs to the span

A section's flexural rigidity is a property of the section, and a member's is not. Once shear deformation is counted the effective stiffness contains the span, so the same panel is a different member at three metres and at six — and for a sandwich the correction is not a correction.

The library, page 5 of 7 — where shear-flow sits