Structural Engineering & Statics
where the load goes
Generator

Which limit arrives first

Rendered here at the parameters it defaults to, with every essay that calls it — which is the same list as the blast radius of changing it.
Which limit arrives first. Utilisation of the strength limit and of the deflection limit, against span. Strength grows as the square of the span and deflection as the fourth power, so the two cross — and past the crossing a beam is sized by how far it moves rather than by what it can carry.

Which limit arrives first. Utilisation of the strength limit and of the deflection limit, against span. Strength grows as the square of the span and deflection as the fourth power, so the two cross — and past the crossing a beam is sized by how far it moves rather than by what it can carry.

6 essays call which-governs. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

Which limit arrives first. Utilisation of the strength limit and of the deflection limit, against span. Strength grows as the square of the span and deflection as the fourth power, so the two cross — and past the crossing a beam is sized by how far it moves rather than by what it can carry. Deflection

Stiffness is not strength, and usually it is the one that governs

A beam can be nowhere near failure and still be unusable, because it has moved too far. For most long-span members that limit arrives first, and stronger steel does not help at all.

 Deflection goes as the fourth power of the span. Deflection against span for a constant load intensity and section, with two slower relationships drawn faintly behind it for comparison: the load itself, which grows in proportion to the span, and the bending moment, which grows as its square. Doubling the span multiplies the deflection by sixteen, while the moment only quadruples. Deflection

Span to the fourth, which is why spans are short

Doubling a span multiplies its deflection by sixteen. No other relationship in ordinary structural work is that steep, and it is the reason long spans are always a different kind of structure.

 Four materials pulled until they stop. Four stress-strain curves — mild steel, aluminium alloy, concrete, timber, along the grain — plotted to a strain of 0.6%. One of them has a plateau, so the stress at which yielding starts is something the specimen does rather than something anyone chooses. No offset construction is drawn. Materials

The one number a stronger steel does not change

Geometry beats material almost everywhere on this site. Stiffness is the exception in the other direction — it cannot be bought at all, because every steel ever made has the same elastic modulus.

 The hour that is really a temperature. The retention factors for carbon steel against temperature: the yield stress and the elastic modulus. The modulus falls away first — at 500°C the steel has kept 78% of its strength and 60% of its stiffness — so a member's failure mode can change during a fire. A member working at 60% of its cold capacity runs out of strength at 558°C, and out of the stiffness for the same ratio at 500°C, 58 degrees earlier. There is nothing about time in any of it: a fire rating is a temperature the member must not reach, converted into the minutes a particular fire takes to get it there. Materials

The hour that is really a temperature

A fire rating is quoted in minutes and there is no time in the physics anywhere. What decides is a temperature, and the stiffness reaches its limit sixty degrees before the strength does — so the way a member fails can change while it is burning.

 A derivative taken with a ruler, and the step that makes it worst. Castigliano's theorem says the deflection is ∂U/∂P, and the derivative here is taken numerically — two solves at ±dQ and a central difference. Against the unit-load answer of 1.720635e-2 it agrees to 1.6e-13, which for a linear structure it must: ∂N/∂P is exactly the force a unit load produces, so the two expressions are the same sum written twice. The error against step size is the classic pair of straight lines — truncation falling as the step shrinks, round-off rising as the difference of two nearly equal energies loses its digits — meeting near dQ = 1.2e+1. For a linear structure the truncation term is exactly zero, so what is drawn here is round-off alone. Deflection

The deflection that is a derivative

A structure's strain energy is one number. Differentiate it with respect to a load and out comes the displacement under that load — and the trick that makes it a method rather than an identity is that the load does not have to be there.

 The same load, two diagrams, both in equilibrium. One span of a pair of 7 m spans under 5 kN/m, drawn twice. The elastic solution puts 31 kNm over the support and 17 in the span. Reducing the support moment by 30% and taking what statics then gives leaves 21 and 21: the section the beam needs falls from 31 kNm to 21, a saving of 30%. Both curves are in equilibrium with the same load — the mid-span ordinate plus half the support moment is the free moment 31 kNm for either — and the second is legitimate for that reason alone. What it costs is 1.0 milliradians of rotation at the support, which the section has to be able to deliver. Internal forces

The moment that was moved on purpose

The elastic analysis of a continuous beam gives one set of moments. It is not the only set the beam is allowed to have, and taking a smaller one at the support is legal, cheaper, and paid for in a rotation that has to be delivered before the design exists.

The library, page 7 of 7 — where which-governs sits