Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Theme

Which failure arrives first — page 13

Essays 289 to 296 of 296 on this thread, in the same order.
Four ways to put six bolts in one plate. Six bolts inside a 150 × 150 mm field of bolt centres, no two closer than 60 mm, loaded through a point (200, 0) mm from the field's centre. The two-column layout carries 193.5 kN complete and 138.8 kN with its worst bolt missing. The ring carries 167.2 kN complete and 117.8 kN with its worst bolt missing. The strongest found carries 234.3 kN complete and 149.7 kN with its worst bolt missing. The most robust found carries 231.6 kN complete and 174.7 kN with its worst bolt missing. The layout found by maximising the complete capacity and the layout found by maximising the worst omission are different layouts, 1 per cent apart when complete and 17 per cent apart with a bolt missing, and both beat the ring — the most evenly spread of the four — on both counts. The dashed line runs from each group's centroid to the load: 200 mm, 200 mm, 180 mm, 188 mm. The ringed bolt is the one each group can least afford to lose. Connections

The strongest layout leans on one bolt

Search a plate for the six bolt positions that carry most and the answer carries 234 kN — and loses 36 per cent of it if one particular bolt is missing. Move that one bolt fifty millimetres, into the corner the optimum had just left, and the group carries 232 kN and loses 25 per cent whichever bolt goes. Robustness here costs one per cent of strength, and a search for strength alone will never find it.

 Two flanges, one bolt, one prying force. An end plate 18 mm thick with its bolt 45 mm from the beam web, bolted to a column flange 14 mm thick with the same bolt 30 mm from the column web; their tips are 35 mm beyond the bolt and bear on each other, so the prying force there is one force acting on both. Checked as two separate tee stubs on rigid bases, the end plate carries 109.3 kN per bolt (mode 2, web hinge and bolt) and the column flange 104.4 (mode 1, both hinges), so the component method gives the joint 104.4. The pair carries 92.3 kN, 12 per cent less, with the prying force at 44.7 kN and hinges in the end plate at its web and the column flange at the bolt line — the end plate's web hinge working with the column flange's bolt-line hinge, a mechanism that exists in neither tee stub on its own. Connections

The hinge that forms in the other flange

An end plate bolted to a column flange is two tee stubs sharing one bolt, and the force at their tips is one force pressing on both. Checked separately, as the component method checks them, the end plate carries 109 kN a bolt and the column flange 104. Together they carry 92 — by a mechanism with one hinge in each flange that neither tee stub has on its own.

 Two blows on three foundations. The movement of a 150 tonne block struck by a hammer delivering 18 kN·s, twice, 0.75 s apart. On soil at 12.5 Hz with the 47 per cent of damping a half-space radiates, the block moves 0.86 mm and is still before the second blow. On the same soil over shallow rock, with 5 per cent, it moves 1.42 mm and rings for the whole interval. On springs at 4.0 Hz it moves 4.42 mm, and its ringing has not died when the second blow arrives. The peak force passed to the ground is 1.34, 1.32 and 0.42 MN: the heavily damped block and the lightly damped one pass almost the same force. Dynamics

The blow that has no frequency

A forge hammer does not shake its foundation; it strikes it. The transmissibility curve every isolation design is drawn on has nothing to say about a blow, and the rules it teaches mislead. The force a struck block passes to the ground is least at a quarter of critical damping, not the most; five per cent and forty-seven pass almost the same; and the springs that soften every blow can bring the block down to the hammer's own rate and make a train of blows ring four times as high as one.

 Thirty years later, two concretes against one. Stress down the composite section after thirty years — a 160 mm slab cast 6 weeks after a 700 mm pretensioned beam — computed twice: with the slab as a second, younger concrete that creeps and shrinks by its own laws, and with it given the beam's concrete and age. With two concretes the slab ends at −0.15 N/mm² at its top and −0.30 at its bottom, the beam at −4.03 at its top and −7.43 at its soffit. With one, the slab is at −0.29 and −1.06, the beam at −2.22 and −8.37. The slab's own shrinkage has taken its compression away and handed it to the top of the beam, and the soffit — the fibre the prestress was designed to keep in compression — has lost 0.94 N/mm² of it. Compression is negative. Materials

The slab that shrinks onto a finished beam

A precast beam with an in-situ slab cast on it is one member made of two concretes, and they do not age together. The slab's shrinkage is nearly the same whenever it is poured; what changes is how much shrinking the beam has left to share it with. Cast the slab at six weeks and it takes a ninth of the soffit's precompression away over thirty years. Cast it at a year and it takes a quarter, and goes into tension itself.

 The same restraint, spread and gathered. The buckled shape of a 24.0 m compression chord with the same smeared restraint, 0.35 N/mm per mm, delivered by U-frames at two spacings. With frames every 2.0 m the chord buckles in half-waves of about 5.1 m that ignore the frames — the smeared shape — at 1892 kN, matching the smeared answer. With frames every 4.0 m it buckles between them, with a node at every frame, at 1548 kN: 18 per cent below the smeared 1897 and at the Euler load of one bay. The dots are the frames. Stability

A row of frames is not a foundation

The top chord of a half-through girder is held sideways by U-frames, and the standard calculation smears them into a continuous elastic foundation. That is right while the frames are close and quietly wrong once they are not. The crossover sits at seven-tenths of the buckle's own half-wavelength, whatever the frames' stiffness — and beyond it the chord buckles between frames at a load no stiffening of the frames can raise.

 Four ways of being nearly a mechanism. Four measures of the two-bar frame against the angle its bars make with the line between the supports, on logarithmic axes: the bar force as a multiple of the load, the condition number of the equilibrium matrix, the largest relative change of force from a one-millimetre error in any joint's position, and the joint's sag under the load as a share of the rise, for bars of axial stiffness 200 MN over a span of 8.0 m, loaded with 50 kN. The first three grow as one over the angle: at 2° the force is 14.6 times the load, the condition number 54, and a millimetre of error changes the force by 0.7 per cent. The sag grows as the cube: 4.3 per cent of the rise at 8°, 41 per cent at 4°, 3.1 times it at 2°. The measure that ends the analysis is not the arithmetic's. Equilibrium

Rigid by every test, and still folding

Counting the unknowns says whether a frame can be solved and the rank of its equations says whether it can stand, and both answers are yes or no. A frame a few degrees from a critical form passes both and is still nearly a mechanism — and of the ways that shows, the last to arrive is the one the rank test measures. Its own sag under load eats a tenth of its geometry at six degrees; sixteen-figure arithmetic would not notice anything until well below half a degree.

 Four numbers read from a moment diagram. The moment diagram of the fixed-ended beam under a central point load, scaled to a largest value of one, with the four values the quarter-point formula reads: the peak, and the magnitudes at a quarter, a half and three quarters of the span — 1.00, 0.00, 1.00 and 0.00. The formula turns them into a gradient factor of 1.923. Solving the buckling problem for the whole diagram, on a beam 8 m between lateral restraints, fork-supported at its ends, gives 1.723: the formula is 12 per cent too high, on the unsafe side. Stability

The formula that reads four numbers

The factor that credits a beam for the shape of its moment diagram is usually taken from a formula that reads the diagram at four places — its peak and its quarter points — and nowhere else. On the straight-line diagrams it was built around it is safe. On a fixed-ended beam under a central load, whose moment is zero exactly where the formula looks, it is twelve per cent unsafe, and it would give the same answer for a diagram that deserves twenty-two per cent less.

 The toe that runs out of ground. A block 6.0 m square on ground that bears 300 kPa at most — 10800 kN over the whole base — pushed 8.0 m up, weighing 3000 kN, drawn at three stages of the push with the lean exaggerated eight times and the contact pressure under the base; the dashed line is the ground's bearing limit. At a push of 629 kN it touches the ground over 3.9 m of its 6.0 and has not yet brought the ground to its limit anywhere. At a push of 770 kN it touches the ground over 2.5 m of its 6.0 and has brought the ground to its limit under 0.8 m. At a push of 776 kN it touches the ground over 2.3 m of its 6.0 and has brought the ground to its limit under 1.1 m. The last is the tipping push: the heel has lifted, the toe is pressing the ground at its limit over a widening block, and the lever arm of the weight about that block is shrinking as the block grows. Equilibrium

The ballast that helps it over

On rigid ground a heavier block is harder to tip, in exact proportion to its weight — that is the whole of the overturning check. On ground with a bearing capacity it is not. The toe presses the ground to its limit, the weight's lever arm shrinks as the yielded block under the toe grows, and the tipping push peaks when the block weighs half of what the ground under it can bear. Past that, every tonne of ballast added to steady it brings it closer to going over.

All themes