Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Concept

Settlement — where it appears

The downward movement of a foundation under the load it carries. Its mean value is fixed by statics and is invariant to the superstructure's stiffness; only the differences between supports damage anything.

Named by 7 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Where the peak moment goes when a restraint is added. The same uniformly loaded beam with three sets of restraints, and the bending moment in each. Adding restraint moves moment from mid-span to the supports and lowers the peak — but only the first case can be solved by statics.

One support too many, and what it costs to know

Add a redundant restraint and the load has two routes to the ground. Equilibrium cannot say how it splits, and the answer turns out to depend on stiffness — which is a different kind of question.

deflection · Indeterminacy The ground pushes back hardest where the beam has gone down furthest. A strip 16.4 m long and 1 m wide on ground of subgrade modulus 50 × 10³ kN/m³, carrying 1000 kN at its centre. The beam settles 3.90 mm under the load and the ground pushes back in proportion — the arrows are k times the settlement above them, peaking at 195 kN per metre — so the pressure diagram is the settlement bowl and not an assumed distribution. The characteristic length 1/β is 2.56 m: the bowl crosses zero at 6.04 m, which is 3π/4 of it, and beyond that the arrows reverse because the beam has lifted off. By 8.05 m — one π/β — the disturbance is 4.3% of what it was, which is why the moment 641 kNm and the peak pressure 195 kN/m contain no length at all. The settlement is drawn 217 times full size — the real bowl is 3.90 mm deep over 16.4 m, about 1 in 4207 — and at true scale the beam would be a straight line.

The beam that sits on the ground

Every other beam in this collection is held at points. A footing is held everywhere, by something that pushes back in proportion to how far it is pushed — and that single change hands the structure a length it did not choose. Two or three of those lengths from the column, nothing knows the load happened.

internal-forces · Elastic foundation A bearing capacity is a mechanism, and here it is. Prandtl's collapse mechanism under a 3.0 m footing in a soil of 32° friction. A rigid wedge is driven down with the footing at 61° to the horizontal; a fan of radial shear turns the stress through exactly ninety degrees on a logarithmic spiral whose growth rate is tanφ; and a passive wedge at 29° has to be pushed up and out of the way. Nothing here is empirical — every angle is a function of φ alone — and the mechanism reaches 15.9 m from the centre, which is 10.6 times the footing's half width. That is why two footings closer together than about four widths do not have separate bearing capacities.

The ground is a mechanism

Bearing capacity is met as a formula with three terms and a table of coefficients, and that presentation hides what it is. Underneath is a plastic collapse mechanism — a rigid wedge, a fan of radial shear on a logarithmic spiral, and a passive wedge that has to be pushed up and out of the way — and every coefficient in the table is a property of that one drawing.

equilibrium · Bearing capacity Two of these move and the third cannot. The first span of a 3-span beam under 5 kN/m, with the stiffness of the middle span swept over a factor of 25. The support moment and the mid-span moment both move — that is what redundancy does, and it is the whole reason a continuous beam has to be analysed rather than read off. Their combination does not: the mid-span ordinate plus the average of the two end moments is 30.6 kNm at every point on this axis, which is wL²/8 for this span and this load and contains nothing else. The largest departure anywhere on the sweep is 2.3e-16 of the value, which is the arithmetic of the stiffness solution rather than a property of the beam. Continuity buys a distribution and not a capacity, and this is the line that says so.

Two of these move and the third cannot

Cut one span of a continuous beam free and add up the forces on it. What comes out is that the mid-span moment plus the average of the two end moments equals the free bending moment of that span, with nothing else in it — no stiffness, no support settlement, no analysis at all. Continuity moves moment about. It does not reduce the total, and it never has.

internal-forces · Static moment The group is not weaker; it is very much softer. A 3 × 3 pile cap on the left, with each pile's share of 9.0 MN and 4.5 MNm in meganewtons — N/n plus M·y/Σy², the same three terms in the same order as a bolt group under an eccentric load and a section under biaxial bending. The corner piles take 1.25 times the average and a pile added at the centroid would change that by nothing at all, because it adds to neither second moment. On the right is the effect a bolt group cannot have: the piles share ground, so the stress bulbs overlap and the group settles 3.9 times as much as a single pile at the same load per pile, rising to 14.2 for 144 of them. The capacity check everyone makes — block failure against the sum of the piles — comes out at 4.54 here and does not govern at all. The check nobody tabulates is the one that does.

Nine piles, and four times the settlement

A pile cap divides its load between its piles by the same three terms a bolt group uses and a section under biaxial bending uses. What a bolt group does not have is neighbours it shares ground with — and the group effect that matters is not the strength check everybody makes, but a stiffness effect nobody tabulates.

structures · Pile group The worst force in a pile is not at the top of it. A 0.6 m pile 24 m long through ground that is settling, carrying 800 kN at its head. Above the neutral plane the soil moves down past the shaft and the friction acts downward, so the axial force grows with depth; below it the friction acts upward in the ordinary way and the force falls again to the 300 kN the base takes. The maximum is 1282.87 kN at 13.78 m — 1.60 times the load applied, and it is at a depth where nothing is applied, nothing is connected and nothing can be inspected. A pile section chosen for the head load is under-sized by that factor over the middle third of its length.

The ground that hangs on instead of holding up

A pile is driven through fill that has not finished settling. The fill goes down past the shaft, the friction along that length turns round, and the pile is now carrying the soil rather than the other way about. The worst force is not at the head and not at the toe, and nothing at that depth can be seen.

internal-forces · Downdrag The worst force in a pile is not at the top of it. A 0.75 m pile 30 m long through ground that is settling, carrying 1200 kN at its head. Above the neutral plane the soil moves down past the shaft and the friction acts downward, so the axial force grows with depth; below it the friction acts upward in the ordinary way and the force falls again to the 600 kN the base takes. The maximum is 2331.39 kN at 18.86 m — 1.94 times the load applied, and it is at a depth where nothing is applied, nothing is connected and nothing can be inspected. A pile section chosen for the head load is under-sized by that factor over the middle third of its length.

The coating that takes the resistance with it

The cure for downdrag is to make the pile slippery, and it works — a bitumen slip layer takes the drag on this pile from 1,131 kN to 34. It also removes the shaft friction that was holding the pile up, in the same proportion and over the same length, and past a certain smoothness there is no neutral plane to find because there is no equilibrium.

internal-forces · Downdrag

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

CompatibilityLoad pathShaft frictionStiffnessBearing capacityDowndragEffective stressElastic foundationEquilibriumFree bodyIndeterminacyLower-bound theorem

All concepts