Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Generator

What it costs to reach the plastic moment, for two shapes

Rendered here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it — which is the same list as the blast radius of changing it.
What it costs to reach the plastic moment, for two shapes. Moment against curvature for two cross-sections of identical area (3000 mm²) and identical depth (200 mm), in mild steel, each divided by its own first-yield moment and its own first-yield curvature. The rectangle has a shape factor of 1.50 and reaches 98% of its plastic moment at 4.3 times the curvature at first yield; The I-section has a shape factor of 1.09 and reaches 98% of its plastic moment at 1.2 times the curvature at first yield. The dashed lines are the rigid-plastic moments, computed from the equal-area axis rather than read off the curves, and no curve reaches its own.

What it costs to reach the plastic moment, for two shapes. Moment against curvature for two cross-sections of identical area (3000 mm²) and identical depth (200 mm), in mild steel, each divided by its own first-yield moment and its own first-yield curvature. The rectangle has a shape factor of 1.50 and reaches 98% of its plastic moment at 4.3 times the curvature at first yield; The I-section has a shape factor of 1.09 and reaches 98% of its plastic moment at 1.2 times the curvature at first yield. The dashed lines are the rigid-plastic moments, computed from the equal-area axis rather than read off the curves, and no curve reaches its own.

12 essays call moment-curvature. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

Three materials pulled until they stop. Three stress-strain curves — mild steel, high-strength steel, aluminium alloy — plotted to a strain of 2.0%. One of them has a plateau, so the stress at which yielding starts is something the specimen does rather than something anyone chooses. The 0.2% offset construction is drawn on the high-strength steel: a line of slope E from a strain of 0.002, cutting the curve at 460 N/mm². Materials

The stress at which nothing in particular happens

One material in six has a yield point that a specimen actually does something at. For all the others the yield stress is a construction — a line drawn at an arbitrary offset — and every strength calculation for those materials depends on it.

 Two materials pulled until they stop. Two stress-strain curves — mild steel, cast iron — plotted to a strain of 2.0%. One of them has a plateau, so the stress at which yielding starts is something the specimen does rather than something anyone chooses. No offset construction is drawn. Materials

The property that appears in none of the equations

Ductility is in no design formula on this site. Every method on this site depends on it — and a brittle structure does not merely fail early, it makes the analysis wrong.

 What it costs to reach the plastic moment, for two shapes. Moment against curvature for two cross-sections of identical area (3000 mm²) and identical depth (200 mm), in mild steel, each divided by its own first-yield moment and its own first-yield curvature. The rectangle has a shape factor of 1.50 and reaches 98% of its plastic moment at 4.1 times the curvature at first yield; The I-section has a shape factor of 1.09 and reaches 98% of its plastic moment at 1.1 times the curvature at first yield. The dashed lines are the rigid-plastic moments, computed from the equal-area axis rather than read off the curves, and no curve reaches its own. Materials

The section that yields from the outside in

A rectangle has half again as much moment in reserve past first yield as its elastic capacity suggests, and an I-section has a seventh. Read as a ranking that gets it backwards — the reserve is bought with curvature, and the rectangle pays four times as much of it.

 A I-section at 80% of its plastic moment. The same I-section drawn three ways: the shape, the strain across its depth, and the stress that strain produces in mild steel. The strain diagram is a straight line, because plane sections stay plane whatever the material is doing. The stress diagram is not: 0% of the area has yielded, working inward from both faces, and the neutral axis sits at 70.9 mm against a centroid at 100.0 mm. The compression resultant is 322.5 kN and the tension resultant 322.5 kN, on a lever arm of 180.1 mm, which multiplies back to the 58.1 kNm the section is carrying. A rolled residual stress pattern of ±30% of yield is locked in before any load arrives. Materials

The stress that was there before the load

A rolled steel section leaves the mill carrying eighty N/mm² of stress with nothing applied to it, in a pattern that sums to no force and no moment. It is invisible to every calculation and it is the knee in every column curve.

 Where the class limits come from. The width-to-thickness ratio at which two kinds of plate reaches its own elastic critical stress at the yield stress, for three steel grades. A flange outstand (buckling coefficient 0.43) derives to 18.6, 15.2, 13.3 at 235, 355, 460 N/mm², against quoted limits of 14.0, 11.4, 10.0; A web, in bending (buckling coefficient 4) derives to 56.8, 46.2, 40.6 at 235, 355, 460 N/mm², against quoted limits of 42.0, 34.2, 30.0. The derived number is the larger every time, and by the same factor at every grade — flange outstand 1.33, web, in bending 1.35 — because both the derivation and the quoted limit go as one over the root of the yield stress. A constant ratio is what a fixed knockdown looks like: the derivation is for a perfect plate and the quoted limit is for a rolled one, carrying residual stress and not quite flat. Materials

The section that cannot reach its own strength

A section classification looks like a table of arbitrary numbers. Set a plate's buckling stress equal to the yield stress and the numbers fall out of the plate buckling formula — larger than the quoted ones by a constant factor, at every grade.

 What a drop height is worth, as a factor on the answer for a weight placed slowly. The peak displacement as a multiple of the static deflection, against the height a weight is dropped from divided by the deflection that weight causes when it is placed. The curve is 1 + √(1 + 2h/δ), which is conservation of energy and nothing else: the weight does work over the height it falls PLUS the distance the structure then gives, and the structure stores work only over the second. At a ratio of 40 the factor is 10.00, and at zero it is exactly 2 — the marked point, where a dropped weight becomes a placed one. Dynamics

The weight that was dropped

A half-tonne load lowered onto a beam produces 5 kN. The same load dropped one metre onto the same beam produces 160 kN — and onto a beam ten times softer, 54 kN. The stiff structure is the one that suffers, which is the opposite of nearly every other rule about structures.

 The same load, two diagrams, both in equilibrium. One span of a pair of 7 m spans under 5 kN/m, drawn twice. The elastic solution puts 31 kNm over the support and 17 in the span. Reducing the support moment by 30% and taking what statics then gives leaves 21 and 21: the section the beam needs falls from 31 kNm to 21, a saving of 30%. Both curves are in equilibrium with the same load — the mid-span ordinate plus half the support moment is the free moment 31 kNm for either — and the second is legitimate for that reason alone. What it costs is 1.0 milliradians of rotation at the support, which the section has to be able to deliver. Internal forces

The moment that was moved on purpose

The elastic analysis of a continuous beam gives one set of moments. It is not the only set the beam is allowed to have, and taking a smaller one at the support is legal, cheaper, and paid for in a rotation that has to be delivered before the design exists.

 The same concrete, held sideways. Two stress-strain curves for one concrete. The lower is a cylinder test: it peaks at 30 N/mm² near a strain of 0.002 and has nothing left by 0.0035, because it fails by splitting apart sideways. The upper is the same material inside a 12 mm hoop at 100 mm centres, which cannot stop it expanding but can make the expansion stretch steel: the lateral pressure of 2.48 N/mm² — 8% of the strength it is multiplying — takes the peak to 44.4 and the ultimate strain to 0.028. The strength gain is 1.48 times and the strain gain 8.0; the area under the curve, which is the toughness, goes up by 11. It is the third number the confinement is provided for. Materials

Squeezed sideways into a different material

Concrete in a cylinder test fails by splitting apart sideways under a load pushing it down. Put a hoop round it and the splitting has to stretch steel — and a lateral pressure of a twelfth of the strength raises the strength by half and the ultimate strain by eight.

 What is left after the first fibre yields, which is a property of shape. The shape factor — plastic modulus over elastic — for six sections, computed by finding each one's equal-area axis and summing ±f_y over it. The numbers contain no dimension, no stress and no material: a rectangle is exactly 3/2 whatever its size, a diamond exactly 2, a circle 16/3π. The spread is the argument. An I-section keeps only 13 per cent in reserve past first yield, because nearly all its material is already at the extreme fibre and there is nothing further in to recruit; a diamond keeps 100 per cent, because most of its material is near the middle and doing very little elastically. So the section shapes that are best at elastic bending are the ones with the least left afterwards, which is exactly backwards from the way the reserve is usually described. Sections and stress

What is left after the first fibre yields

The elastic section modulus stops at the moment the outermost fibre reaches yield. Nothing else in the section has, so it goes on taking load — and how much more it takes turns out to be a property of the shape alone, with no dimension, no stress and no material anywhere in the answer.

 Wrong in shape, right in two integrals. The compression zone of a C30 section with its neutral axis 150 mm down, drawn twice. The curved outline is the real parabolic-rectangular stress distribution — the material's own law read off the linear strain profile plane sections supplies. The rectangle over it is what every design office uses instead: intensity η f_cd = 16.5 MPa over a depth λx = 125 mm. The two shapes are visibly different and give the same answer, because a bending calculation asks a stress distribution only two questions — how much compression there is, and where its resultant acts. Both are 619 kN at 62.4 mm from the face. The factors are α = 0.8095 and β = 0.4160, and λ = 2β follows from wanting the same centroid. A triangle and a full rectangle match neither integral and are nowhere near. Sections and stress

Deliberately the wrong shape

Concrete in compression follows a curve, and no design office has ever integrated it. Every code in the world replaces it with a rectangle of reduced depth and reduced intensity, and the answer is right to a fraction of a per cent — not because the shapes are similar, which they visibly are not, but because a bending calculation only ever asks a stress distribution two questions.

 Eight slices is enough, and nobody would have guessed it. The error in a cracked section's moment capacity against the number of strips it was integrated with, for a 300 × 450 mm section with 1200 mm² of steel, measured against the same computation at 2048 strips. The point of the fibre method is that it contains no formula: slice the section, give every strip the strain the assumed curvature puts it at, move the neutral axis until the axial force balances, and sum. It handles a cracked section, a confined one, a prestressed one and a composite one with the same twenty lines. The discretisation costs 1.4% at 2 strips and 0.088% at 8 — and the convergence is not smooth, because what the error actually depends on is where the neutral axis falls relative to a strip boundary rather than on the strip count as such. Sections and stress

The section calculation with no formula in it

Every ordinary section result is a closed form, and each was derived once for one arrangement of material. Slice the section instead, give each strip the strain a curvature puts it at, and move the neutral axis until the axial force balances — and the same twenty lines answer for a cracked section, a confined one, a prestressed one and a composite one, having been told nothing about any of them.

 Yielding one way makes it easier to yield the other. Mild steel taken to a strain of 1.20% and then pushed back the other way. The stress falls by 550 N/mm² before it yields again, against a yield stress of 275 — the elastic range is twice the yield stress and not once it, which is the Bauschinger effect and is a consequence of the yield surface sliding rather than growing. Materials

Yielding one way, and then the other

A material that has yielded in tension yields earlier in compression than it did the first time, and by an amount that is exactly what makes its elastic range twice its yield stress rather than once it. That is a property no monotonic test reports and every reversing structure depends on.

The library, page 3 of 7 — where moment-curvature sits