Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Generator

The length at which a beam stops being a beam

Rendered here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it — which is the same list as the blast radius of changing it.
The length at which a beam stops being a beam. Elastic critical moment against the distance between lateral restraints, with the section's plastic capacity drawn across it. The two cross at 3803 — beyond that length the beam buckles sideways before it reaches the strength its cross-section has, and the capacity is set by the restraints rather than by the steel.

The length at which a beam stops being a beam. Elastic critical moment against the distance between lateral restraints, with the section's plastic capacity drawn across it. The two cross at 3803 — beyond that length the beam buckles sideways before it reaches the strength its cross-section has, and the capacity is set by the restraints rather than by the steel.

7 essays call ltb-curve. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

The length at which a beam stops being a beam. Elastic critical moment against the distance between lateral restraints, with the section's plastic capacity drawn across it. The two cross at 3803 — beyond that length the beam buckles sideways before it reaches the strength its cross-section has, and the capacity is set by the restraints rather than by the steel. Stability

The beam that fails sideways

A deep narrow beam bending in its strong plane can, at a moment well below its capacity, swing out of that plane and twist. The failure has nothing to do with how much it can carry and everything to do with what is holding it.

 How stiff a brace has to be before the frame stops swaying. The effective length factor of a swaying portal against the stiffness of a horizontal spring at its head. The curve starts at k = 1.317, the unbraced value, and falls to 0.774 — the factor for the same frame with its head held — at a brace stiffness of 23.2 EI/L³. Past that point the frame buckles in the non-sway mode, which the brace does not restrain, and further stiffness buys nothing at all. The threshold is worth stating as 1.41 N꜀ᵣ/L, which is the form the number is memorable in: for a storey carrying a thousand kilonewtons over four metres it is about 0.35 kN per millimetre of sway. Against the frame's own lateral stiffness of 12.0 EI/L³ it is a factor of 1.93. Stability

The most dangerous day is before it is finished

A structure is analysed once, complete, with every restraint present. It spends weeks in states nobody drew — a beam landed with no deck on it holds 17% of the moment its section is worth, a frame not yet braced buckles at a third of the load it will, and a bolt not yet tightened is a pin where the analysis assumed a fixity.

 A brace on the wrong flange never gets there, however stiff it is. The critical moment of an 8 m beam against the stiffness of a single midspan brace, drawn three times for the three heights the brace could sit at. On the compression flange it climbs from 143 kNm to the two-half-wave plateau of 447 — the beam braced into two 4.0 m beams — and reaches 99% of it at 447 kN/m. At the shear centre it needs 2252 kN/m, 5.0 times as much. On the tension flange it never arrives at all: at the stiffness that would have done the job on the other flange it has bought a factor of 1.068, and a stiffer brace in the same place buys the same nothing. Past the plateau the beam stops using the brace, which is where the idea of an ideal stiffness comes from. Stability

The brace on the wrong flange

A brace on a column has one property that matters, and it is stiffness. A brace on a beam has two, and the second decides whether the first is worth anything: put the identical restraint on the tension flange and it does not reach the answer at any stiffness whatever.

 The length at which a beam stops being a beam. Elastic critical moment against the distance between lateral restraints, with the section's plastic capacity drawn across it. The two cross at 4086 — beyond that length the beam buckles sideways before it reaches the strength its cross-section has, and the capacity is set by the restraints rather than by the steel. Stability

The load that moves with the twist

A beam about to buckle sideways is beginning to rotate, and everything attached to it rotates with it. A load hung from the top flange swings out over the side and drives the rotation on; the same load hung underneath swings back and stops it. Two identical beams, two different capacities, and the only difference is a height.

 It is the square of the diagram that destabilises. Four moment diagrams normalised to the same peak, and the buckling factor each one earns. Eliminating the lateral displacement from the coupled buckling equations leaves one functional in the twist, and its destabilising side is ∫M(z)²φ²/EI_z — the SQUARE of the moment, weighted by where the beam wants to twist. A diagram with a peak over a short length has a much smaller weighted square than a flat one of the same maximum, so it buckles at a higher peak: uniform 1.00, uniformly distributed load 1.13, central point load 1.36, cantilever 1.71. The root-mean-square of each diagram, printed beside it, very nearly predicts the order — which is as close to an intuition for C₁ as the subject has. Stability

The shape of the diagram, and not its peak

A beam's lateral-torsional capacity is quoted against uniform moment, which is the one case a beam carrying a load never has. Change the shape of the moment diagram without changing its peak and the buckling moment moves by a factor of nearly three.

 Warping stiffens a short member and nothing at all a long one. The stiffening 1/[1 − tanh(κ)/κ] against kL, both axes logarithmic, over kL from 0.05 to 200. At the low end the curve is a straight line of slope −2, because for small kL the bracket is κ²/3 and the stiffening is 3/kL²: it reaches 1201 at kL = 0.05, falls to 1.005 at the top, and every open section ever rolled sits somewhere on it. The same three plates arranged three ways are marked: the 533 by 190 mm I-section at kL 2.76 and ×1.562, the tee at kL 37 and ×1.027, the angle at kL 34 and ×1.030. A tee's warping constant is 288 times smaller than the I-section's and an angle's 236 times, because their plates meet at a point and there is no pair of flanges to bend against each other — so they have no warping resistance to offer at all, and that is the reason an angle is a poor thing to twist. Stability

The restraint that beats the gradient

A moment-gradient factor is worth up to 2.7 on a beam's critical moment and is tabulated everywhere. Holding the ends against warping is worth more, is achieved by a detail rather than by a load case, and appears in no table at all.

 What a torsional brace buys, and the stiffness it takes. The critical moment of an 8 m beam against the stiffness of a single rotational restraint at midspan — a cross-frame or a stiffened connection to a secondary beam, resisting the twist rather than the sideways movement. It climbs from an unbraced 143 kNm to the same two-half-wave plateau of 447 a lateral brace reaches, and gets to 99% of it at 253 kNm/rad. Nothing in the calculation refers to a height, which is the difference that matters: a torsional brace cannot be put on the wrong flange because it is not attached to a flange in the sense the lateral one is. Stability

Twice the moment, four times the brace

A lateral brace has to be on the right flange and its demand is very nearly linear in the load. A torsional brace has no flange to be wrong about, and its demand is exactly quadratic — so the restraint that is indifferent to where it is attached is the one that gets expensive fastest.

The library, page 3 of 7 — where ltb-curve sits