Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Generator

The crack length at which the strength stops mattering

Rendered here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it — which is the same list as the blast radius of changing it.
The crack length at which the strength stops mattering. Failure stress against crack length for a toughness of 100 MPa√m, with one steel grade drawn. The falling curve is fracture — Kc divided by Y times the root of pi a — and it does not know what the yield stress is. The horizontal lines are the grades. At 355 N/mm² the two cross at a crack 20.1 mm long. Below that the section yields and the crack is irrelevant; above it the crack decides and the 355 is irrelevant.

The crack length at which the strength stops mattering. Failure stress against crack length for a toughness of 100 MPa√m, with one steel grade drawn. The falling curve is fracture — Kc divided by Y times the root of pi a — and it does not know what the yield stress is. The horizontal lines are the grades. At 355 N/mm² the two cross at a crack 20.1 mm long. Below that the section yields and the crack is irrelevant; above it the crack decides and the 355 is irrelevant.

16 essays call crack-strength. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

The crack length at which the strength stops mattering. Failure stress against crack length for a toughness of 100 MPa√m, with two steel grades drawn. The falling curve is fracture — Kc divided by Y times the root of pi a — and it does not know what the yield stress is. The horizontal lines are the grades. At 275 N/mm² the two cross at a crack 33.5 mm long; At 460 N/mm² the two cross at a crack 12.0 mm long. The stronger grade's transition is the shorter one — raising the yield stress does not raise the strength of a cracked member, it only shortens the crack that takes it away. Materials

The flaw that sets the strength

A member with a crack twenty millimetres long fails at its yield stress. Make the steel stronger and the crack that does it gets shorter, so the same flaw that was harmless in the weaker grade decides the stronger one.

 Three details, and no material anywhere on the plot. Stress range against cycles to failure for three detail categorys — 160, 90, 36 N/mm² at two million cycles. The lines are parallel because they share a slope of three, and the spread between them is a factor of 4.4 in stress and therefore 88 in life. Nothing on this plot depends on the strength of the steel: the same detail in a grade twice as strong lies on the same line. At a stress range of 70 N/mm² the lives are 160: 6.8e+7, 90: 4.3e+6, 36: 2.7e+5 cycles. The knee in each line is the constant-amplitude limit, past which the slope becomes five. Materials

The load that never came near failing anything

A detail survives sixty-eight million cycles at a stress range that another detail in the same steel survives two hundred and seventy thousand of. The two lie a factor of two hundred and fifty apart, and the material is not on the plot anywhere.

 The force spreads, and the spreading needs a tie. The end block behind an anchorage of 1200 kN on a 200 mm plate, in a section 700 mm deep. Half the force enters at the quarter point of the plate and leaves at the quarter point of the section, so a strut between the two rises 125 mm and needs a transverse tie to turn it. Placing the tie 0.5 depths from the face makes that tie force 214 kN — and at exactly half a depth this reproduces Guyon's 0.25P(1 − a/h) to the digit, which makes that famous coefficient a lever arm somebody chose rather than a property of concrete. The bearing stress under the plate is 20.0 N/mm² against 5.7 once the force has spread. Internal forces

The force that splits what it pushes on

A prestressing tendon delivers its whole force through a plate a fraction of the section deep. One depth further along the stress is uniform, and the spreading in between requires a transverse tension nobody applied — the force that splits end blocks, and the only number in the design that no equilibrium equation on the member can see.

 A strength that is a property of the specimen. Nominal strength against size for geometrically similar specimens of one material. On the left the specimen is too small for a crack to run and the strength is a plateau — a plastic limit, and the regime laboratory specimens sit in. On the right a crack releases more energy than it consumes as soon as it starts and the strength falls as the inverse square root of size, which is the regime real structures sit in. The turn happens at D₀ = 120 mm. A 100 mm specimen reads 3.10 N/mm² and a 1500 mm member of the same material carries 1.14: the test overestimates the structure by a factor of 2.71. Materials

The bigger one is the weaker one

Two geometrically similar beams of the same concrete should fail at the same nominal stress, because a strength is supposed to be a material property. They do not. The large one fails at less, and the reason is that a crack releases energy in proportion to a volume and consumes it in proportion to an area.

 How fast the strain arrived, which a quoted strength does not record. The dynamic increase factor on strength against strain rate, over eight decades. Steel follows Cowper and Symonds' fit, whose constant D = 40.4 s⁻¹ is not an arbitrary parameter — it is the rate at which the material is exactly twice as strong. Concrete in tension follows the model code's two-branch curve and is steeper. The four marked regimes are the argument: a testing machine works at about 10⁻⁴ per second, an earthquake at 5 × 10⁻³, a vehicle impact at a half, a blast at a hundred, and the enhancement across them runs 1.00, 1.08, 1.32, 2.04. So this is a correction that is either negligible or decisive with very little in between, which is why no seismic code carries it and every blast code does. What does not rise is the modulus, which is a lattice property, and the ultimate strength rises only a third as much — so the ultimate-to-yield ratio closes from 1.56 to 1.23 and the material has less warning left in it than it started with. Materials

The steel that is stronger in a millisecond

Every strength quoted anywhere in this collection was measured at about a ten-thousandth of a strain per second, because that is what a testing machine does, and nothing on a drawing says so. Load the same steel a million times faster and its yield stress rises by a third.

 Cover enters twice, and the strength of the concrete enters once. How long a 20 mm bar has before the cover over it splits, against the cover, split into the two halves it is always split into. Initiation is the time for the chloride front to reach the bar, which goes as the square of the cover — Fick's law and nothing else — and it is 9.1 years at 35 mm and 36.2 at 70. Propagation is the time from there to a split cover, which is short: 0.9 years, because the cover cracks at a section loss of 0.21% and no strength check in this collection would notice a loss that small. The pressure the cover can take grows with the cover too, so cover appears in both terms and the concrete's own tensile strength appears in one of them, linearly. That asymmetry is why every durability clause in every code is about cover and crack width, and hardly at all about strength. Materials

The load that comes from inside

Every action in this collection has been applied from outside — a weight, a pressure, a movement, a temperature. Corrosion is not applied at all, and the reason it belongs to statics rather than to durability is that what does the damage is a load: rust occupies three times the volume of the steel it came from, and the only place to make room is by pushing the cover apart.

 Four details, and no material anywhere on the plot. Stress range against cycles to failure for four detail categorys — 160, 112, 71, 36 N/mm² at two million cycles. The lines are parallel because they share a slope of three, and the spread between them is a factor of 4.4 in stress and therefore 88 in life. Nothing on this plot depends on the strength of the steel: the same detail in a grade twice as strong lies on the same line. At a stress range of 62 N/mm² the lives are 160: unlimited, 112: 2.1e+7, 71: 3.0e+6, 36: 3.9e+5 cycles. The knee in each line is the constant-amplitude limit, past which the slope becomes five. Connections

The detail decides and the steel does not

A fatigue check contains no material strength anywhere. The same detail in a steel twice as strong lies on exactly the same line, because a fatigue life is decided by the geometry of a weld and by the stress range it sees — and two per cent of the traffic does most of the damage, because life goes as the inverse cube of the range.

 The steel that is sized by the concrete. Ultimate moment of a 1000 × 400 mm section against the area of tension steel in it, with the moment that cracks the section drawn across. The cracking moment is 77.2 kNm and contains no steel at all — it is f_ctm times the gross section modulus, 2.90 N/mm² times bh²/6 — so it is a horizontal line, and every section to the left of where the two meet is one whose first crack is its failure. The crossing is at 507 mm², and rearranging the two expressions gives 0.245·(f_ctm/f_yk)·bd against the 0.26 the codes print — the constant is a section modulus divided by a lever arm and not a fitted number. The rule as printed asks for 538 mm² here, which is 6% more than the derivation needs, and that margin is the whole of the safety in a check whose failure mode is sudden. Sections and stress

The steel the concrete asks for

Every other bar in a concrete member is there because of an action. This one is there because of the member itself — enough steel that the cracked section can carry more than the moment that cracked it, so that the first crack is not also the failure. The requirement contains no load, and both of its consequences run the wrong way round.

 The strength that does not keep pace. Concrete's mean tensile strength against its characteristic compressive strength, with the ratio of the two on the same axis, scaled. The tensile strength goes as f_ck^⅔, so it rises from 1.57 to 5.04 N/mm² over a sixfold rise in the compressive strength, and the ratio between them falls from 11.1% at C20 to 6.0% at C80 — a factor of 1.83. Nothing in a bending or a column calculation ever uses the lower curve, and everything that decides a transition does: when the section cracks, how much minimum steel it needs, how far a bar has to be lapped, what a member without links carries. So a stronger concrete needs more minimum reinforcement, longer laps and a bigger crack-control check, in a member whose ultimate capacity has barely moved. Its real scale is a length: E·G_F/f_ct² is 299 mm here, which is the size at which a member stops behaving plastically and starts behaving like a fracture problem. Materials

The strength that is never used

Concrete's tensile strength appears in no bending calculation, no column calculation and no shear calculation with links in it. The whole design philosophy is that it cracks and the steel takes over. And it decides where nearly every transition in the subject sits — when a section cracks, how much minimum steel it needs, how far a bar has to be lapped, what a member without links can carry, and how wide a crack opens.

 The same steel, brittle in January. Fracture toughness against temperature for a 25 mm ferritic plate, from Wallin's master curve — 30 + 70·exp(0.019(T − T₀)) in MPa√m, whose shape is the same for every ferritic steel and whose only free parameter is the reference temperature T₀ = -60 °C. Beside it, and on its own scale, is the crack length that toughness will tolerate at 200 N/mm², which goes as the square of it. At +20 °C this plate carries a 764 mm flaw and at -20 °C it carries 199 mm — a factor of 3.8 for a forty-degree change in the weather, in a steel that met its specification on both days. Thickness moves the curve as well, and the wrong way: constraint at a crack tip suppresses the yielding that would have blunted it, so a 100 mm plate of this steel tolerates 27% of the flaw a 10 mm plate does. Loading it in a millisecond shifts the whole curve another forty degrees. Materials

The same steel, brittle in January

Every other material property in this collection is a number. Toughness is a curve, and the axis it runs along is temperature. Between twenty degrees and minus twenty a structural steel does not get gradually weaker — it changes the mechanism by which it fails, and the flaw it will tolerate falls by a factor of four.

 The crack length at which the strength stops mattering. Failure stress against crack length for a toughness of 100 MPa√m, with three steel grades drawn. The falling curve is fracture — Kc divided by Y times the root of pi a — and it does not know what the yield stress is. The horizontal lines are the grades. At 275 N/mm² the two cross at a crack 33.5 mm long; At 355 N/mm² the two cross at a crack 20.1 mm long; At 460 N/mm² the two cross at a crack 12.0 mm long. The stronger grade's transition is the shorter one — raising the yield stress does not raise the strength of a cracked member, it only shortens the crack that takes it away. At a working stress of 120 N/mm² the critical crack is 176.0 mm. Materials

Designed to be found in time

A fatigue design that promises a detail will not crack is making a claim about a hundred years of traffic. A damage-tolerant one assumes it will crack, and sets the inspection interval from how long a crack takes to grow from the smallest size anybody can find to the largest the section can survive.

 Two per cent of the traffic and most of the damage. A 120-year traffic spectrum on one detail of category 71, with each band's share of the cycles and its share of the damage. The two bars have almost nothing to do with one another, and the reason is the slope of three: life goes as the inverse cube of the stress range, so a cycle twice as large does eight times the damage and a cycle a third as large does a twenty-seventh of it. A full train is 2% of the crossings and 58% of the damage; and three of the five bands — an ordinary lorry, a van, a car, 90% of the crossings — sit under the cut-off and do none of it at all. The equivalent constant range that would do the same damage in the same number of cycles is 25.5 N/mm², which is the one number a designer is usually handed — and it is a cube-weighted average, so it is nearer the heaviest vehicle than to the average one. Materials

The cycles that do not count

A fatigue spectrum has to be reduced to one number, and the reduction is a cube-weighted average rather than an ordinary one. Two per cent of the traffic does most of the damage, ninety per cent of it does none at all, and the equivalent range that comes out is nearer the heaviest vehicle than the average one.

 Half the life is spent growing the first half-millimetre. The crack length against time for a detail starting with a 0.50 mm flaw under 800 cycles a day of the same five-band traffic the S-N calculation used, integrated by Paris's law. It reaches 1 mm after 91.2 years, 2 mm after 131.3, 10 mm after 172.9 and its critical length of 125.7 mm after 195.8. The curve is nearly flat and then nearly vertical, because the rate goes as the cube of ΔK and ΔK goes as the square root of the crack: the crack spends most of its life being too small to find and the rest being too large to ignore. The dashed lines are the crack lengths at which each band of traffic starts doing anything at all. Materials

The loops a crack grows on

A Miner sum reduces a hundred years of traffic to a number and throws away everything below the cut-off — on this bridge, a third of the vehicles doing exactly none of the damage. Integrate the same spectrum as a crack instead and that third grows thirty-seven per cent of the crack, because a cut-off is a statement about a constant-amplitude test and a crack's threshold is a length rather than a stress. The two calculations disagree about the life by a third and about which vehicles matter entirely.

 The same cycles, and two different lives. Two sequences made of exactly the same cycles — blocks of 6.00M at 40 N/mm² alternating with blocks of 0.22M at 90, on a detail starting with a 0.50 mm flaw. Taking the small cycles first, the crack reaches its critical 87.7 mm after 12.36M cycles; taking the large ones first, after 6.36M. Miner's sum at the moment of failure is 0.99 for the first and 0.68 for the second, so a rule that predicts failure at a sum of one is right to within a per cent about the first and 48 per cent unconservative about the second. The mechanism is on the axes: ΔK rises with the crack, so a large block met late finds a longer crack and does more with it. Materials

The record played backwards

Miner's rule adds damage, and a sum has no order. A crack does, twice over: a large block met late finds a longer crack and does more with it, and an overload leaves a plastic zone that slows everything after it. The same cycles rearranged fail at 12.4 million or at 6.4, and a Miner sum that is right to one per cent about the first is out by half about the second. One cycle in four million can add fifty-four per cent to a life.

 The magnification a crack sees is a ratio, not a depth. The stress magnification at a weld toe against the crack's depth as a fraction of the plate's thickness, on BS 7910's two-branch fit. It is a function of a/t alone, because a weld's own size scales with the plate it is on, so the elevated field is geometrically similar. The dots are the same absolute starting flaw of 0.20 mm in plates of 12, 16, 25, 40, 60, 80, 100 mm: the flaw does not move and its magnification runs from 1.81 to 3.50. A fixed flaw in a thicker plate is a smaller fraction of it, which puts it deeper inside the raised field rather than nearer the edge of it. Materials

The rule that points sideways

Every fatigue code puts the same detail in a thicker plate into a lower category, by a factor of (25/t) to the power 0.2, and explains nothing. It is a strange rule: a detail's strength made to depend on a dimension at right angles to the crack. Integrate a crack through a weld toe's own stress field and the rule falls out — same form, same sign, and an exponent of 0.13 against the design code's 0.2. Remove the toe's magnification and the effect reverses.

 The two knees the environment takes away. The design S-N curve for a category 71 detail and the two shapes a corrosive environment leaves. In air the slope is three to the constant-amplitude limit at 52.3 N/mm², five to the cut-off at 28.7, and nothing below it. With the cut-off removed the second branch continues. Under free corrosion there is one slope of three all the way down and no knee at all. The faint lines are the five bands of the traffic: three of them sit below the cut-off — an ordinary lorry, a van and a car, 90 per cent of the crossings — which is why they do nothing to a detail in air and something to every other curve on the figure. Materials

The cut-off belongs to the water

An S-N curve's cut-off is the most consequential thing on it: on a category 71 detail under ordinary bridge traffic it deletes ninety per cent of the crossings and leaves two bands doing all the damage. It is a property of steel in air. A crack tip that seawater or de-icing salt can reach has no threshold, no endurance limit and no knee, and the same bridge's life runs from 300 years to 45 depending on which of six defensible calculations is asked.

The library, page 1 of 7 — where crack-strength sits